MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: Study shows that social media sites rip photo metadata!  (Read 3334 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

fotorob

  • Professional stock content producer
« on: March 12, 2013, 11:47 »
+3
Hello,

I just got a news release from the IPTC council who conducted a small study to test how Social Media sites handle metadata (IPTC/EXIF) in uploaded and downloaded photos.

You can see the results here:
http://pinterest.com/pin/261349584598198647/

or read their full news release here:http://www.iptc.org/site/Home/Media_Releases/IPTC_study_shows_some_social_media_networks_remove_rights_information_from_photos

It's a pity that almost no social media site meets all the requirements.

Looks to me like the winner is Google*, followed by Dropbox and 500px.

What do you think?
« Last Edit: March 12, 2013, 11:56 by fotorob »



fotorob

  • Professional stock content producer
« Reply #2 on: March 12, 2013, 11:57 »
0
sorry, link corrected, thanks for the hint, Luis

Leo Blanchette

« Reply #3 on: March 12, 2013, 14:30 »
+2
You'd be surprised what they are taking from you. Not just metadata.

« Reply #4 on: March 12, 2013, 15:04 »
+2
I never put up anything on the social media sites, if you read the terms of most sites they claim ownership of the photos.

« Reply #5 on: March 13, 2013, 04:39 »
+1
Thanks for the link and info, Rob. Not a big surprise, though. I'll keep my fingers off FB and others who think they can stand above law.

« Reply #6 on: March 13, 2013, 06:54 »
0
So we should support one of the biggest rip-off sites, Pinterest, by following your link to read about the report? Every time you click on a link and go somewhere else, you are making someone some money and giving out some data. I appreciate that you posted the links, but I am going to pass on that one.  :)

« Reply #7 on: March 13, 2013, 07:38 »
0
I do post images on Facebook, but always watermarked ones.  Also, customers who receive a dvd after a photo session, will find 2 versions on this dvd :  1 high resolution image for printing, and 1 web format watermarked version for facebook and other social media.  I am pleased to find out that most of my customers use the watermarked version when they post my photos (of their baby etc) on facebook.

« Reply #8 on: March 14, 2013, 12:51 »
0

lisafx

« Reply #9 on: March 14, 2013, 15:27 »
0
I do post images on Facebook, but always watermarked ones.  Also, customers who receive a dvd after a photo session, will find 2 versions on this dvd :  1 high resolution image for printing, and 1 web format watermarked version for facebook and other social media.  I am pleased to find out that most of my customers use the watermarked version when they post my photos (of their baby etc) on facebook.

Very clever idea.  I hadn't tried that, but maybe I will in the future.  Thanks for posting it Anyka :)

« Reply #10 on: March 14, 2013, 18:07 »
0
Here you can see the chart without going on pint'rest - "Photo Metadata Test Results Chart" (I came across it in today's fotoLIBRA pro blog post):

http://www.embeddedmetadata.org/social-media-test-results.php
« Last Edit: March 14, 2013, 18:29 by ann »


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
4 Replies
3398 Views
Last post February 14, 2011, 22:00
by RacePhoto
16 Replies
6317 Views
Last post September 08, 2011, 03:39
by Microbius
8 Replies
5224 Views
Last post May 06, 2012, 18:31
by Paulo M. F. Pires
1 Replies
2825 Views
Last post January 14, 2013, 12:43
by Jo Ann Snover
29 Replies
6053 Views
Last post May 10, 2022, 17:10
by Lizard

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors