Agency Based Discussion > iStockPhoto.com

Getty Images Sued Yet Again For Trying To License Public Domain Images

(1/3) > >>

iStop:
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20190329/15352641901/getty-images-sued-yet-again-trying-to-license-public-domain-images.shtml

https://www.diyphotography.net/getty-images-sued-again-accused-of-profiting-from-public-domain-images/

SuperPhoto:
Yeah, unfortunately - they are allowed to do that...

When amazon first started becoming *really* popular (about 10/15 years ago) - a bunch of "internet marketers" popped up "reselling" books claiming to be a "new publisher"...

So they went to the gutenberg press (holding of public domain works) - downloaded tens of thousands of books, slapped their name on it as a "publisher", made 1-2 "edits" (i.e., commentary/intro etc on the book so they could claim it as a "new" book) - and essentially profited off of thousands and thousands of other people's hard work...

Video-StockOrg:

--- Quote from: SuperPhoto on April 05, 2019, 08:04 ---Yeah, unfortunately - they are allowed to do that...

When amazon first started becoming *really* popular (about 10/15 years ago) - a bunch of "internet marketers" popped up "reselling" books claiming to be a "new publisher"...

So they went to the gutenberg press (holding of public domain works) - downloaded tens of thousands of books, slapped their name on it as a "publisher", made 1-2 "edits" (i.e., commentary/intro etc on the book so they could claim it as a "new" book) - and essentially profited off of thousands and thousands of other people's hard work...

--- End quote ---

With this kinda logic, I can buy a movie, add some of my own shots and resell it as my own work?

Pauws99:

--- Quote from: SuperPhoto on April 05, 2019, 08:04 ---Yeah, unfortunately - they are allowed to do that...

When amazon first started becoming *really* popular (about 10/15 years ago) - a bunch of "internet marketers" popped up "reselling" books claiming to be a "new publisher"...

So they went to the gutenberg press (holding of public domain works) - downloaded tens of thousands of books, slapped their name on it as a "publisher", made 1-2 "edits" (i.e., commentary/intro etc on the book so they could claim it as a "new" book) - and essentially profited off of thousands and thousands of other people's hard work...

--- End quote ---
I think its not unknown outside this industry...people like "wordsworth classics" publish out of copyright works from the likes of Dickens. Reading Pickwick Papers at the moment ;-).

SuperPhoto:

--- Quote from: Video-StockOrg on April 05, 2019, 08:33 ---
--- Quote from: SuperPhoto on April 05, 2019, 08:04 ---Yeah, unfortunately - they are allowed to do that...

When amazon first started becoming *really* popular (about 10/15 years ago) - a bunch of "internet marketers" popped up "reselling" books claiming to be a "new publisher"...

So they went to the gutenberg press (holding of public domain works) - downloaded tens of thousands of books, slapped their name on it as a "publisher", made 1-2 "edits" (i.e., commentary/intro etc on the book so they could claim it as a "new" book) - and essentially profited off of thousands and thousands of other people's hard work...

--- End quote ---

With this kinda logic, I can buy a movie, add some of my own shots and resell it as my own work?

--- End quote ---

If it is in the public domain, or I believe it is 20 years for expired copyrighted works, then yes.

Part of the reasons you have 'oldie' radio stations, because I believe it is after 20 years, then don't have to pay royalties to the artists.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

Go to full version