0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Whatever, I think it is not a very scientific approach to use such discutable examples as a proof of the fact that exclusive contributors are treated differently than other contributors. I'm sure you will find plenty of bad pictures from non exclusive contributors.And frankly, I don't care that much because for me, if the photo is bad nobody will purchase it.You should concentrate more on building your portfolio IMHO. But this is just my own personal opinion of course
1. Nice job working in the word 'discutable'.
3. I would rather compete against great images than drown in a hoard of sorry images, which is why sales are so slow at places like Canstock. If a designer has to search through thousands of crap images, they won't ever SEE mine. On this point I strongly disagree with you.
And frankly, I don't care that much because for me, if the photo is bad nobody will purchase it.
Quote from: photojay on February 21, 2008, 16:223. I would rather compete against great images than drown in a hoard of sorry images, which is why sales are so slow at places like Canstock. If a designer has to search through thousands of crap images, they won't ever SEE mine. On this point I strongly disagree with you.I'm quite confident that search engines will show good images which sell before crap images which don't sell. I may be wrong however.