MicrostockGroup
Microstock Photography Forum - General => General Stock Discussion => Topic started by: etudiante_rapide on May 25, 2016, 07:46
-
did anyone see this??? a woman was outraged that her photo that she posted (on social media fb i suppose) was outraged that someone took her photo and included it among many other women's photo which i assummed he took from fb without permission from these women
and put it in some "hot or not" article of his.
you should see the general consensus of the comments. one dude even said , "anything you put on internet is public domain".
huh??? no wonder our photos and videos from stock agencies are being used as "public domain".
i do not put the link here, but i found that article in msn news headline
-
It seems that the more ignorant a person is, the more dogmatic they are with their opinion
-
A lot of those sorts of comments are just straight up trolling.
-
It seems that the more ignorant a person is, the more dogmatic they are with their opinion
Generally those become politicians…
-
It seems that the more ignorant a person is, the more dogmatic they are with their opinion
Generally those become politicians…
lol, so true, ..or judges, as they control the ruling of the common people.
the politicians and judges pass the law .
you should see the comments. all of which were telling the woman who had her fb photo
included in some survey of "ugly or not" without her permission,
"serves you right".
it also refers to another similar case where the creator of fb did the same thing.
so i guess they feel that everything you put on internet, incl or esp fb
gives anyone the right to steal your photo from any social media
to be used.
iow, same applies for stock photos ,etc...