I don't think so, but a google search revealed that a rear end eye is part of a spring in a car, so perhaps they were trying to do something with that and goofed in placing it in the CV hierarchy??

I don't think so, but a google search revealed that a rear end eye is part of a spring in a car, so perhaps they were trying to do something with that and goofed in placing it in the CV hierarchy??

Oh dear, I would have hated to see the results of that Google search! Your probably on some kind of list now! 

I wish iStock would drop the DA bit - it's a nice idea in theory but doesn't work in practice.  That one is especially bizarre.  The only thing I can figure is that some animals (e.g., fish) have markings that look like eyes on their rears to fool predators into biting the wrong part - rather have them snip off a bit of your tail than take your head off.  For example, many butterfly fish - here's one (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foureye_butterflyfish).  Also caterpillars, some moths, probably more.  But it's pretty rare and would be weird if it made it into the iStock DA scheme.