A few weeks ago I had some mail exchange with Fotolia support.
Basically, one of their reviewers mistakenly rejected some footage.
I was upset because they claimed they can't do nothing about it and they didn't seem to care much either.
I threatened to leave the agency if they wouldn't enable the clips right away.
Guess what? They enabled the clips and I've got two sales the same day after almost one month of no cash flowing on Fotolia.
This coincidence made me think and wonder.
So, here's the question: who is controlling the sales of the agencies?
I mean, I get a report which states I've got one or more sales. But who grants me that each and every agency reports and pays out the exact amount of clips they actually sell?
Seriously, I don't know.
Anyone?
Thanks!
A few weeks ago I had some mail exchange with Fotolia support.
Basically, one of their reviewers mistakenly rejected some footage.
I was upset because they claimed they can't do nothing about it and they didn't seem to care much either.
I threatened to leave the agency if they wouldn't enable the clips right away.
Guess what? They enabled the clips and I've got two sales the same day after almost one month of no cash flowing on Fotolia.
This coincidence made me think and wonder.
So, here's the question: who is controlling the sales of the agencies?
I mean, I get a report which states I've got one or more sales. But who grants me that each and every agency reports and pays out the exact amount of clips they actually sell?
Seriously, I don't know.
Anyone?
Thanks!
I am surprised that they didn't say FU and close your account. That is what and who FOTOLIA is, so you dodged a big bullet.
A few weeks ago I had some mail exchange with Fotolia support.
Basically, one of their reviewers mistakenly rejected some footage.
I was upset because they claimed they can't do nothing about it and they didn't seem to care much either.
I threatened to leave the agency if they wouldn't enable the clips right away.
Guess what? They enabled the clips and I've got two sales the same day after almost one month of no cash flowing on Fotolia.
This coincidence made me think and wonder.
So, here's the question: who is controlling the sales of the agencies?
I mean, I get a report which states I've got one or more sales. But who grants me that each and every agency reports and pays out the exact amount of clips they actually sell?
Seriously, I don't know.
Anyone?
Thanks!
I am surprised that they didn't say FU and close your account. That is what and who FOTOLIA is, so you dodged a big bullet.
Maybe Fotolia under Adobe is more contributor friendly.
I'll believe it when they let some of the banned contributors back on (the ones that haven't been hurling abuse at them of course)A few weeks ago I had some mail exchange with Fotolia support.
Basically, one of their reviewers mistakenly rejected some footage.
I was upset because they claimed they can't do nothing about it and they didn't seem to care much either.
I threatened to leave the agency if they wouldn't enable the clips right away.
Guess what? They enabled the clips and I've got two sales the same day after almost one month of no cash flowing on Fotolia.
This coincidence made me think and wonder.
So, here's the question: who is controlling the sales of the agencies?
I mean, I get a report which states I've got one or more sales. But who grants me that each and every agency reports and pays out the exact amount of clips they actually sell?
Seriously, I don't know.
Anyone?
Thanks!
I am surprised that they didn't say FU and close your account. That is what and who FOTOLIA is, so you dodged a big bullet.
Maybe Fotolia under Adobe is more contributor friendly.
Sometimes language is a limit. Not a native speaker.
Why are you so negative?
What's you problem Rose?
Actually SS pay us a minimum of 0,33 ...
Actually SS pay us a minimum of 0,33 ...
According to this page, the minimum is still 25c:
[url]http://submit.shutterstock.com/payouts[/url] ([url]http://submit.shutterstock.com/payouts[/url])
Actually SS pay us a minimum of 0,33 (most of us get 0,36) per image sell but they offer: (!!)
750 image downloads for 199$, so they get 0,26 per image
(this is the main packet)
We have three posiblities here:
1-They are losing money
2-Most of people who paid for 750 images, just download 500 or less
3-They lie us, they report and pay just a % of real sales
What is your opinion?
I'll take whiney over just plain nasty any day !!!!!!
A few weeks ago I had some mail exchange with Fotolia support.
Basically, one of their reviewers mistakenly rejected some footage.
I was upset because they claimed they can't do nothing about it and they didn't seem to care much either.
I threatened to leave the agency if they wouldn't enable the clips right away.
Guess what? They enabled the clips and I've got two sales the same day after almost one month of no cash flowing on Fotolia.
This coincidence made me think and wonder.
So, here's the question: who is controlling the sales of the agencies?
I mean, I get a report which states I've got one or more sales. But who grants me that each and every agency reports and pays out the exact amount of clips they actually sell?
Seriously, I don't know.
Anyone?
Thanks!
I'll take whiney over just plain nasty any day !!!!!!
+1
I'm assuming the name rose tinted glasses is meant ironically. Either that, or he/she doesn't understand the term.
Sometimes people should just accept rejections but your trolling comments are about as childish as it gets. Try not posting if all you can do is behave like a 12 year old. Sorry if I have offended a 12 year old :)I'll take whiney over just plain nasty any day !!!!!!
+1
I'm assuming the name rose tinted glasses is meant ironically. Either that, or he/she doesn't understand the term.
You assume correctly. You have to love the histrionics and temper tantrums that go on here for having work rejected. Little unicorns and rainbows for everyone. Some will call it nasty, but I call it a joke and * childish. What next? I won't be your best friend anymore?
Actually SS pay us a minimum of 0,33 (most of us get 0,36) per image sell but they offer: (!!)
750 image downloads for 199$, so they get 0,26 per image
(this is the main packet)
We have three posiblities here:
1-They are losing money
2-Most of people who paid for 750 images, just download 500 or less
3-They lie us, they report and pay just a % of real sales
What is your opinion?