pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: very low sales - opinions of experienced photographers  (Read 25387 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

« Reply #25 on: January 21, 2009, 17:52 »
0
Hi,
I am asking more experienced contributors with portfolios over 1000 and more than 1 year on stocks - how are your sales recently and how you consider your future on stock ?
Personally I have portfolio over 1500 and have been in this business over 2,5 years.
Speaking about SS for instance - I have been always avaraging about 80 dls a day (even over 150 sometimes). Now it's about 30-40. Of course I am uploading new stuff, however there is no  such a 'boom' on them as it was even couples  months ago.
Having on mind that there are more and photographers, competition is extremely high, I am getting a little bit discouraged. May this business still be profitable?
you could retrain as a bricklayer or a ballet dancer.Driving a big red bus or taxi driving might earn you some income besides photography.Anyhow i hope you don't starve!

If I were not 19 years old and was not studying for the first year it may be quite a smart idea ;)


hali

« Reply #26 on: January 21, 2009, 18:14 »
0
  all the tips and tricks are soo easily traded on blogs, forums and other media that it is a shoot yourself in the foot way to go.

This is what I think is the biggest downfall in microstock, I know some people feel the urge to share their knowledge but generally speaking in the end it helps others to take away their income.

By the way Jay how's the blog coming along :D

But if you believe in karma, the good you give you get back ... 
so those who share will still be riding the crest of the wave, don't you think so  ???  ;)

« Reply #27 on: January 21, 2009, 18:27 »
0
I blame sagging sales on three things:

First: the economy
Second: sub sales. Once a buyer has 20-30,000 images saved. How many more would they need?
Third: Everyone with a camera in the world is entering stock. If everyone is selling them who is left to buy them? ;D

Oh ... one more thing. No images on any site should be sold for less than $10.00 per dl. If every micro site raised their prices to that amount .... they would still sell and photographers would make money.

Right now if you really want to make money in photography .... shoot weddings! I retired years ago from shooting weddings and in my best years made over $250,000.00 per year after paying my helpers. (Helpers: 5 freelance photographers.)

Nuff said.

-Larry

RT


« Reply #28 on: January 21, 2009, 18:47 »
0
  all the tips and tricks are soo easily traded on blogs, forums and other media that it is a shoot yourself in the foot way to go.

This is what I think is the biggest downfall in microstock, I know some people feel the urge to share their knowledge but generally speaking in the end it helps others to take away their income.

By the way Jay how's the blog coming along :D

But if you believe in karma, the good you give you get back ... 
so those who share will still be riding the crest of the wave, don't you think so  ???  ;)

Don't get me wrong I believe in helping the less fortunate, I just don't believe in helping them make me less fortunate.

As for riding the 'crest of the wave' the forums across most sites are littered with threads by people moaning about the decrease in their sales, are these the same people that have just shared their money making tips with others?

« Reply #29 on: January 21, 2009, 20:22 »
0
are these the same people that have just shared their money making tips with others?

What are you saying? ! ?

« Reply #30 on: January 21, 2009, 20:44 »
0
are these the same people that have just shared their money making tips with others?


What are you saying? ! ?


Seems obvious enough to me what he's saying. You could try www.dictionary.com for any words you're having a problem with.

« Reply #31 on: January 21, 2009, 21:11 »
0
Uh, that was sarcasm.  I think I know what he's pointing out.

« Reply #32 on: January 21, 2009, 23:40 »
0
Hi Niserin,
Sales on SS have been down a bit recently, everyone noticed that. People blame the economy, too many images, subscriptions... maybe it's just Shutterstock's marketing problems, who knows. Agencies rise and fall, I've been surprised recently with what I thought were hopeless sites starting having sales, and promising sites just closing their doors out of the blue.
I do think there is still enough market out there to support our living:)
Elena.

« Reply #33 on: January 22, 2009, 02:41 »
0
Having on mind that there are more and photographers, competition is extremely high, I am getting a little bit discouraged. May this business still be profitable?

Not really unless you'll become a volume shooter repeating the best selling concepts of others. You won't see those people a lot on forums, since they are just lurking. The Alexa traffic of this site, the MSG, for instance is very high, much higher than you can expect from the number of posts. The participants that share their knowledge (here, but also on site forums) and ports are the very social and friendly tip of the iceberg. The vast majority is just leeching. When they appear now and then (here), they won't show any port links nor use the same nick as on the sites.
The SS forum is a vast source of info too. "Show me your best seller", and yahoo, the friendly naive people put their bestsellers up there. Or they brag how much they get. It's very simple then to surf to their port, rank it by popularity, and see what can be reshot easily. Bragging makes you feel fine, but flying under the radar and leeching makes you rich.

Those volume shooters/copycats take notes, download comps, make a storyboard for their next shoot, and there goes your original successful concept down the drains. Three months later, you will see your original concept drowned in similars, especially on SS. I had it 2-3 times that a very good selling original concept disappeared after a while, and when looking for my keywords, I found 20 even 50 similars done later. In a few cases even with almost exactly the same keywords.

If they work hard and methodically, after 1-2 years, they have a port of over 5,000 with best selling concepts of others and an income that matches it. The individual photographer that just shoots for the love of photography and being creative and original once in a while could make it back in 2005 or 2006, but not any more. Especially SS is bad in that respect since your "populars" are heavily biased by the newest ones. Once a volume shooter tagged you, it's very easy to catch your recent best sellers and copy them early. That's much more difficult on DT since the most populars there are of all-time and take more time to find out.

I had a post ready yesterday at SS, in which I wanted to include a very promising concept that I didn't find on DT and on SS, so it was new. But I canceled my post in time, or I'm sure the lurkers would be there with the same stuff in a few weeks, since it's so easy to do. Unless you see it as a fulfilling hobby that delivers some candies now and then, to be successful as a stocker businesswise, you'll have to go for volume fast and copy till you drop.
« Last Edit: January 22, 2009, 02:44 by FlemishDreams »

« Reply #34 on: January 22, 2009, 03:41 »
0
If you help a newbie, you loose money. Simple as that. Dont tell anybody new (exept for buyers) about microstock anymore! LOL!

« Reply #35 on: January 22, 2009, 04:20 »
0
Where are prices going down?  On shutterstock we have seen prices go up every year, On dreamstime on the stats page, i can see my $/download average going up every month since they started.  Istock raised their prices a few as have most of the other sites.

There are a few exceptions however, which the addition of subscriptions on a couple sites, but overall I think prices have been increasing.

That said, yes I have noticed a somewhat reduced sales level this month.  It is hard to tell if it is recession, just seasonal ebb and flow, or competition.

« Reply #36 on: January 22, 2009, 05:52 »
0
The vast majority is just leeching.


I'm glad people are starting to finally see this.  This is why I don't do that many 3d renders anymore.  Too easy to copy.  For instance:
My image:


Jerk copier:

« Reply #37 on: January 22, 2009, 06:26 »
0
Quote
Don't get me wrong I believe in helping the less fortunate, I just don't believe in helping them make me less fortunate.

There is no shortage in the universe unless you think there is.  ;)

« Reply #38 on: January 22, 2009, 07:02 »
0
The vast majority is just leeching.


I'm glad people are starting to finally see this.  This is why I don't do that many 3d renders anymore.  Too easy to copy.  For instance:
My image:


Jerk copier:



HEy thats a nice image, I will try that !  ::)

« Reply #39 on: January 22, 2009, 10:30 »
0
The vast majority is just leeching.


I'm glad people are starting to finally see this.  This is why I don't do that many 3d renders anymore.  Too easy to copy.  For instance:
My image:


Jerk copier:



Wow. I'd report that as fraud. Seriously - something like that is just as bad as stealing an image.

« Reply #40 on: January 22, 2009, 10:45 »
0
I already had this one removed from istock.  Doubt I can do anything about ss.

« Reply #41 on: January 22, 2009, 11:43 »
0

Don't get me wrong I believe in helping the less fortunate, I just don't believe in helping them make me less fortunate.

As for riding the 'crest of the wave' the forums across most sites are littered with threads by people moaning about the decrease in their sales, are these the same people that have just shared their money making tips with others?

These forums are about  sharing information and therefore helping one and other. The degree to which this happens is open to debate but it surely happens. What goes around, comes around.


avava

« Reply #42 on: January 22, 2009, 12:29 »
0
Well said Zeus,

 I care about a lot of things but I am confident in my abilities to shoot around any copiers. I have shot a ton of stuff over the last ten years that a bunch of you have copied, if not intentionally then by coincidence.
  The fish jumping from one bowl to another was an RM copy from a friend of mine that goes back years but it was praised as creative on Micro for quite some time when it was stolen from Macro. Now who was that Micro shooter that stole the fish jumping first aren't they one of the biggest fish in the bowl at the moment.
 There is very little that hasn't been done. If someone copies you do it a different way, there is no way around it. It is part of the merry-go-round. Accept or try something that doesn't frustrate you as much, the key is happiness.

Best,
AVAVA

lisafx

« Reply #43 on: January 22, 2009, 13:20 »
0

As for riding the 'crest of the wave' the forums across most sites are littered with threads by people moaning about the decrease in their sales, are these the same people that have just shared their money making tips with others?

You may have hit on something here Richard.  Perhaps they are sharing false tips in an attempt to mislead the unsuspecting newbs astray...?  ;)

« Reply #44 on: January 22, 2009, 13:29 »
0

As for riding the 'crest of the wave' the forums across most sites are littered with threads by people moaning about the decrease in their sales, are these the same people that have just shared their money making tips with others?

You may have hit on something here Richard.  Perhaps they are sharing false tips in an attempt to mislead the unsuspecting newbs astray...?  ;)

Heh, false tips: "Wow, my pictures of dirty toilets are really taking off - almost as much as my nosepicking portraits!"
Thanks for the much-needed morning chuckle, lisafx.

RT


« Reply #45 on: January 22, 2009, 13:32 »
0
You may have hit on something here Richard.  Perhaps they are sharing false tips in an attempt to mislead the unsuspecting newbs astray...?  ;)

I think you're giving them more credit than they're due, some of the 'tip sharers' on SS aren't that clever.

lisafx

« Reply #46 on: January 22, 2009, 13:34 »
0

There is no shortage in the universe unless you think there is.  ;)

In all seriousness, I actually believe this.  You make your own luck/success.  

Very easy to get caught up in the idea of lack and bring it into your life. In fact I have heard it speculated recently by some economists that the one of the reasons the economy is so bad is because people who DO have money aren't spending it.

God knows I am doing my part!  Just got the 5D II and now getting our AC system completely replaced.  Gonna have to sell a LOT of photos to catch up ;)


Heh, false tips: "Wow, my pictures of dirty toilets are really taking off - almost as much as my nosepicking portraits!"
Thanks for the much-needed morning chuckle, lisafx.


Ewwwww!  Thanks for that mental image  :P  LOL!

« Reply #47 on: January 22, 2009, 14:53 »
0
I'm glad people are starting to finally see this.  This is why I don't do that many 3d renders anymore.  Too easy to copy.  For instance:
My image:


Your example is obvious and according to the PACA rules, it would certainly be called a derivatory work (the kids in the car) since it's the same concept colors, and almost the same angle. It's also not a "faut faire", like the girl with headset.
At SS certainly, it's becoming a method, a system and nobody wants to litigate for 33c x X.

The only defense is to do concepts that are not that easy to copy. Renders are. My best sellers for over a year on SS still is a set of waterfalls deep in the jungle you need a motorbike for, and it's also not easy to find beautiful Nordic models for the Yuri Arcurs copiers.

Ok here goes false tip #1: dirty toilets sell like hell!  ;D


« Last Edit: January 22, 2009, 15:00 by FlemishDreams »

« Reply #48 on: January 22, 2009, 15:10 »
0
The only defense is to do concepts that are not that easy to copy. Renders are. My best sellers for over a year on SS still is a set of waterfalls deep in the jungle you need a motorbike for, and it's also not easy to find beautiful Nordic models for the Yuri Arcurs copiers.
Using a 3D software with a waterfall&jungle library and some cute Poser girls... sometimes in 2012...  ;)


lisafx

« Reply #49 on: January 22, 2009, 15:41 »
0

Ok here goes false tip #1: dirty toilets sell like hell!  ;D





LOL!  Love that one! 

Although of course I didn't take it, here's the Worst Toilet in Scotland (from one of my favorite movies of all time):



 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
32 Replies
12919 Views
Last post September 22, 2009, 12:57
by goldenangel
9 Replies
6202 Views
Last post April 15, 2011, 07:52
by visceralimage
7 Replies
4686 Views
Last post December 09, 2012, 20:55
by Angel
19 Replies
5844 Views
Last post April 11, 2014, 08:18
by PryorMan
2 Replies
2240 Views
Last post September 14, 2018, 07:26
by bestravelvideo

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors