MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: best Istock rejection  (Read 2771 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

« on: April 21, 2008, 18:08 »
0
Had to post this,
they're correct and i'm still misty eyed over the fact that they took the time to shoot me in the head so nicely (sorry, no "smily face with a tear)

** Too big a levels/curves/exposure adjustment in your RAW processor or image editor has created blocky posterization in shadow areas or has spread the color information out too much causing a degradation in image quality.**

Wow...a first for me and I'm in love with my terrorist/captor....(sniff)


« Reply #1 on: April 21, 2008, 18:11 »
0
C'mon don't tease us. Show us the pic!

RacePhoto

« Reply #2 on: April 21, 2008, 21:45 »
0
Stockholm syndrome, they won't give up the goods or testify against their kidnappers.  ;D

I'd like to see the posterized photo too, because I'm on the path to get this rejection some day when I slip and submitt something that I've wacked out the adjustment.

« Reply #3 on: April 21, 2008, 22:44 »
0
I know most of you dislike the "anonymous" approach, but it has saved me some battles that I would normally avoid (so no-posty-the-photy). My point is that someone at IS actually gave a detailed reason for flushing the image and I'm rather impressed as opposed to being pissed off. Just wish other reviewers (Atilla-the-Bugger) would take the time to be so gentle as they plunge their bayonet into your flexing chest while you whimper "please...the designers will "love" this".



 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
10 Replies
4715 Views
Last post October 25, 2012, 20:27
by Suljo
23 Replies
10617 Views
Last post November 03, 2007, 18:29
by hatman12
12 Replies
6661 Views
Last post January 07, 2008, 06:38
by Zirafek
2 Replies
3127 Views
Last post December 23, 2015, 19:39
by Hildegarde
3 Replies
3108 Views
Last post January 02, 2017, 18:41
by unnonimus

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors