MicrostockGroup
Microstock Photography Forum - General => General Stock Discussion => Topic started by: stockmarketer on August 01, 2011, 08:55
-
Wow... rarely do you see such a high profile case of someone placing a watermarked image on the front page of a highly viewed website...
I hate Matt Drudge, but I must admit I check out his right-wing diatribe of a website to see how he's spinning the daily news.
This morning, he has a pretty clearly watermarked image he lifted from Dreamstime.com...
The site will change in a moment, but check it out right now... http://drudgereport.com/ (http://drudgereport.com/)
Here's the image he has lifted... http://www.dreamstime.com/royalty-free-stock-image-dollar-flow-in-black-hole-image6797566 (http://www.dreamstime.com/royalty-free-stock-image-dollar-flow-in-black-hole-image6797566)
Hey, mike_kiev, if you're on this forum, I'd be pretty miffed about this.
-
Don't see that pic on the front page now.
-
I warned in my original post that it would change in a moment (headlines are refreshed every hour or so) and it looks like that indeed happened. But if it happened once, it will happen again. Let's watch him.
-
If anyone sees it (another watermarked image) again, get a screen grab. That is something that the person whose image has been swiped could use in an e-mail of complaint.
-
If anyone sees it (another watermarked image) again, get a screen grab. That is something that the person whose image has been swiped could use in an e-mail of complaint.
------------------------------------
Or send it to a left wing blog for them to make fun of Drudge, which might be more satisfying :-)
-
This illustrates a major problem with the stock photo business model in this day and age.
BTW - I can barely even tell its watermarked on the DT site!!! I saw that on Drudge Report before reading this thread and never caught it.
-
hmm, I wonder if it was an oversight or a comp used accidentally. I've had an image in the Drudge Report, which they bought legitimately and they're high profile enough that I can't see this being a case of stealing an image. definitely follow up with the agency....