pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: free pack of beer!  (Read 5582 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

« on: May 28, 2011, 19:18 »
0
have nothing against IS (just the cut) I am having pretty good approvals there and I actually appreciate them and find them quite fair, and I do resubmit pictures every time and they are approved but this one is incredible, first time I disagree gotta say, the issue is "text on rivet"

I pay a 6 pack of beer to the person who can tell me the brand of this trousers! :P

p.s: got no Yuri monopod sorry

preview at 200%

« Last Edit: May 28, 2011, 19:55 by luissantos84 »


« Reply #1 on: May 28, 2011, 19:51 »
0
link?

« Reply #2 on: May 28, 2011, 19:53 »
0
link?

thats a brand? (I do see the picture here if you are talking about the "link")

PaulieWalnuts

  • We Have Exciting News For You
« Reply #3 on: May 28, 2011, 20:06 »
0
The position of the words is probably part of the brand. Kinda like you don't need to see "Nike" to know the swoosh is Nike.

« Reply #4 on: May 28, 2011, 20:08 »
0
That happened to me too. When some inspector saw a shadow, it doesn't matter if it could be recognized, the image got a rejection for trademark or copyright.

« Reply #5 on: May 28, 2011, 20:14 »
0
The position of the words is probably part of the brand. Kinda like you don't need to see "Nike" to know the swoosh is Nike.

are you joking no?? how can they know the brand?? it is not visible at 200%, not 100%, not 400%.. :P

if so tell me this one :)

« Reply #6 on: May 28, 2011, 21:03 »
0
yeah it sucks , some of the rejections for copywrite are on the conservative side even to the point of stupidity.

If in doubt Clone it out,
if your convienced it not a problem clone it out too.

The ones I hate the most are when you fix the photo then it gets rejected for another reason.

Atleast Istocks rejection reasons you can make some sense of them compared to others such as Fotolia

« Reply #7 on: May 28, 2011, 21:10 »
0
exactly, I have no problem on rejections, IS does a pretty good job on describing the reason but this one is funny, of course I will send it as soon as my slots open again :)

LSD72

  • My Bologna has a first name...
« Reply #8 on: May 28, 2011, 23:50 »
0
Best guess would be Calvin Klein Jeans. They use 3 word markings like that.

« Reply #9 on: May 29, 2011, 00:08 »
0
There is nothing strange or new about this rejection.  The inspector was right.

Even little details are important to prevent problems.

« Reply #10 on: May 29, 2011, 00:48 »
0
There is nothing strange or new about this rejection.  The inspector was right.

Even little details are important to prevent problems.

Really? What basis do you have for thinking this would cause problems? Do you really think a company could sue and win over invisible text on a rivet that might or might not be theirs?

The funny thing is that months ago I sent IS a note about a photo they're selling of a place I know with a distant crowd of people in it, including several waiters and shopkeepers that I happen to know and whose faces I can easily recognise in the zoom and they aren't interested, it's still on sale.

 

« Reply #11 on: May 29, 2011, 01:34 »
0
Nothing visible in my opinion. Very doubtful reason of rejection!

« Reply #12 on: May 29, 2011, 01:40 »
0
He was correct to reject !
I once got a reject for blurry writings on a SCREW (which was about 0.0000001% of the picture) !
A 3 minute work with PS will solve your problem.

« Reply #13 on: May 29, 2011, 06:19 »
0


brand of this part of a steam train made in late 1800's at 200%

ShadySue

  • There is a crack in everything
« Reply #14 on: May 29, 2011, 06:35 »
0
Way back when I started iStock I read a thread with someone saying s/he had had a rejection because if you zoomed in about x400, you could possibly make out by shape/implication that a zip on a clothing item was YKK.
Mind you, as posted here before, I had a rejection because a mark the inspector kindly pointed out to me was a possible issue. It was no bother to clone out, so I did, but when next I passed the place, I noted that the mark was just that - only a mark. So again, a needless rejection in my stats.
But it's all arbitrary. After my astonishing rejections for editorial asking me to put them into the main collection,
http://www.microstockgroup.com/istockphoto-com/am-i-going-nuts-editorial-rejections,
I had a rejection this week on a photo of a public  building despite me putting all the relevant details, i.e. that the architect and sculptor have been dead over 75 years. Dates of both included in description together.
Conspiracy theory again: there is some plot to decrease acceptance rate going on.
More likely theory: it all depends which inspector you get. Thinking of early copyright rejections I got, I'm astonished at some of the things accepted now for the main collection.
BTW, when asked about the yacht image in the linked post above, admin told me it was OK because it was less than 25% of the image. Isn't that a flawed general principle, as the buyer could easily crop any image so that a feature was 100% of the image, which is allowed by the terms of use?

helix7

« Reply #15 on: May 29, 2011, 09:33 »
0

Not 100% positive about this, but I remember hearing something about the rivets on jeans being protected by some companies. The rivet design may be part of their trademark.

« Reply #16 on: May 29, 2011, 09:39 »
0
He was correct to reject !
I once got a reject for blurry writings on a SCREW (which was about 0.0000001% of the picture) !
A 3 minute work with PS will solve your problem.

the problem aint PS for sure.. the deal is that this is not visible and I need to send it again :)

I dont need to tell that all other stock agencies approved right? :)
« Last Edit: May 29, 2011, 09:41 by luissantos84 »

Moonb007

  • Architect, Photographer, Dreamer
« Reply #17 on: May 29, 2011, 12:40 »
0
I think they go overboard too sometimes.  My guess is the inspector saw the text that you cant read on the button and rejected it for that reason.

 Nice Levi jeans though :-p

« Reply #18 on: May 29, 2011, 15:18 »
0
I think they go overboard too sometimes.  My guess is the inspector saw the text that you cant read on the button and rejected it for that reason.

 Nice Levi jeans though :-p

no levis :P

LSD72

  • My Bologna has a first name...
« Reply #19 on: May 29, 2011, 17:03 »
0
Was I correct ^


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
11 Replies
5565 Views
Last post March 22, 2011, 17:47
by Artemis
21 Replies
7089 Views
Last post February 18, 2012, 12:37
by cathyslife
13 Replies
5030 Views
Last post December 07, 2012, 05:04
by nicku
7 Replies
4251 Views
Last post May 20, 2014, 15:55
by Ava Glass
FREE BEER from iPAD

Started by No Free Lunch Off Topic

2 Replies
2413 Views
Last post March 25, 2015, 16:10
by noodle

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors

3100 Posing Cards Bundle