MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: New stock photography site - Stockxpose  (Read 20216 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

« on: February 06, 2010, 03:53 »
0
We have created a new micro stock photography site check this out

Link Removed is a stock photo sharing website where designers and photographers can meet to share their stock images. Buy and sell royalty-free stock photos on stockxpose.com. Affordable royalty-free stock photos, cheap stock images.

we need your valuable  opinion & suggestions.

Admin Edit: Link removed - please read the whole thread before you consider signing up to this site.
« Last Edit: February 09, 2010, 03:27 by leaf »


« Reply #1 on: February 06, 2010, 04:19 »
0
lose the entrecard banner .. those things are seen as lame even in the hobby blogger circuit. It's not a way of trying to be taken serious. That was actually the very first thing that jumped out at me the second the page opened.


« Reply #2 on: February 06, 2010, 04:28 »
0
well I guess all I can say is good luck.  You are up against some stiff competition.  The latest drive for photographers, done by DepositPhotos is offering $0.20 / uploaded file and a good referral program.

« Reply #3 on: February 06, 2010, 04:43 »
0
Here are some initial thoughts on the site.

Ups:

- 50% commission
- Vectors seem to be reasonably priced
- Nice looking site. I really like it!

Downs:

- When uploading vectors, the preview must be no bigger than 270x270. My previews are always 9mp+, and certainly not going through the hassle just for uploading at StockXpose.
- No keyword limit
- Ugly banner ad in the left side of the screen
- No FAQ ? Seriously, I need to know exactly how my images are priced, I need to know whether I'm going to receive 50% of the credits spent or the USD spent, all those sorts of things need to be perfectly clear to begin with.
- Couldn't find any information about where you are based, names etc. - not even an e-mail address! That always looks suspicious to me, I can't help it.
« Last Edit: February 06, 2010, 04:46 by ThomasAmby »

« Reply #4 on: February 06, 2010, 04:50 »
0
- Couldn't find any information about where you are based, names etc. - not even an e-mail address! That always looks suspicious to me, I can't help it.

Contact Us takes you to just a form you can fill in.

That can mean one of two things - you have something to hide or you have not put enough thoughts into content of your site.

Bad, bad...

And whois:

Domain ID:
Domain Name: stockxpose.com
Created On: 17-Nov-2009 00:00:00
Expiration Date: 17-Nov-2010 00:00:00
Sponsoring Registrar: 'Check Whois' (PUBLICDOMAINREGISTRY) (PUBLICDOMAINREGISTRY)
Status: ok
Name Server: ns1.panelboxmanager.com
Name Server: ns2.panelboxmanager.com
Registrant ID: Unknown
Registrant Name: Naveen Kumar       
Registrant Organization: Unknown
Registrant Street1: 25/17, Neathaji Nagar
Registrant Street2: Unknown
Registrant Street3: Unknown
Registrant City: Villivakkam
Registrant State/Province: Chennai
Registrant Postal Code: Unknown
Registrant Country: tamilnadu,600049
Registrant Phone: Unknown
Registrant Fax: Unknown
Registrant Email: Unknown
Admin ID: Unknown
Admin Name: Unknown Naveen Kumar       
Admin Organization: Unknown
Admin Street1: IN
Admin Street2: Unknown
Admin Street3: Unknown
Admin City: 25/17, Neathaji Nagar
Admin State: Villivakkam
Admin Postal Code: Unknown
Admin Country: Chennai
Admin Phone: +91.9841343717
Admin Fax: Unknown
Admin Email: [email protected]
« Last Edit: February 06, 2010, 04:52 by Danicek »

« Reply #5 on: February 06, 2010, 05:44 »
0
I only had a quick look around, so maybe there is mistakes in what I've written / seen :)

To me the site is clean (except the ad which is just an ugly black box because of the blocker) but looks to me like a template, doesnt seem a lot happening (but I know that its all new <200 photos)

$3 for 30mb image ?? seems too cheap

no contact details, beyond web form ?? who are you, where are you etc.

lots of categories, does the artist selects them as part of upload? (personally the time and wages spent on choosing categories vs expected return means that I wont add any more sites with categories)

I didnt see where artists actually grant you the right to licence the content etc but saw 'As a member of the site You may authorize Stockxpose to offer your own Images for download. The terms that govern Image uploads can be found in the Artist agreement.' - where is it I cant find it (I didnt actually sign up, maybe it is there?).

to my my quick laymans eye TOS is light on with what appears issues, especially comparing quickly to SS etc. I think you want to get a lawyer to write one so that you protect yourself and contributors and specify by which countries laws agreements are bound to etc.

numerous issues but a few things in particular jumped out at me;

Photographers tutorial is not actually an agreement (so hope this isn't artists agreement), but
1.) You must be the photographer of the photo or the artist who created the artwork.
No exceptions. - this means anyone with staff togs / artists etc is out.  Questionable about anyone operating through a company??

You has a capital at each point as if there is going to be a specific definition but there isnt one

This agreement may be revised or updated without notice. You are advised to review it regularly.  - alarm bells ringing here, how often? I'm not checking the TOS weekly in case its changed (imo you should email or notify changes on login like SS / IS).

you may want to check on copyright with vehicles, i dont think blanking the plates is enough (not my area though so not sure here).
Editorial use only images can contain visible vehicle license numbers. - do you take editorial? dont remember seeing it mentioned anywhere else.  It doesnt mention it in the areas about model releases and logos etc

you have "(found here)" for model release but it isn't a link

Forging a model release is a felony and a federal offense, and you could go to jail over such an offense. - in which country :):)

Finally I dont even know what I want hear here :) but as a contributor what are you going to do thats different? (apart from SEO that every single person who starts a micro agency says) I've supported albumo, unluckyOliver, geckostock, Zymm, etc. Crestock is on life support. We upload to a number of small sites such as cutcaster / yay / deposit but basically it costs time and money to upload I want to at least get the feeling that I will some return and say yeah this ones great :)

All the best, hope you do well
Phil





« Last Edit: February 06, 2010, 05:48 by Phil »

« Reply #6 on: February 06, 2010, 07:45 »
0
Thanks a lot guys

I have removed right side ad. Will update the site as soon as possible. Thanks for your comments & suggestions  ;D

« Reply #7 on: February 06, 2010, 07:59 »
0
cheap stock images.

we need your valuable  opinion & suggestions.

Don't sell our valuable content for cheap.

JerryL5

  • Blessed by God's wonderful love.
« Reply #8 on: February 06, 2010, 08:15 »
0
Have to say it's good to see helpful words here, instead of the old way.

« Reply #9 on: February 06, 2010, 08:21 »
0
Don't sell our valuable content for cheap.

Yeah, certainly not as cheap as this site:  :P


« Reply #10 on: February 06, 2010, 08:29 »
0
Heh.  I was more commenting on the "L" size for 3 "credits".

« Reply #11 on: February 06, 2010, 08:50 »
0
Heh.  I was more commenting on the "L" size for 3 "credits".
Sometimes I like to tease.  ;)
But as it is now, his smallest size will sell for 0.50$. The large one (how large? no info) will sell for 1.50$. He obviously hasn't thought about his pricing strategy yet. If it stays like that, I would (if I ever did) upload resized to M. Nobody in his right mind will upload a 21MP photo for 1.50$.

« Reply #12 on: February 06, 2010, 09:22 »
0
Heh.  I was more commenting on the "L" size for 3 "credits".
Sometimes I like to tease.  ;)
But as it is now, his smallest size will sell for 0.50$. The large one (how large? no info) will sell for 1.50$. He obviously hasn't thought about his pricing strategy yet. If it stays like that, I would (if I ever did) upload resized to M. Nobody in his right mind will upload a 21MP photo for 1.50$.

Hey, that's even better than thinkStock! ;)

« Reply #13 on: February 06, 2010, 09:43 »
0
It's not that bad. L is lower than 2 mpx. And I saw a pic with 5 mpx at XL for 5 creds. A 5mpix file will go as a medium for 6 creds at IS if i'm not mistaken.Not such a big difference.

« Reply #14 on: February 08, 2010, 20:37 »
0
tried to upload -- did a browse & selected 5 images, then when that failed, just 1 --
both times got error:

'The file has incorrect extention '[extension]  - yet these are jpgs -- the pahge however seems to indicate it may be expecting a zipped file?  if so, why? and why let us select jpgs?

also, looks like it requires a category before allowing upload -  meaning will have to upload many separate times?  is there an ftp option?

steve

dbvirago

« Reply #15 on: February 08, 2010, 21:19 »
0
Have to upload one file at a time or a zip file of images with the same, category and keywords? 

I won't upload to another site that doesn't take my metadata. I've done the work. Uploading should be painless

« Reply #16 on: February 08, 2010, 21:55 »
0
I find it interesting that your portfolio from "Weendy" includes files from two artists that I work with, and they are two different people. Note the portfolio here:
http://stockxpose.com/index.php?category=5&types=&search=&vd=date&c=all&items=100&user=7269&portfolio=1

File #7441 of the frog reaching out is by artist Julos:
http://www.clipartof.com/details/clipart/53928.html

Three of the dancing ladies (#7632, 7631, and 7630) are by OnFocusMedia:
http://www.clipartof.com/portfolio/onfocusmedia/dancing

I know for a fact that these two artists are completely different people. I dont think they would be selling their images together in the same portfolio under the username of Weendy.

This leads me to believe that you dont really know who you are working with. Who are your artists? Are they signing an agreement stating that they are to only provide THEIR work, not stolen work?

This industry is getting really scary. Who are you? Who are your "artists?" I'm worried for the artists and the customers...

Jamie Voetsch
http://www.ClipartOf.com
« Last Edit: February 08, 2010, 21:57 by jvoetsch »

nruboc

« Reply #17 on: February 09, 2010, 00:58 »
0
I find it interesting that your portfolio from "Weendy" includes files from two artists that I work with, and they are two different people. Note the portfolio here:
http://stockxpose.com/index.php?category=5&types=&search=&vd=date&c=all&items=100&user=7269&portfolio=1

File #7441 of the frog reaching out is by artist Julos:
http://www.clipartof.com/details/clipart/53928.html

Three of the dancing ladies (#7632, 7631, and 7630) are by OnFocusMedia:
http://www.clipartof.com/portfolio/onfocusmedia/dancing

I know for a fact that these two artists are completely different people. I dont think they would be selling their images together in the same portfolio under the username of Weendy.

This leads me to believe that you dont really know who you are working with. Who are your artists? Are they signing an agreement stating that they are to only provide THEIR work, not stolen work?

This industry is getting really scary. Who are you? Who are your "artists?" I'm worried for the artists and the customers...

Jamie Voetsch
http://www.ClipartOf.com


Let's see how quickly the operator of this website removes these obviously stolen images. The real artists should also be made aware and the agencies they are represented by as well so the appropriate legal action can be taken.

« Reply #18 on: February 09, 2010, 01:24 »
0
It looks distinctly to me that all the images may be stolen __ so whatever you do don't rush to upload there.

For example the fruit in ice blocks within 'truecolors' portfolio are by tforgo who is an illustrator, athough maybe has also become a fantastic photographer too. I'll PM him on IS.

http://stockxpose.com/index.php?user=7264&portfolio=1

Few contributors, all with small portfolios and every image fantastic stock. Hmm.

Maybe the clue is in the name of this 'site'.
« Last Edit: February 09, 2010, 01:28 by gostwyck »


« Reply #20 on: February 09, 2010, 03:19 »
0
So we have user Weendy with a port of 71 pics - which seem to have stolen content.
Then we have user truecolors with a port of 106 pics - which seems to have stolen conten

The total photo database is has 176 images ... hmmmmmmmmmmm

Here are a few more...

http://www.istockphoto.com/stock-photo-7651615-question-mark.php
http://stockxpose.com/photo/question-mark.html

I sent koun a message on istock.

and this one
http://www.istockphoto.com/stock-photo-4056388-splashing-water.php
http://stockxpose.com/photo/water-splash.html
« Last Edit: February 09, 2010, 03:26 by leaf »

« Reply #21 on: February 09, 2010, 05:52 »
0
How are they getting the hi-resolution image files.  I believe they are purchasing the image files with stolen credit cards. Since this business is run out of India, they get away scot-free!

TrueColors from StockXpose is selling an iStockPhoto exclusive image...

StockXpose: http://i50.tinypic.com/2wpo84l.png
iStockPhoto: http://i47.tinypic.com/2r7pqpt.png

Kenny


sites like heroturko, rapidshare etc?

« Reply #22 on: February 09, 2010, 05:57 »
0
I don't see how it could make sense for him to come here and advertise it which he did (he started this thread).

« Reply #23 on: February 09, 2010, 08:23 »
0
I recognize one of lisegagne's cows as having been uploaded by weendy.

Lise's on IS:
http://www.istockphoto.com/stock-photo-307100-curious-cow.php

On stockxpose:
http://www.stockxpose.com/photo/cow.html

I will sitemail lise on IS and let her know.

ETA: sent mail to lisegagne
« Last Edit: February 09, 2010, 08:27 by cclapper »

grp_photo

« Reply #24 on: February 09, 2010, 08:32 »
0
I do like the name of the site  ;D

« Reply #25 on: February 09, 2010, 09:20 »
0
How are they getting the hi-resolution image files.  I believe they are purchasing the image files with stolen credit cards. Since this business is run out of India, they get away scot-free!

TrueColors from StockXpose is selling an iStockPhoto exclusive image...

StockXpose: http://i50.tinypic.com/2wpo84l.png
iStockPhoto: http://i47.tinypic.com/2r7pqpt.png

Kenny


"truecolors" has a lot of other stolen ones as well.

lisafx

« Reply #26 on: February 09, 2010, 10:47 »
0

« Reply #27 on: February 09, 2010, 11:04 »
0


« Reply #29 on: February 09, 2010, 12:57 »
0
Quote
Is there a way to report this to iStock?

I sent a sitemail to lisegagne, but also sent a copy of that to contributor relations at istock. Where big name exclusives are concerned, they will be all over it like white on rice. And i don't mean to insinuate that they only help big name exclusives, because I asked for help a while back and they checked into a stolen image problem and responded. I just mean that they will be on top of it...especially if it's hurting big name exclusives.


« Reply #31 on: February 09, 2010, 13:41 »
0
No need to worry, If we found any stolen images, the user has been blocked and all the user content will be removed immediately.

« Reply #32 on: February 09, 2010, 13:50 »
0
No need to worry, If we found any stolen images, the user has been blocked and all the user content will be removed immediately.

Plenty of need to worry.  It appears you do not screen or check your applicants at all.

« Reply #33 on: February 09, 2010, 13:58 »
0
No need to worry, If we found any stolen images, the user has been blocked and all the user content will be removed immediately.


Shouldn't the portfolio of the users who are uploading infringing content just be deleted?  Are we going to have to go through every image and post links to other stock sites?

another one from 'truecolors'
http://stockxpose.com/photo/isolated-cauliflower.html
http://www.istockphoto.com/stock-photo-4093456-cauliflower.php



« Reply #36 on: February 09, 2010, 14:03 »
0
Ok last one.. from 'traveler69'
istock exclusive file from inhauscreative

http://stockxpose.com/photo/beer-mug.html
http://www.istockphoto.com/stock-photo-3973104-wet-beer-mug.php


« Reply #37 on: February 09, 2010, 14:05 »
0
Will that leave any left at all?

helix7

« Reply #38 on: February 09, 2010, 14:16 »
0

So does StockXpose get the prize for "Fastest Launch and Death of a Microstock Site"?

;)


« Reply #39 on: February 09, 2010, 14:22 »
0
Down to 9 now...

« Reply #40 on: February 09, 2010, 14:42 »
0
What is weird is you would think they would be stealing a little less-known images, maybe just as good in quality though. How stupid is it to steal some of the largest and well-known contributors' images and think you can get away with it? Somebody didn't do their homework.

« Reply #41 on: February 09, 2010, 14:44 »
0
The images should be starting to come down, I have been informed.

« Reply #42 on: February 09, 2010, 15:01 »
0
There is only 9 images left on the site.

« Reply #43 on: February 09, 2010, 20:11 »
0
9 images left on StockXpose, lol!

The owner and operator of Stock Xpose is Naveen Kumar (naveenfriendly), a 24 year old guy from India. Also, StockXpose is run on servers in Canada.

What's really interesting about this is that Naveen Kumar had his very own personal account on Stock Xpose... not no more. He deleted it! Why would he do that? Hmmmm, I just can't comprehend what he might have been thinking  ::)  http://i46.tinypic.com/35cpx12.png

What are the odds?! A brand new stock site... and almost all the contributors sell stolen hi-resolution image files by other artists who had no clue this was going on.

Please note throughout this post I added screenshots along with direct links to the webpages I referenced. I did screenshots so you can see exactly what I saw at the time of putting this post together. Naveen Kumar's "cleaning up house" so the webpages might not be the same... but the screenshots will ;-)


One of the biggest issues to note here is that StockXpose has already illegally sold image licenses. The following image that StockXpose sold stood out to me because it is supposed to be an ISTOCK EXCLUSIVE, yet StockXpose has sold it to one of their customers.

StockXpose:
http://stockxpose.com/photo/chicken-salad.html (screenshot: http://i49.tinypic.com/a5ggwo.png)

iStockPhoto:
http://istockphoto.com/stock-photo-1698083-buffet-food.php

go get em Getty!

What do you know?... StockXpose has a Flickr account and the 1 image they have in their portfolio was stolen from iStockPhoto's contributor,  Artur Gabrysiak (creo77).

StockXpose - Flickr Profile:
http://flickr.com/people/26400152@N04/ (screenshot: http://i47.tinypic.com/2eye7at.png)

StockXpose - Flickr Portfolio
http://flickr.com/photos/26400152@N04/4300718715/ (screenshot: http://i47.tinypic.com/29y32n6.png)

The stolen image in StockXpose's Flickr portfolio can be found here at iStockPhoto:
http://istockphoto.com/stock-photo-7692383-little-girl-drawing.php


Mr. Naveen Kumar (naveenfriendly) stumbled his own website, StockXpose.... take a look at his stolen profile picture as well. I seriously doubt he purhcased a license to use that image!
http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/stockxpose.com/index.php%253Ftypes%253Dphotos (screenshot: http://i46.tinypic.com/2lax10w.png)

Stumbleupon Profile
http://www.stumbleupon.com/stumbler/stockxpose/ (screenshot: http://i45.tinypic.com/2enrp55.png)


I also found that StockXpose runs another site called FreeImagesDownload.org which is very similar but instead of licensing images, they just give them away for free.  This site has many pop-ups which crashed my browser so I'd advise looking at the screenshots instead of visiting that site. They only have 50 images at this time.

Page 1. http://i48.tinypic.com/23jhl6t.png
Page 2. http://i50.tinypic.com/2pzbrsg.png
Page 3. http://i50.tinypic.com/11s1elk.png

Naveen Kumar has a personal account at FreeImagesDownload.org with 1 free photo.
http://i46.tinypic.com/2rptuzp.png

What an endless mess!

Kenny
www.ClipartOf.com

« Reply #44 on: February 09, 2010, 21:52 »
0
I love how quickly the group of contributors here exposed a total scam - and who says that forums such as this are just for venting and such?

« Reply #45 on: February 09, 2010, 22:38 »
0
I love how quickly the group of contributors here exposed a total scam - and who says that forums such as this are just for venting and such?


I thought it was just about "sharing" and hugging.

« Reply #46 on: February 09, 2010, 23:49 »
0
Guys for your information. We removed all the photos which you peoples listed in this forum thread.And also we banned that user for scam.

Thanks for your valuable suggestions & findings.


« Reply #47 on: February 10, 2010, 00:06 »
0
I love how quickly the group of contributors here exposed a total scam - and who says that forums such as this are just for venting and such?


I thought it was just about "sharing" and hugging.

Dear Clueless in St. Louis... :)

ETA the smiley just in case my dry humor was totally opaque

nruboc

« Reply #48 on: February 10, 2010, 00:39 »
0
9 images left on StockXpose, lol!

The owner and operator of Stock Xpose is Naveen Kumar (naveenfriendly), a 24 year old guy from India. Also, StockXpose is run on servers in Canada.

What's really interesting about this is that Naveen Kumar had his very own personal account on Stock Xpose... not no more. He deleted it! Why would he do that? Hmmmm, I just can't comprehend what he might have been thinking  ::)  http://i46.tinypic.com/35cpx12.png

What are the odds?! A brand new stock site... and almost all the contributors sell stolen hi-resolution image files by other artists who had no clue this was going on.

Please note throughout this post I added screenshots along with direct links to the webpages I referenced. I did screenshots so you can see exactly what I saw at the time of putting this post together. Naveen Kumar's "cleaning up house" so the webpages might not be the same... but the screenshots will ;-)


One of the biggest issues to note here is that StockXpose has already illegally sold image licenses. The following image that StockXpose sold stood out to me because it is supposed to be an ISTOCK EXCLUSIVE, yet StockXpose has sold it to one of their customers.

StockXpose:
http://stockxpose.com/photo/chicken-salad.html (screenshot: http://i49.tinypic.com/a5ggwo.png)

iStockPhoto:
http://istockphoto.com/stock-photo-1698083-buffet-food.php

go get em Getty!

What do you know?... StockXpose has a Flickr account and the 1 image they have in their portfolio was stolen from iStockPhoto's contributor,  Artur Gabrysiak (creo77).

StockXpose - Flickr Profile:
http://flickr.com/people/26400152@N04/ (screenshot: http://i47.tinypic.com/2eye7at.png)

StockXpose - Flickr Portfolio
http://flickr.com/photos/26400152@N04/4300718715/ (screenshot: http://i47.tinypic.com/29y32n6.png)

The stolen image in StockXpose's Flickr portfolio can be found here at iStockPhoto:
http://istockphoto.com/stock-photo-7692383-little-girl-drawing.php


Mr. Naveen Kumar (naveenfriendly) stumbled his own website, StockXpose.... take a look at his stolen profile picture as well. I seriously doubt he purhcased a license to use that image!
http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/stockxpose.com/index.php%253Ftypes%253Dphotos (screenshot: http://i46.tinypic.com/2lax10w.png)

Stumbleupon Profile
http://www.stumbleupon.com/stumbler/stockxpose/ (screenshot: http://i45.tinypic.com/2enrp55.png)


I also found that StockXpose runs another site called FreeImagesDownload.org which is very similar but instead of licensing images, they just give them away for free.  This site has many pop-ups which crashed my browser so I'd advise looking at the screenshots instead of visiting that site. They only have 50 images at this time.

Page 1. http://i48.tinypic.com/23jhl6t.png
Page 2. http://i50.tinypic.com/2pzbrsg.png
Page 3. http://i50.tinypic.com/11s1elk.png

Naveen Kumar has a personal account at FreeImagesDownload.org with 1 free photo.
http://i46.tinypic.com/2rptuzp.png

What an endless mess!

Kenny
www.ClipartOf.com




Mighty fine research there!!! I hope Getty makes an example of this guy, although he may have removed the content quick enough for them to get any traction.

« Reply #49 on: February 10, 2010, 01:48 »
0
Quote
Comment by nruboc:

Mighty fine research there!!! I hope Getty makes an example of this guy, although he may have removed the content quick enough for them to get any traction.


Guess what?

I just so happened to make a complete copy of StockXpose.com before Naveen Kumar deleted everything from the site!  :o

Quote
Latest Comment by stockxpose:

Guys for your information. We removed all the photos which you peoples listed in this forum thread.And also we banned that user for scam.

Thanks for your valuable suggestions & findings.


You act as if you are the victim Naveen Kumar, .... as if the contributors pulled a fast one over you!

Check out Naveen Kumar's  stumbleupon profile pic:
http://i49.tinypic.com/27ybtio.png

I highly doubt you purchased a license from Artur Gabrysiak (creo77) at http://www.istockphoto.com/stock-photo-7692383-little-girl-drawing.php.

Kenny
www.ClipartOf.com







« Reply #50 on: February 10, 2010, 01:56 »
0
Quote
You act as if you are the victim Naveen Kumar, .... as if the contributors pulled a fast one over you!

Check out Naveen Kumar's  stumbleupon profile pic:
http://i49.tinypic.com/27ybtio.png

I highly doubt you purchased a license from Artur Gabrysiak (creo77) at http://www.istockphoto.com/stock-photo-7692383-little-girl-drawing.php.


If the site OWNER is using an image that isn't even his own for a profile pic, and the image is most likely stolen, I am wondering if HE is the one that stole all of the other images and thought it out by putting them in different contributor accounts. That way he could play it off as if it were his "contributors."

I REALLY hope artists do their research before signing up with any new stock sites that are popping up overnight.

Jamie Voetsch
www.ClipartOf.com

« Reply #51 on: February 10, 2010, 05:41 »
0
Guys for your information. We removed all the photos which you peoples listed in this forum thread.And also we banned that user for scam.

Thanks for your valuable suggestions & findings.


As we say in the UK, you've got more front than Brighton :)

« Reply #52 on: February 11, 2010, 00:20 »
0
Hi Naveen,

I would love to hear how you are doing and what your plans are for resurrecting stock.xchng. Whoops! Did i say that!? Sorry Naveen :-[ I get so confused because your micro stock business name is similar to the well know stock.xchng (sxc.hu) site owned by Getty Images. What I meant to say was... how do you plan on resurrecting Stock Xpose, http://www.StockXpose.com  :-\

Best regards,

Kenny

helix7

« Reply #53 on: February 11, 2010, 00:23 »
0
...What I meant to say was... how do you plan on resurrecting Stock Xpose, http://www.StockXpose.com...


Is that even possible at this point? To me, the site is burned. I'll never touch it after this whole debacle. Would anyone?

Not sure there is much to resurrect.


« Reply #54 on: February 11, 2010, 00:36 »
0
StockXpose has a very good chance of success, ... but Naveen better have a wish left in that magical lamp!

Kenny


« Reply #55 on: February 11, 2010, 00:48 »
0
StockXpose has a very good chance of success
No he hasn't. His name is burnt forever. He was even so naive to let his real name out while registering a domain. He programmed a site (probably being a decent coder) and he filled it up with Heroturko or Rapdishare "free" shots to make it look decent. That shows how ignorant he really is. He has no chance in this field any more, not now, not later. He is done.

« Reply #56 on: February 11, 2010, 01:02 »
0
The sad thing about this is naive artists will contribute to StockXpose.com. One of the reasons I say this is because the websmaster of this site, microstockgroup.com, has made this very important topic only available to registered users! If you are not a member, you can not read this topic. It has been blocked from the search engines as well.  :'(

Kenny

« Reply #57 on: February 11, 2010, 04:43 »
0
The sad thing about this is naive artists will contribute to StockXpose.com. One of the reasons I say this is because the websmaster of this site, microstockgroup.com, has made this very important topic only available to registered users! If you are not a member, you can not read this topic. It has been blocked from the search engines as well.  :'(

Kenny

Hm... Leaf?

« Reply #58 on: February 11, 2010, 07:31 »
0
The sad thing about this is naive artists will contribute to StockXpose.com. One of the reasons I say this is because the websmaster of this site, microstockgroup.com, has made this very important topic only available to registered users! If you are not a member, you can not read this topic. It has been blocked from the search engines as well.  :'(

Kenny

Hm... Leaf?

fixed

« Reply #59 on: February 11, 2010, 08:16 »
0
The sad thing about this is naive artists will contribute to StockXpose.com. One of the reasons I say this is because the websmaster of this site, microstockgroup.com, has made this very important topic only available to registered users! If you are not a member, you can not read this topic. It has been blocked from the search engines as well.  :'(

Kenny

Hm... Leaf?

Ok thanks. Hope it makes Kenny feel better :]

fixed


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
50 Replies
17906 Views
Last post July 17, 2009, 21:31
by Eugene B
20 Replies
9997 Views
Last post January 25, 2009, 15:57
by shank_ali
13 Replies
13478 Views
Last post November 14, 2011, 21:01
by cathyslife
5 Replies
8331 Views
Last post July 24, 2009, 14:29
by cascoly
0 Replies
4420 Views
Last post February 26, 2019, 01:00
by FiledIMAGE

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors