MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: Disambiguating old images?  (Read 2870 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

« on: May 02, 2010, 15:10 »
0
Hurro,

Is it worth the effort?

I've (finally) got with the reset of the world and started using deepmeta, and I noticed that it's a lot quicker to DA old images using it than the web site (no surprise really)

So, my question for the day, is it worth going through and DA'ing older images?

Cheers, Chris H.


ShadySue

  • There is a crack in everything
« Reply #1 on: May 02, 2010, 16:56 »
0
Hurro,

Is it worth the effort?

I've (finally) got with the reset of the world and started using deepmeta, and I noticed that it's a lot quicker to DA old images using it than the web site (no surprise really)

So, my question for the day, is it worth going through and DA'ing older images?

Cheers, Chris H.
Yes, of course. Why would you want to p*ss off buyers?

« Reply #2 on: May 02, 2010, 17:35 »
0
I would think it would be good, but I wouldnt hit the 'optimise' button :)

« Reply #3 on: May 03, 2010, 05:51 »
0
Is it worth the effort?

Yes, of course. Why would you want to p*ss off buyers?

I suppose the real question is whether or not it does annoy the buyers?  Or does having the auto disambiguation of an image push it to the bottom of the heap in the best match process?

Anyway, two votes yes, no votes no...  Looks like my auto-DA'd images have been voted off the island.


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
157 Replies
47192 Views
Last post December 28, 2008, 20:03
by Tuilay
5 Replies
3825 Views
Last post May 17, 2007, 20:15
by madelaide
2 Replies
5254 Views
Last post November 28, 2008, 12:18
by Peter
5 Replies
8276 Views
Last post March 24, 2009, 14:24
by zymmetricaldotcom
3 Replies
2993 Views
Last post July 04, 2018, 14:32
by AnS

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors