Veer has some rather hard-to-fathom standards for inspection. I have a lot of travel shots - some cities, some tropical beaches - and I have had a lot of things that Veer says lack production value/are too editorial. I also have a lot they accepted. I honestly can't tell how they decided to separate the OK from the rejects.

All my outdoor images are carefully edited and "picture postcard" pretty.  As an example, if you search SS for Cayman Islands, 20 of the first 100 images (sorted by popularity) are mine. Veer rejected almost all of them as lacking production values. I know the images sell well but for whatever reason they don't want them.

I mostly try to ignore this sort of thing because I can't influence the agencies - they all think they know best

I am kind of glad that others have had similar experiences- sad but reality of the MS World...

I've had the same thing - the occasional batch gets rejected for production value, or large proportions of some batches, whereas others with similar subjects and quality sail through with few problems.  I think it's variability among inspectors, or possibly one who is moody.  I've never bothered to resubmit so don't know whether that is successful.

They're one of my lowest sites so I don't bother about them too much.  However, they have he highest RPDL of all the micro sites for me so I hope that sales will pick up - that's what keeps them in the list.

A lot of mine that have been accepted don't show when I search for them.  I need to disambiguate those that were transferred from Snap Village but some places aren't in their vocabulary.  I sell a lot of places like St. Ives on other sites but I get zero results when I search for it.  They must be losing a lot of money because of this, travel photos can be big sellers.

They mess with keywords all the time.  For example, I have a shot taken from a boat on the river at Wisconsin Dells of the actual dells themselves and they removed wisconsin and dells from the keywords.  They have removed the words figure and skater from a photo of a woman in figure skates and a sequined costume with her hair in a bun.  Seriously!  You can't go in and fix them either.

They mess with keywords all the time. 

one of the absolute worst is BS - any time you use 'woman' as a keyword, their 'suggestion' for keywords usually inserts 'sexy woman'  when there's nothing in the images, desc or keywords to suggest that