MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Poll

How do you feel about IStock as a company?

Strongly dislike
86 (42.4%)
Somewhat dislike
58 (28.6%)
Neutral
30 (14.8%)
Somewhat like
17 (8.4%)
Strongly like
12 (5.9%)

Total Members Voted: 182

Author Topic: How do you feel about IStock?  (Read 48122 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

SNP

  • Canadian Photographer
« Reply #100 on: December 13, 2011, 17:42 »
0
funny, one of Aldra's bestselling images is....a headset on white....blue flames. couldn't resist. amazing though considering the unbelievable creativity and beauty of other images in that port
« Last Edit: December 13, 2011, 17:44 by SNP »


« Reply #101 on: December 13, 2011, 17:50 »
0
Yep Headsets are fun :)

helix7

« Reply #102 on: December 13, 2011, 18:05 »
0
...Ford/Toyota/BMW haven't stopped bringing out new models of car and instead are diversifying into boats, planes or laptops are they? They try to maintain and grow their market share in what they are good at.

I'm not sure that's the right way to look at it. A Toyota purchase potentially takes a sale away from every other car manufacturer, because that buyer isn't in the market for a Ford or BMW once they bought the Toyota. Stock image buyers are always in the market for more images, but usually different images. Once they finish that headset project, they're on to a speaker project, a microphone project, etc., and need relevant images for all of those projects.

If I'm good at creating headset images, then sure I want a couple hundred really really good headset images to help me take a good chunk of that niche. But with a few thousand headset images I think at some point I'd only be competing with myself, and only for the attention of the fairly limited pool of buyers who are only ever looking for headset images. It's marketing yourself to the limited audience that only needs one of something, rather than marketing yourself to the wider audience that will be a repeat customer.

« Reply #103 on: December 13, 2011, 18:31 »
0
Clothes change, hairstyles change, office decor changes - from mad men formal to dockers and polo shirts in only a few decades :) Technology changes faster than anything - desktops, laptops, phones and even headsets.

Even if you do food shots, styles of plating food in upscale restaurants changes over the years; all those plates with finely chopped greens sprinkled like glitter give way to drizzles of some glaze, for example. I think there's probably a reason the agencies are looking for what they call "fresh" content in areas they've been serving for years. And so the Christmas expert or headset expert (or whatever) will want to stay current with the latest in that area.

Compare old and new of a similar scene:
 

When images start to look too long in the tooth, seems the person in that niche has the greatest incentive to do the upgrades.

Tryingmybest

  • Stand up for what is right
« Reply #104 on: December 13, 2011, 19:35 »
0
I would like to know if it's correct that "most of its users do still think reasonably well of iStockphoto" as stated on another thread. What better way to check if faith has been eroded in the brand than by a poll!

I think their upload/submission process is wholly inefficient. Their policies of whats "suitable for stock" changes with the wind. They manage us like we are mindless and their forums are toxic. For buyers they are also tyrannical regarding credits and their pricing. I get the impression that management is out of touch. Other than that, they are a descent company.  :P

« Reply #105 on: December 13, 2011, 19:50 »
0
Hi Aldra,

welcome to msg! I love your work, you are one of my favorite artists on istock. It is sad to see that istock is losing you.

But after all that happened in the last 18 months, it is no surprise that people are beginning to look elsewhere. Working with a buggy site is no fun, plus the lack of communication and most of all the terrible loss in traffic without any explanation - doesnt give the impression that the market leader is out to aggressively crush the competition and draw all the customers in.

I do hope they can at least fix the site, just a little stability, just one year of peace - it would do so much to restore contributor confidence.

SNP

  • Canadian Photographer
« Reply #106 on: December 13, 2011, 19:50 »
0
a poll is only as good as its sample group. a poll here is entertainment at best.

ShadySue

  • There is a crack in everything
« Reply #107 on: December 13, 2011, 20:00 »
0
I think their upload/submission process is wholly inefficient. Their policies of whats "suitable for stock" changes with the wind. They manage us like we are mindless and their forums are toxic. For buyers they are also tyrannical regarding credits and their pricing. I get the impression that management is out of touch. Other than that, they are a descent company.  :P
Personally, I don't mind the upload process, but I totally agree that 'mushroom management' sums it up perfectly. However, when we have several reports of contributors getting 10c or less for a sale, which is LESS than half what I earned in 2006, I think your statement about being 'tyrannical to buyers' is a bit of an overstatement, even allowing for the commission cuts to most/many contributors.

SNP

  • Canadian Photographer
« Reply #108 on: December 13, 2011, 20:01 »
0
Other than that, they are a descent company.  :P

your typo is Freudian...;-)

« Reply #109 on: December 13, 2011, 20:03 »
0
a poll is only as good as its sample group. a poll here is entertainment at best.

True. The internet is a pretty good 'sample group' though isn't it? Maybe the traffic stat's for Istockphoto are 'entertainment' for all those who resented their commission cuts. Wouldn't surprise me if there's plenty more 'entertainment' to come yet. "Your parachute is under your seat" __ as they say.

« Reply #110 on: December 13, 2011, 20:05 »
0
Other than that, they are a descent company.  :P

your typo is Freudian...;-)

Woo yay!!!

« Reply #111 on: December 13, 2011, 20:07 »
0
Hi Guys, I am new here, just want to introduce myself  http://www.istockphoto.com/search/portfolio/439280/?facets={%2225%22%3A%226%22}#1833ac55  .
I don't hate, love or have any other personal feelings regarding iStock, they made me such a nice amount of money during last 6 or so years that I can't complaint. But I feel that it is a good  time to take my portfolio to other agencies . I came here to learn something, since I was exclusive from the beginning and I feel like in "uncharted waters" for the moment.  So hello to all, and it's nice to be here with you.


Aldra . . . Just . . . WOW!!!!   What an amazing portfolio you have!!  I think you'll do well anywhere! 

« Reply #112 on: December 13, 2011, 20:10 »
0
Aldra,

have you asked Getty if they will keep your contract? Or maybe it is worth keeping your 600 Vetta files with them and not upload these to the micros? Or are the results on Getty itself so dissapointing?

Did anyone from istock contact you personally to ask in more detail why you are leaving or make an effort to win you back?

Or at least to thank you for the many years of excellent business collaboration wishing you well in your journey?
« Last Edit: December 14, 2011, 00:36 by cobalt »

ShadySue

  • There is a crack in everything
« Reply #113 on: December 13, 2011, 20:14 »
0
Other than that, they are a descent company.  :P

your typo is Freudian...;-)
Snort  ;D

« Reply #114 on: December 13, 2011, 21:51 »
0
JoAnn - what is your point? I apologize for missing the size of the portfolio on SS and DT...but you're just splitting hairs. My point is exactly the same. How can morphart give advice concerning lost IS income to SS gain-with JUST 17 files on iStock?

I certainly wish sodafish the best but I wouldn't expect income to be made up anytime soon.

For some or most of us truth matters. What iSt-oka want to I believe is not powerfull enough to convince me in they greedy *insult removed* game. Maybe you were in right time in right place and avoid touching TipToes but most of us are not. I really dont understand why you advocate this *insult removed* just from you own horse glasses perspective?

Dont worry be happy and start practicing Salute to Sun exercise in new year.

Ill been watching you, to how you delusion/s will evolve thru next year.

SNP

  • Canadian Photographer
« Reply #115 on: December 13, 2011, 21:54 »
0
But i just bought my horse glasses

« Reply #116 on: December 13, 2011, 22:00 »
0
For some or most of us truth matters. What iSt-oka want to I believe is not powerfull enough to convince me in they greedy *insult removed* game. Maybe you were in right time in right place and avoid touching TipToes but most of us are not. I really dont understand why you advocate this *insult removed* just from you own horse glasses perspective?

Dont worry be happy and start practicing Salute to Sun exercise in new year.

Ill been watching you, to how you delusion/s will evolve thru next year.

He's a poet __ but he don't know it.

« Reply #117 on: December 13, 2011, 22:04 »
0
But i just bought my horse glasses

So what you see thru it in my case !?

lagereek

« Reply #118 on: December 14, 2011, 02:04 »
0
Hi Aldra!  welcome to the ever exiting world of independants! fantastic port.

On another note:  there are so many high-flying exclusives leaving, I think we can safetly resume to the fact, IS,  is definetely losing it. At first one thought it was a flash in the pan, you knoiw, the kind of usual bickering but not now. Here are a whole string of really heavy contributors, leaving. DAD sign indeed.

Somehow I dont think the Getty/IS, hierarchy expected this.

CarlssonInc

« Reply #119 on: December 14, 2011, 02:29 »
0

...there are so many high-flying exclusives leaving, I think we can safetly resume to the fact, IS,  is definetely losing it...

Hi Christian. I must have missed something. I've seen a few (as in 2-3) "high-flying exclusives" recently publicly stating that they will go independent. I've not though seen "SO MANY" do it. Can you elaborate on/point out where this info is coming from - forum threads, blogs etc. or is this secret/private? 

Thanks!
Martin

« Reply #120 on: December 14, 2011, 02:39 »
0
Isn't it four or five out of the top couple of hundred? It's like watching a dam starting to break.
No doubt a lot of others will be watching with interest to see what sort of results these people report. If they do well, others will probably follow. If they don't, people will probably stay aboard the RMS iStock, convinced that she's unsinkable and can't have been holed.

SNP

  • Canadian Photographer
« Reply #121 on: December 14, 2011, 02:47 »
0
Isn't it four or five out of the top couple of hundred? It's like watching a dam starting to break.
No doubt a lot of others will be watching with interest to see what sort of results these people report. If they do well, others will probably follow. If they don't, people will probably stay aboard the RMS iStock, convinced that she's unsinkable and can't have been holed.

oh come now, "iStock = Titanic" references are so 2010....you can do better than that

CarlssonInc

« Reply #122 on: December 14, 2011, 02:50 »
0
Isn't it four or five out of the top couple of hundred? It's like watching a dam starting to break.
No doubt a lot of others will be watching with interest to see what sort of results these people report. If they do well, others will probably follow. If they don't, people will probably stay aboard the RMS iStock, convinced that she's unsinkable and can't have been holed.

4-5 exclusives going independent out of the top 2-300 contributors = 4,5/250 = 1,8%...hmmm that is a very small leak (so far).

« Reply #123 on: December 14, 2011, 02:52 »
0
How many top exclusives have left in the last 5 years? And how many of them have several hundred Vetta files in their port?

Plus istock loses all their new incoming work or cannot place it into V/A.
« Last Edit: December 14, 2011, 02:55 by cobalt »

« Reply #124 on: December 14, 2011, 02:53 »
0
Sorry, of course what  I meant to say was they would be convinced that the LZ-2000 iStock would float serenely onwards through heavily oversaturated blue skies, guided by its captain's steady hand, driven by powerful Hellfried engines, and could never encounter any storm that would make it crash and burn.
« Last Edit: December 14, 2011, 02:57 by BaldricksTrousers »


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
2 Replies
2541 Views
Last post February 09, 2013, 01:09
by Pixart
10 Replies
3867 Views
Last post April 09, 2013, 13:02
by wordplanet
6 Replies
2350 Views
Last post April 25, 2014, 10:35
by nicolebranan
7 Replies
4288 Views
Last post January 05, 2016, 16:55
by Red Dove
32 Replies
11061 Views
Last post January 10, 2017, 11:01
by Kokkoros

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors