This company with its code of ethics made far, far more millionaires of its employees and investors in the long run than the other company with conflicted insiders (chiefly the CEO), which had a good run for a few years but then stagnated and was sold to a competitor at something well below its all-time-high share price.
Very interesting observations, Chia, as usual. Will be interesting to watch and see if the above turns out to be a bit of a clairvoyant look at Istock's near future.
I suspect some of that stagnation is already occurring, hence the need for the recent "creative" ways of padding the profits.