pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: Shutterstat - TOP Images and Authors from Shutterstock  (Read 14768 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

« on: May 16, 2016, 07:28 »
+16
Hi, everyone. I'd like to present to you new service which can help you analyze modern trends from Shutterstock.

Shutterstat.pro [nofollow]
You can:
1) track image position in TOP in different categories
2) view TOP authors and rank them by quantity of images, % of sales etc.
Short description in INFO page

If you have some suggestion, text me without hesitations :)


« Reply #1 on: May 16, 2016, 08:04 »
0
Thats very cool!

Thanks for that!

alno

« Reply #2 on: May 16, 2016, 08:19 »
0
Hi, everyone. I'd like to present to you new service which can help you analyze modern trends from Shutterstock.

Shutterstat.pro
You can:
1) track image position in TOP in different categories
2) view TOP authors and rank them by quantity of images, % of sales etc.
Short description in INFO page

If you have some suggestion, text me without hesitations :)


Nice service!
I guess video section is still in progress?

« Reply #3 on: May 16, 2016, 08:43 »
0

Nice service!
I guess video section is still in progress?

Thanks! :)  Yes, I was asked to do the same for video recently so I'm in progress. I hope you'll have the opportunity to inspect this page ;)

« Reply #4 on: May 16, 2016, 09:27 »
0
Excellent work ! Does SS know about this ?

« Reply #5 on: May 16, 2016, 09:48 »
+2
Nice!
I found myself among those with photos in Top 100. I can tell that photos in Top 100 must sell at least once every day.
Great way to see where we stand!

« Reply #6 on: May 16, 2016, 11:07 »
0
Just as I expected, Rawpixel.com is making a killing with their business images.

Sadly, I don't have anything in the top 100.

Is there anyway to sort the rankings by earnings or download instead of portfolio size?

« Reply #7 on: May 16, 2016, 11:34 »
0
Just as I expected, Rawpixel.com is making a killing with their business images.

Sadly, I don't have anything in the top 100.

Is there anyway to sort the rankings by earnings or download instead of portfolio size?

I'm afraid this information ($ and dls) is not public, so there is no way for an independent third party to fetch it.

« Reply #8 on: May 16, 2016, 11:59 »
0
That's very interesting, thanks!

« Reply #9 on: May 16, 2016, 12:01 »
+1

Is there anyway to sort the rankings by earnings or download instead of portfolio size?

I think it's not available. This statistics represents opened information, which you can find by yourself but is would be much-much longer than use shutterstat:)

« Reply #10 on: May 16, 2016, 12:02 »
0


I'm afraid this information ($ and dls) is not public, so there is no way for an independent third party to fetch it.

That's right!

« Reply #11 on: May 16, 2016, 12:14 »
0
Any chance to get the video option working? There seems no link at the moment!

« Reply #12 on: May 16, 2016, 12:38 »
0
Just as I expected, Rawpixel.com is making a killing with their business images.

Sadly, I don't have anything in the top 100.

Is there anyway to sort the rankings by earnings or download instead of portfolio size?

I'm afraid this information ($ and dls) is not public, so there is no way for an independent third party to fetch it.

Thanks. I figured as much. That information is too private.

« Reply #13 on: May 16, 2016, 12:42 »
0
Any chance to get the video option working? There seems no link at the moment!
It's in progress! Maybe you have some suggestions? feel free :)

« Reply #14 on: May 16, 2016, 13:19 »
0
Any chance to get the video option working? There seems no link at the moment!
It's in progress! Maybe you have some suggestions? feel free :)

Maybe you can also offer a similar list based on the "Relevant" Top100, instead of "Popular" only

What I find striking is the absence of some very well known veterans, from these Popular Top100 lists.
Maybe they are still present on Top100 based on "Relevant", which is another way getting sales.
« Last Edit: May 16, 2016, 13:22 by Zero Talent »

« Reply #15 on: May 16, 2016, 13:33 »
0

What I find striking is the absence of some very well known veterans, from these Popular Top100 lists.
Maybe they are still present on Top100 based on "Relevant", which is another way getting sales.

I've been collecting all information since 24 of March 2016. All images which were in TOP on SS before aren't in the statistics. That's why you can't find them.

« Reply #16 on: May 16, 2016, 13:49 »
0

What I find striking is the absence of some very well known veterans, from these Popular Top100 lists.
Maybe they are still present on Top100 based on "Relevant", which is another way getting sales.

I've been collecting all information since 24 of March 2016. All images which were in TOP on SS before aren't in the statistics. That's why you can't find them.

Are you collecting top 100 from the "popular" tab, from the "relevant" tab, or from both?
If from both, how do you combine the two queries in one Top 100 list for each category?


« Reply #17 on: May 16, 2016, 14:16 »
0

Are you collecting top 100 from the "popular" tab, from the "relevant" tab, or from both?
If from both, how do you combine the two queries in one Top 100 list for each category?
Only from "Popular".
« Last Edit: May 16, 2016, 14:20 by Yakobchuk »

« Reply #18 on: May 16, 2016, 14:23 »
+1
Only from "Popular".

That's what I thought.
Hence the suggestion to collect the same info from the "relevant tab". If you query the "relevant" tab,
we will certainly see some veterans, even if they are not present among the most "popular" authors.

Money is not only made by being a "popular" author, but also by being a "relevant" author.

« Reply #19 on: May 16, 2016, 14:40 »
+1
Only from "Popular".

That's what I thought.
Hence the suggestion to collect the same info from the "relevant tab". If you query the "relevant" tab,
we will certainly see some veterans, even if they are not present among the most "popular" authors.

Money is not only made by being a "popular" author, but also by being a "relevant" author.

Thanks a lot! I'll think how to mix them, because now it seems to me a little bit difficult

« Reply #20 on: May 17, 2016, 08:25 »
0
Nice Job, works good and very useful

« Reply #21 on: May 17, 2016, 09:31 »
0
Thank You! Very useful site! :)

substancep

  • Medical, science, nature, and macro photography

« Reply #22 on: May 17, 2016, 10:00 »
0
Great job! Another great tool to (hopefully) find ways to increase sales!

« Reply #23 on: May 17, 2016, 15:25 »
0
good job!

chris-herzog

  • I love photography

« Reply #24 on: May 17, 2016, 16:31 »
0
Thanks, very well done!

« Reply #25 on: May 18, 2016, 04:30 »
0
Really nice :)

« Reply #26 on: May 19, 2016, 08:56 »
+1
Guess they forced him to remove it.


« Reply #27 on: May 19, 2016, 09:13 »
0
yep, looks like they didn't want it public

we can only guess why...

« Reply #28 on: May 19, 2016, 09:20 »
0
Guess they forced him to remove it.

:( it was fun while it lasted.

« Reply #29 on: May 19, 2016, 10:15 »
0
yep, looks like they didn't want it public

we can only guess why...

Except that all the information summarized on those lists is already public, available to everybody through the regular search feature.
I hope it is only a glitch or some update.


« Reply #30 on: May 19, 2016, 10:15 »
0
.

« Reply #31 on: May 19, 2016, 10:33 »
0
yep, looks like they didn't want it public

we can only guess why...

Except that all the information summarized on those lists is already public, available to everybody through the regular search feature.
I hope it is only a glitch or some update.

That's what I was wondering. Why would Shutterstock be able to tell someone they can't do that when the stats are coming from a public place? It's not like their site was hacked in order to gain confidential information. Must just be a glitch in the matrix.

« Reply #32 on: May 19, 2016, 10:53 »
0
yep, looks like they didn't want it public

we can only guess why...

Except that all the information summarized on those lists is already public, available to everybody through the regular search feature.
I hope it is only a glitch or some update.

That's what I was wondering. Why would Shutterstock be able to tell someone they can't do that when the stats are coming from a public place? It's not like their site was hacked in order to gain confidential information. Must just be a glitch in the matrix.

I can only think at "server overload" or some similar excuse.  Or maybe there is something in their ToS about external database querying?

« Reply #33 on: May 19, 2016, 13:43 »
0
yep, looks like they didn't want it public

we can only guess why...

Except that all the information summarized on those lists is already public, available to everybody through the regular search feature.
I hope it is only a glitch or some update.

Partly agree, "problem" may be that this script detect changes and positions from some time period.




 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
8 Replies
7558 Views
Last post November 16, 2010, 04:21
by fotorob
352 Replies
77150 Views
Last post March 18, 2013, 02:07
by leaf
41 Replies
23184 Views
Last post March 19, 2016, 09:03
by Ronib
0 Replies
5523 Views
Last post February 05, 2016, 16:42
by Aerofilms
17 Replies
6968 Views
Last post December 06, 2019, 08:41
by vectorblazer

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors