MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: Inspection times for video  (Read 15027 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

« Reply #25 on: January 30, 2012, 22:03 »
0
Wow locked with lighting speed
thats was fast :)
Where he was been all this 9 months?
------------------------
Admin "visproquo" answered
We advise all contributors to file a support ticket when files have not been inspected for a very long time as they can in rare instances not appear in the inspection Queue. 9 months would qualify. I notice a support ticket filed today. Your missing files will be addressed by mid-week. I would ask you to keep the colourful language to a minimum in the forums, thanks.

http://www.istockphoto.com/forum_messages.php?threadid=340279&page=1

--------------------------------

I will post here how loooooong his mid-week will be (I am curious too  ;D )
I liked how he sad "colorful language" :)
« Last Edit: January 30, 2012, 22:12 by Suljo »


« Reply #26 on: January 30, 2012, 22:11 »
0
Your post didn't seem that "colorful" to me................

« Reply #27 on: January 30, 2012, 22:25 »
0
Your post didn't seem that "colorful" to me................

To me either. As a 99,99999% of males my dreams are black&white.
But if they ignorant practice will bee in this manner from upload to upload I really dont know what to think about them...

PS
I know but it was now for everyone ears...

« Reply #28 on: January 31, 2012, 19:36 »
0
Wow another lighting speed in rejection. Guess what.
ALL 7 footage files which are waiting 9 months are rejected. This always happens when you touching the sht with stick. Stinky smell spreads very fast to environment. I just feel anger of just waken IS video bear reviewer from its winter hibernation.
Cute fact is that I send HD, NTSC and PAL version of same file as same batch and somehow I screwed PAL files at 24.97 fps while NTSC and HD files are OK and they reject correct files.
---------------
"Dear Suljo,
We regret to inform you that we cannot accept your submission, entitled (IS Bear woke from winter hibernation) for addition to the iStockphoto library for the following reasons:

The PAL version plays at 24.97 fps, however proper PAL plays at 25 fps. This conversion error caused the processor to not fully process the file resulting in it not appearing in the Queue."
------------

I can just imagine how hard thing was to for just waken hibernated reviewer to just unmark or delete or erase this PAL version of file.
Where was mind too to upload PAL and NTSC versions grrrrrrrrrrrr who da hack buying this formats today??
---------------
Wow at the end of mail is cute sentence too.
"Once the above issue(s) with this video have been rectified, we will be happy to review it again for addition to our library.  Please be sure to address ALL of the above issues prior to resubmission."
---------------

Again?! when? in next decade, in which century or afterlife?!.

NO THNX

I will never play with sht and sticks... and I will never wake up bears from hibernation...

Anyhow if buyer hypotheticaly buy my PAL version @ 24,97 fps file. Will his computer monitor explode or something worse than that will happen to him?


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
2 Replies
7440 Views
Last post November 23, 2008, 18:22
by stokfoto
10 Replies
4821 Views
Last post January 25, 2010, 21:42
by xst
11 Replies
3741 Views
Last post November 10, 2011, 12:29
by helix7
3 Replies
2062 Views
Last post December 22, 2013, 06:53
by pixsol
2 Replies
3299 Views
Last post November 17, 2016, 12:05
by photog-teo

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors