MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: New to illustrations  (Read 20070 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

« on: March 03, 2009, 21:04 »
0
Hi all I am interested in learning illustrations and vector art.
Any advice on how to get started?




« Reply #1 on: March 04, 2009, 01:57 »
0
Download Inkscape a open source vector program and play with it until you learn it.  Look through vectors at all the sites to see what's popular, what's over done and what needs doing.  Create as many illustrations as you can.  See what sells and what doesn't.  Rinse and repeat.

« Reply #2 on: March 04, 2009, 03:34 »
0
Download Inkscape a open source vector program and play with it until you learn it.  Look through vectors at all the sites to see what's popular, what's over done and what needs doing.  Create as many illustrations as you can.  See what sells and what doesn't.  Rinse and repeat.

Do the big sites like Istock, Dreamstime, SS, etc accept illustrations from inkscape or are they wanting Illustrator CS only? I think I may have read something along these lines somewhere but not sure. So should I start with illustrator directly ?


« Reply #3 on: March 04, 2009, 04:10 »
0
What does most people use for illustrations for microstock inkscape or illustrator?

« Reply #4 on: March 04, 2009, 04:25 »
0
most people use illustrator.  It is far ahead of inkscape but both work.  inkscape is free so if you are tight on cash go with inkscape.  if you are wanting to be productive use illustrator.

My suggestion would be to perhaps try both.  You can download illustrator from adobe with a 30 day trial.  Download it, watch as many tutorials as you can on youtube and lynda.com and anywhere else you can find and see if it is for you.

vlad_the_imp

« Reply #5 on: March 04, 2009, 06:55 »
0
Quote
Hi all I am interested in learning illustrations and vector art.
Any advice on how to get started?

Spend 4 years at art school.
Unless you are exceptionally talented you will get nowhere otherwise (see all the 2nd rate vector artists clogging up all the sites and getting next to no sales)

« Reply #6 on: March 04, 2009, 07:24 »
0
Do the big sites like Istock, Dreamstime, SS, etc accept illustrations from inkscape or are they wanting Illustrator CS only? I think I may have read something along these lines somewhere but not sure. So should I start with illustrator directly ?

iStock accepts work in .eps format v8.  Doesn't matter where it came from.  However, if you have no skills or experience using the software, you are a long ways away from submitting to iStock, so don't worry about that part.

bittersweet

« Reply #7 on: March 04, 2009, 10:15 »
0
Do the big sites like Istock, Dreamstime, SS, etc accept illustrations from inkscape or are they wanting Illustrator CS only? I think I may have read something along these lines somewhere but not sure. So should I start with illustrator directly ?

iStock accepts work in .eps format v8.  Doesn't matter where it came from.  However, if you have no skills or experience using the software, you are a long ways away from submitting to iStock, so don't worry about that part.

This is correct. Actual drawing ability and a valid .eps file are all that's required.

« Reply #8 on: March 04, 2009, 12:37 »
0
Spend 4 years at art school. That's funny!  :)

« Reply #9 on: March 04, 2009, 12:50 »
0
Download Inkscape a open source vector program and play with it until you learn it.  Look through vectors at all the sites to see what's popular, what's over done and what needs doing.  Create as many illustrations as you can.  See what sells and what doesn't.  Rinse and repeat.

Do the big sites like Istock, Dreamstime, SS, etc accept illustrations from inkscape or are they wanting Illustrator CS only? I think I may have read something along these lines somewhere but not sure. So should I start with illustrator directly ?



The two major problems with inkscape are that you cannot use gradients or transparencies and the fact that many functions cannot be automated as in illustrator.  However the bezier tool is 1000 times easier to use in my opinion.  It's a simple program but capable to producing decent results.

bittersweet

« Reply #10 on: March 04, 2009, 13:07 »
0
Spend 4 years at art school. That's funny!  :)


While I don't think that is necessarily a requirement, I understand where the comment came from. It is a bit exasperating to see someone worrying about which software to use for their submission when they seem to have skipped a few of the fundamental steps to becoming an illustrator. Owning a copy of the program does not make one an illustrator. Basic drawing skills are kinda important (though I will admit seemingly not a requirement on some sites).

vlad_the_imp

« Reply #11 on: March 05, 2009, 09:09 »
0
Quote
Spend 4 years at art school. That's funny

Take a look in iStock's critique forum at the moment. 2 or 3 vector failure's unable to understand why their work has been rejected.
Here's a big clue-because it's crap. Maybe, if they'd had an art education they may have developed their critical faculties to the point where they could see that.
One of the big problems for stock agencies is the overload of rubbish uploaded. OK, the really bad gets rejected, but about 40% more could easily go, quality-wise.
Spending 4 years drawing non-stop improves your ability no end.

« Reply #12 on: March 05, 2009, 11:55 »
0
Spending 4 years drawing non-stop improves your ability no end.

And more important, keeps them away from uploading  ;D

bittersweet

« Reply #13 on: March 05, 2009, 14:16 »
0
Spending 4 years drawing non-stop improves your ability no end.

And more important, keeps them away from uploading  ;D

Yes, I'm sure that was the motivation for the comment.  ::)

I actually just happened upon a vector at SS that was honestly no more than a single Zapf dingbat filled with a rainbow gradient and repeated in various sizes.

I guess an important question is where you set your sites. If your only goal is to get something up somewhere, anywhere, then you probably don't need to put forth very much effort at all. Some of the sites are obviously very .... um... flexible in their quality standards. If your goal is to learn how to create quality work and be accepted into a quality vector collection, then you will need to get some drawing experience under your belt. You have to decide for yourself if it's worth the trouble.

graficallyminded

« Reply #14 on: March 06, 2009, 21:56 »
0
You can't use transparencies anyway, illustrator 8.0 turns blends into raster art.  That's no good, it will just get you big fat rejections.  If there's a way to use transparencies and the blending modes and save to eps 8.0 without issues, please someone fill me in. 

4 years in college didn't teach me crap about software - they just give you the basics in about a week.  I'm glad I started teaching myself back when in high school.  It's basically up to you to learn the software in the graphic design world.  No wonder why there are so many terrible designers; these schools crank them out so fast and they hit the job market not knowing what the heck they're doing.  I know - I've had to interview droves of them, only later to find out they couldn't do simple things like make a proper selection in Photoshop.  Thats the point when they got the boot and we had to throw the ad back up on craigslist, only to get 50 more applications every day.

helix7

« Reply #15 on: March 06, 2009, 22:55 »
0
... Owning a copy of the program does not make one an illustrator...

But... but... I bought this DSLR camera... doesn't that make me a professional photographer??  :(

 ;)

... No wonder why there are so many terrible designers; these schools crank them out so fast and they hit the job market not knowing what the heck they're doing...

Ain't that the truth. University programs today are crap. I graduated in 2002 during winter semester, with about a dozen other people. Today, I believe I'm one of 2 of those 13 people working professionally in the graphic design field. Most of those people were screwed before they graduated, they just didn't know it yet. If anyone thinks that just attending a college design program will get you a job, get ready for a big surprise. Colleges are grossly under-preparing students for design careers.



graficallyminded

« Reply #16 on: March 06, 2009, 23:57 »
0
Same here, I think I'm one of 5 that I know actually have jobs in the field.  There was probably a total of around 60 in my graduated class that were going for design as their major.  Some of them make it, but they're stuck in dead end jobs like newspaper or catalog layout.  Usually those types of jobs are $12-16/hr at best.  Or they're stuck working in sweat shop print centers or commercial presses.

« Reply #17 on: March 08, 2009, 16:12 »
0
How much does it take to make one of those 5000 dl backgrounds with swirling lines ??? Not 4 years.   No wonder people wanna try when they see those.

« Reply #18 on: March 08, 2009, 19:38 »
0
How much does it take to make one of those 5000 dl backgrounds with swirling lines ??? Not 4 years.   No wonder people wanna try when they see those.

Ha!
Much agreed.  Of the top fifteen most popular files on IS, seven are vectors, of which 5 are floral or "swirl" backgrounds.  One is a set of banners and the other is silhouettes with colored background.  I mean the artists no disrespect because these vectors are exquisitely done and very pleasing to the eye.  But like magnum said, who can't look at these rather simple illustrations and say to themselves "I could probably do that."  Obviously quite a few as the search terms "floral background" on IS produces 18,683 files.

However, vector programs have a very steep learning curve.  Those inclined to learn the programs most likely already have an affinity to or at least an interest in art to be willing to spend the time learning the program.  Since you NEED vector software to create vector illustrations, learning to operate the software is probably the most important thing.  As mentioned above there are graphic design graduates who can't even make a proper selection in Photoshop.  And there are probably a lot of art school grads who are crap artists.  Luckily the good and hardworking artists are rewarded by having higher sales by producing a higher quality and thus more desired product.     

« Reply #19 on: March 09, 2009, 03:21 »
0
I am interested in vectors and did a few with inkscape but mine are very simple and the more complicated ones must take a long time to produce.  I spend too long in front of the computer and the thought of adding more hours doesn't appeal to me.  I have a lot of respect for those that can do it.

« Reply #20 on: March 09, 2009, 16:14 »
0
I applied once to IS but my submissions were considered too simple.  And they are.  I am not AI master and I lost by small freehand drawing skills years ago in technical drawing.  Nevertheless, the humble illustrations I am able to make sell well - my best-seller in DT, BigStock and FT are illustrations (3 different ones) and I got a few ELs with them too. 

So even if it seems I am not to the level of being in IS, it doesn't matter.

Regards,
Adelaide


« Reply #21 on: March 09, 2009, 18:00 »
0
Thanks for your encouragement Madelaide. I also have drawn in the past at high school, and I guess never giving up is the key to trying.

« Reply #22 on: March 09, 2009, 18:04 »
0
i also think that my initial thread was misunderstood. I did not mean to get the latest software etc. I do firmly believe however in learning the system that would be accepted from the outset, after all what's the point of knowing how to draw if you can't use illustrator if thats the accepted standard of software?? or even becoming familiar with another software to start with if the output from it will not be accepted, might as well persist from the beginning with the correct thing even it it may seem daunting.

« Reply #23 on: March 09, 2009, 18:20 »
0
My DT best-seller was one of my first attempts and I used Canvas by then - a free version that came in a PC magazine.  When I tried to convert it to EPS as required by the sites, it was a disaster.  Later I purchased AI.

If you are ok with sticking to raster versions of your illustrations, I am sure AI is not required.  But if you want to sell vectors, then you will need AI.  Maybe another software is also acceptable, but surely not Canvas 6 - maybe a newer version is more compatible (it's from the same makers of ACDSee).

Regards,
Adelaide

« Reply #24 on: March 09, 2009, 18:58 »
0
Thanks again madelaide, your posting is more along the lines of info I was looking for.

« Reply #25 on: March 09, 2009, 20:18 »
0
The format that Istock requires for all Vectors to be supplied in is deliberately basic (Illustrator 8 eps compatible) to make sure that buyers can open and use the files so you should be able to use something other than Illustrator to create them with.

If you are serious though you need to learn Illustrator.

bittersweet

« Reply #26 on: March 10, 2009, 05:26 »
0
Here is a great article that touches on some of the issues with various software programs, as well as explains why the eps 8 compatibility is so important:

http://www.istockphoto.com/article_view.php?ID=156


« Reply #27 on: May 31, 2009, 01:26 »
0
Quote
Hi all I am interested in learning illustrations and vector art.
Any advice on how to get started?

Spend 4 years at art school.
Unless you are exceptionally talented you will get nowhere otherwise (see all the 2nd rate vector artists clogging up all the sites and getting next to no sales)


  ??? Nonsense, how do you know what stock clients may or may not want?

I have created work to imitate pre-schooler's drawings that have sold very well.

When my children where young they created some artwork and I posted them on Zazzle for them.  4 years latter they still sell on t-shirts and stamps.

Just because a style dose not meet your standards dose not make useless. Vlad  :-[

I've been producing artwork as a paid freelancer for 34 years and never been in an "art school".
« Last Edit: May 31, 2009, 01:45 by Dennis Holmes »

MisterElements

« Reply #28 on: June 13, 2009, 16:25 »
0
Quote
Hi all I am interested in learning illustrations and vector art.
Any advice on how to get started?

Spend 4 years at art school.
Unless you are exceptionally talented you will get nowhere otherwise (see all the 2nd rate vector artists clogging up all the sites and getting next to no sales)


  ??? Nonsense, how do you know what stock clients may or may not want?

I have created work to imitate pre-schooler's drawings that have sold very well.

When my children where young they created some artwork and I posted them on Zazzle for them.  4 years latter they still sell on t-shirts and stamps.

Just because a style dose not meet your standards dose not make useless. Vlad  :-[

I've been producing artwork as a paid freelancer for 34 years and never been in an "art school".


 I have to agree with Mr D! however I did have 4 years at SVA in NYC and I can say it did very little for my more simple styles. I made a tattoo dragon set that took 15mins to ink, scan and format and its made over $2000+ in 18 months with 100,000+ views on istock and xpert each and my top seller on SS. so sometimes the standard rules of quality and time don,t apply to sales. I have found a balance between time/quality to make a consistent money amount and a very good living. Plus flooding the market with too much work at once can turn your style into a fad not a living everything in business is about a good balance.  
« Last Edit: June 13, 2009, 17:00 by MisterElements »

« Reply #29 on: September 05, 2009, 16:14 »
0
Quote
Hi all I am interested in learning illustrations and vector art.
Any advice on how to get started?

Spend 4 years at art school.
Unless you are exceptionally talented you will get nowhere otherwise (see all the 2nd rate vector artists clogging up all the sites and getting next to no sales)

Late to this thread. But I don't understand where this response comes from. In the UK there are thousands of designers who went through Art School for four years and have never found employment (I happen to sit about fifty feet away from one and all he does is chase invoice payment) - so this does not entirely equate.  Also, some of the top designers in the UK have no formal "art" education yet somehow manage to make a serious wedge of money. If someone has ambition and focus, I say go for it.


Yes there is a lot of crap - yet crap sells surprisingly well....and art school graduates are buying it.

« Reply #30 on: September 05, 2009, 17:17 »
0
i also think that my initial thread was misunderstood. I did not mean to get the latest software etc. I do firmly believe however in learning the system that would be accepted from the outset, after all what's the point of knowing how to draw if you can't use illustrator if thats the accepted standard of software?? or even becoming familiar with another software to start with if the output from it will not be accepted, might as well persist from the beginning with the correct thing even it it may seem daunting.

I strongly disagree with this. Vector illustration is more a state of mind, particularly if you use the pen tool a lot. You have to think differently about how to create an image. Learn it in one program (even in Photoshop) and transferring to another vector program should be like driving a different make of car. Sure, it takes a while to become really productive (all the tools, hotkeys etc) but don't get too hung up on any particular software.

vlad_the_imp

« Reply #31 on: September 07, 2009, 00:36 »
0
Quote
I've been producing artwork as a paid freelancer for 34 years and never been in an "art school".

Yes, there are a few people who are untrained and manage to sell work, even enough to make a living. It's rare though.Going to art school not only improves your drawing skills but teaches you how to understand design and visual communication. Learning how to use Illustrator does not make you an illustrator. The proof is there to see on any 'latest vector uploads' section of any stock site. There is huge amounts of crap on istock and other sites, most of it produced by the untrained. The top sellers , illustration-wise, on istock, are all art school graduates. I would remove all the crap and the work from photographers who think they'll have a go at vectors because they pay better, the site would be a vast improvement.

« Reply #32 on: September 07, 2009, 03:05 »
0
Quote
I've been producing artwork as a paid freelancer for 34 years and never been in an "art school".

Yes, there are a few people who are untrained and manage to sell work, even enough to make a living. It's rare though.Going to art school not only improves your drawing skills but teaches you how to understand design and visual communication. Learning how to use Illustrator does not make you an illustrator. The proof is there to see on any 'latest vector uploads' section of any stock site. There is huge amounts of crap on istock and other sites, most of it produced by the untrained. The top sellers , illustration-wise, on istock, are all art school graduates. I would remove all the crap and the work from photographers who think they'll have a go at vectors because they pay better, the site would be a vast improvement.
I'm sure all the pro photographers would like to get rid of the amateurs in that field too.

« Reply #33 on: September 07, 2009, 06:09 »
0
Quote
I've been producing artwork as a paid freelancer for 34 years and never been in an "art school".

The top sellers , illustration-wise, on istock, are all art school graduates.

That's a false statement, trust me :D

I haven't gone to a traditional art school but I am doing quite well on daily earnings. Of course not too high yet on all time earnings and downloads, as I started a year and a half ago. Btw, my career outside stock was going very well too.

All this aside, I believe in education a lot! I have to add that I got a training in graphic design and animation, but definitely never studied traditional arts and illustration.

I will kind of agree with you as I am pretty good at self learning. I read many books on art and illustration. Yes I haven't been to a traditional art school but what they teach at an art school is accessible outside the art school as well If you want to find it.

It depends on the person. That's why you can not generalize. I am sure I know more on illustration then many art school graduates as I did read lots of text they teach there. Some people just can't get it even if they are going to an art school. And some people will find the books and resources no matter if they go to an art school or not.

« Reply #34 on: September 07, 2009, 06:24 »
0
after all what's the point of knowing how to draw if you can't use illustrator if thats the accepted standard of software??

Good luck with that!

Everybody has a chance if they accept the challenge and work hard to overcome the obstacles it represents. But there is definitely no chance if you don't believe you will need to improve your drawing skills as well as learning the software.

After this statement, I think your chance on becoming a good vector artist is less than the possibility of you winning the lottery.

« Reply #35 on: September 07, 2009, 07:26 »
0
after all what's the point of knowing how to draw if you can't use illustrator if thats the accepted standard of software??

Good luck with that!

Everybody has a chance if they accept the challenge and work hard to overcome the obstacles it represents. But there is definitely no chance if you don't believe you will need to improve your drawing skills as well as learning the software.

After this statement, I think your chance on becoming a good vector artist is less than the possibility of you winning the lottery.
I think you're being a bit harsh here. Many traditional artists have a hard time learning to create art with digital media. Artists tend to be a bit inimical towards technology. I've been looking at a lot of books on drawing myself lately and they nearly all use traditional media. The very few that mention computers mention Photoshop. I've yet to see a book on drawing that teaches how to draw with a vector program. The many books on how to use Illustrator don't teach drawing skills, only how to use the tools.

« Reply #36 on: September 07, 2009, 07:35 »
0
The many books on how to use Illustrator don't teach drawing skills, only how to use the tools.

They will never teach drawing skills. Drawing skills MUST be learned traditionally. Once you learn them then you will need some time to get used to illustrator tools.

You can watch videos on how to use illustrator on adobe.com, on youtube, on lynda.com or on vtc.com

They will all teach you how to use the software. You can be sure that they will never teach you drawing skills. Because illustrator is not a magical tool that will turn dummies into picasso. Illustrator is only there to help you utilize already existing drawing skills. Don't expect any tutorials on that.

I was definitely not harsh. If he/she would like to draw vectors, then he/she will have to improve traditional drawing skills. Better tell people the truth than make them happy with a false statement.
« Last Edit: September 07, 2009, 07:38 by cidepix »

vlad_the_imp

« Reply #37 on: September 07, 2009, 08:19 »
0
Quote
That's a false statement, trust me

Well I know most of the top 20 vector artists (are you in that group, I think possibly not) and the vast majority are artschool trained.

« Reply #38 on: September 07, 2009, 08:34 »
0
Quote
That's a false statement, trust me

Well I know most of the top 20 vector artists (are you in that group, I think possibly not) and the vast majority are artschool trained.

Well I am not. Entering microstock 4-5 years late doesn't help either.

But outside microstock I don't think that top 20 is much ahead of me. Anyway, my point is education is very important. Limiting it to art school is ridiculous. Some people can be very well educated without an art school. As I said I studied animation and Graphic design AT SCHOOL, and illustration from books and all sorts of resources.

So I still studied art and illustration but not at school. You saying "4 year spent at art school" being a must, is really not working for everyone.

Not only the books but I had the chance to be trained in person by a very famous cartoonist and learn many technical aspects of illustration from him.

It is really ridiculous to think that you can't be successful without art school. There are many ways people can learn art.

vlad_the_imp

« Reply #39 on: September 07, 2009, 09:55 »
0
Quote
You saying "4 year spent at art school" being a must,

Nowhere have I said it's a must. However, having been in the business quite possibly more years than you've been alive, I've met a lot of people and the majority, the vast majority, are art school graduates. It is possible to teach yourself but it's not just about learning how to use illustrator, it's also about looking and seeing and absorbing the collective knowledge of your tutors and lecturers and fellow students. It's about opening up to a whole wide world of artistic influences, not just illustration but fine art and studying whole areas connected to and influencing and influenced by art. I never said you can't be successful without art school, it's just a lot harder.

« Reply #40 on: September 07, 2009, 11:25 »
0
Quote
You saying "4 year spent at art school" being a must,

Nowhere have I said it's a must. However, having been in the business quite possibly more years than you've been alive, I've met a lot of people and the majority, the vast majority, are art school graduates. It is possible to teach yourself but it's not just about learning how to use illustrator, it's also about looking and seeing and absorbing the collective knowledge of your tutors and lecturers and fellow students. It's about opening up to a whole wide world of artistic influences, not just illustration but fine art and studying whole areas connected to and influencing and influenced by art. I never said you can't be successful without art school, it's just a lot harder.

I agree that you have to work much harder if you have not gone to art school. You said all top sellers are art school graduates. I don't agree with that. If you are limiting the top sellers to 20 people only than you may be right, but I think even top 100 consists of good sellers and not all of them are art graduates.

As I said there are many ways to study. Especially nowadays. It is astonishing the material you can find on the internet. All the knowledge of tutors you are talking about are there. Just google it!


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
1 Replies
4276 Views
Last post July 09, 2009, 02:09
by Team PantherMedia
11 Replies
6015 Views
Last post May 26, 2010, 17:27
by VB inc
2 Replies
4165 Views
Last post December 12, 2010, 01:17
by mtkang
1 Replies
2520 Views
Last post December 12, 2010, 13:26
by Kone
19 Replies
9278 Views
Last post February 02, 2011, 14:30
by Diomedes66

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors