pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Poll

Should the Agencies introduce higher priced "collections"?

Yes, I think it would boost income and diversity
No, different Prices confuse customers and higher Prices drive them away

Author Topic: Poll: Should the Agencies introduce higher priced "collections"?  (Read 9402 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

« Reply #25 on: September 04, 2012, 21:09 »
0


RacePhoto

« Reply #26 on: September 05, 2012, 00:50 »
0
Should they introduce higher priced collections? Yes. Should they do it like iStock did? No.

Ah the perfect answer. Little heart for that one.  :)

« Reply #27 on: September 05, 2012, 08:24 »
0
I don't think it's a good idea. Shutterstock is moving along fine. This would be too much of a drastic change and could destroy something that works really well for a lot of people. It would put too much favoritism on some contributors over others.

I like the new licenses, but you can still get ANY photo at the base price, depending on your usage. It's easier for the buyers and it's easier for the contributors. Keep keeping it simple.

Besides, if you're a contributor and this is what you want, you have choices already. You can work with iStock or go with the RM agencies. Let's not make all the sites the same. That would mean fewer choices in the end.


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
"Istock Collections" what ??

Started by lisafx « 1 2 3 4 5 » iStockPhoto.com

108 Replies
27454 Views
Last post August 26, 2010, 18:24
by SNP
163 Replies
29476 Views
Last post April 08, 2013, 13:13
by alberto
16 Replies
6332 Views
Last post December 12, 2016, 13:32
by unnonimus
14 Replies
5182 Views
Last post September 08, 2019, 05:53
by georgep7
11 Replies
1965 Views
Last post January 10, 2021, 23:22
by cascoly

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors

3100 Posing Cards Bundle