MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: Istock vs others  (Read 18908 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

« Reply #50 on: September 11, 2012, 14:00 »
0


« Reply #51 on: September 11, 2012, 14:04 »
0
For whatever reason, my E+ images are not selling well anymore. A couple of days ago, one regular XS file only generated less than $1, while other XS regular sales will likely fetch more than twice as much. I have surpassed my current RC target but it will be nearly impossible to reach a higher level unless I have a lot of E+, V&A sales before the end of the year.

Reef

  • website ready 2026 :)
« Reply #52 on: September 11, 2012, 15:23 »
0
I never understand the animosity for those who think being exclusive is dumb.

Risky with potentially less earnings, Yes!

But they are not flooding the market for a short term buck.

« Reply #53 on: September 11, 2012, 15:36 »
+1
I never understand the animosity for those who think being exclusive is dumb.

Risky with potentially less earnings, Yes!

But they are not flooding the market for a short term buck.

But then again independent contributors are helping  to ensure a widespread market for our work. Handing over all the power to one agency (if we all went exclusive) would likely be much worse. Don't forget that Istock never paid anyone more than 20% until SS, CanStockPhoto and DT arrived on the scene and we independent contributors signed up with them.

Reef

  • website ready 2026 :)
« Reply #54 on: September 11, 2012, 15:46 »
0
I never understand the animosity for those who think being exclusive is dumb.

Risky with potentially less earnings, Yes!

But they are not flooding the market for a short term buck.

But then again independent contributors are helping  to ensure a widespread market for our work. Handing over all the power to one agency (if we all went exclusive) would likely be much worse. Don't forget that Istock never paid anyone more than 20% until SS, CanStockPhoto and DT arrived on the scene and we independent contributors signed up with them.

I understand that. It's a dilemma!

ShadySue

  • There is a crack in everything
« Reply #55 on: September 11, 2012, 16:31 »
0
FWIW my iStock RPD at the 35% royalty level is around $12.00. It varies. In June it was $16. I am not counting PP dls or royalties. I only put my slow sellers in there and it doesn't amount to a lot of income. About 1% of my port is V/A. In addition I make money for my files at Getty, which hopefully will go up after the E+ mirroring.

To balance that, my monthly RPDs at 30% royalty this year have varied from $3.72 to $5.52, which includes a bit of income I get from Getty (only a very tiny number of V, about 0.35%).  That's much lower than just the difference between 30% and 35%.
More and more often I'm hopping over to Sean's calculator when I see yet another low credit value sale. A higher than ever proportion of my buyers are buying with well under advertised price bulk credits or discounts offered  because of their cockups being disseminated throughout the web.
« Last Edit: September 11, 2012, 16:37 by ShadySue »

lisafx

« Reply #56 on: September 11, 2012, 17:24 »
0
I never understand the animosity for those who think being exclusive is dumb.

Risky with potentially less earnings, Yes!

But they are not flooding the market for a short term buck.

Animosity?  Really?  Can you point me to that?  I am not seeing it.  All I see is people debating the relative merits of exclusivity vs. independence.  Could you quote some of the "animosity" you are referring to?  Thanks.

« Reply #57 on: September 11, 2012, 17:37 »
0
I never understand the animosity for those who think being exclusive is dumb.

Risky with potentially less earnings, Yes!

But they are not flooding the market for a short term buck.

Animosity?  Really?  Can you point me to that?  I am not seeing it.  All I see is people debating the relative merits of exclusivity vs. independence.  Could you quote some of the "animosity" you are referring to?  Thanks.

Is it animosity for those who think exclusivity is dumb (the actual words) or from those who think it's dumb (seems more like the intention)?  I'm not seeing it either side of the fence and both points of view have some merit.

Reef

  • website ready 2026 :)
« Reply #58 on: September 11, 2012, 17:59 »
0
I never understand the animosity for those who think being exclusive is dumb.

Risky with potentially less earnings, Yes!

But they are not flooding the market for a short term buck.

Animosity?  Really?  Can you point me to that?  I am not seeing it.  All I see is people debating the relative merits of exclusivity vs. independence.  Could you quote some of the "animosity" you are referring to?  Thanks.

Did I also mention sarcasm and hostility :)  If it's not evident to you then I'm not sure anything I say or quote will satisfy you.

WarrenPrice

« Reply #59 on: September 11, 2012, 18:23 »
+1
I never understand the animosity for those who think being exclusive is dumb.

Risky with potentially less earnings, Yes!

But they are not flooding the market for a short term buck.

Animosity?  Really?  Can you point me to that?  I am not seeing it.  All I see is people debating the relative merits of exclusivity vs. independence.  Could you quote some of the "animosity" you are referring to?  Thanks.

Did I also mention sarcasm and hostility :)  If it's not evident to you then I'm not sure anything I say or quote will satisfy you.

As a disinterested bystander ... It seems there is a lot of hostility in many of the posts about iS... not just Exclusives but iS in general ... and anything/anyone associated.

but... I don't have a dog in this hunt.   8)

« Reply #60 on: September 11, 2012, 18:42 »
+4

As a disinterested bystander ... It seems there is a lot of hostility in many of the posts about iS... not just Exclusives but iS in general ... and anything/anyone associated.

but... I don't have a dog in this hunt.   8)

There are a number of long term contributors, exclusives, independents plus some like me who've done the indie-exclusive-indie shuffle, who are deeply angry with iStock. In my case it's fury at greed throwing away something really great - and some of that anger can spill over into impatience with newer exclusives who haven't yet had anything bad happen. IS's ongoing software incompetence - bungling every software upgrade (and I do mean every single one) and continuing to pick dreadful times to cripple site operations - is a pretty rational rock to throw at them.

 I think there's also a periodic burst of "exclusive content is better than all that rubbish on the other sites" which certainly doesn't sit well with anyone but a subset of exclusives. Probably not reasonable to assume that all exclusives feel that way about indies, but it has certainly primed the pump for some "full and frank exchanges of views" to become dust ups. There's a ton of ill will towards Getty that rubs off on IS more and more as it's absorbed into the parent company.

This is just me, but although I largely ignore what IS is up to these days, if I think about them too much I can get angry again very easily. Hearing all the positive and optimistic chat from current exclusives (who need to believe they've made a wise choice in picking exclusivity) seems to be very dismissive of those who got hurt by the past lies and about faces on a number of business issues. Probably isn't deliberately planned that way, but for anyone without the history, might take them by surprise.

On another forum (no longer around) I was told I was in need of a mental health evaluation for considering exclusivity :) Some people feel very strongly about spreading the risk and that's not anti IS, but they're the only agency where even considering exclusivity makes any sense.

WarrenPrice

« Reply #61 on: September 11, 2012, 18:46 »
+1
Yeppers... just agreeing with you.  There is definitely a tone of animosity and hostility.  Certainly not my place to agree or disagree with the reasons for hostilities ... just stating that I certainly feel the vibes.


Reef

  • website ready 2026 :)
« Reply #62 on: September 11, 2012, 19:16 »
0

As a disinterested bystander ... It seems there is a lot of hostility in many of the posts about iS... not just Exclusives but iS in general ... and anything/anyone associated.

but... I don't have a dog in this hunt.   8)

There are a number of long term contributors, exclusives, independents plus some like me who've done the indie-exclusive-indie shuffle, who are deeply angry with iStock. In my case it's fury at greed throwing away something really great - and some of that anger can spill over into impatience with newer exclusives who haven't yet had anything bad happen. IS's ongoing software incompetence - bungling every software upgrade (and I do mean every single one) and continuing to pick dreadful times to cripple site operations - is a pretty rational rock to throw at them.

 I think there's also a periodic burst of "exclusive content is better than all that rubbish on the other sites" which certainly doesn't sit well with anyone but a subset of exclusives. Probably not reasonable to assume that all exclusives feel that way about indies, but it has certainly primed the pump for some "full and frank exchanges of views" to become dust ups. There's a ton of ill will towards Getty that rubs off on IS more and more as it's absorbed into the parent company.

This is just me, but although I largely ignore what IS is up to these days, if I think about them too much I can get angry again very easily. Hearing all the positive and optimistic chat from current exclusives (who need to believe they've made a wise choice in picking exclusivity) seems to be very dismissive of those who got hurt by the past lies and about faces on a number of business issues. Probably isn't deliberately planned that way, but for anyone without the history, might take them by surprise.

On another forum (no longer around) I was told I was in need of a mental health evaluation for considering exclusivity :) Some people feel very strongly about spreading the risk and that's not anti IS, but they're the only agency where even considering exclusivity makes any sense.

It's understandable when put like this. I joined IS in 2002 so I'm not a newbie. I've only ever been a part time contributor and have only ever seen an increase in sales (generally speaking). Thus I don't share the 'bad vibe' feeling towards IS.

« Reply #63 on: September 11, 2012, 19:21 »
0
I am not entirely happy with what I get from my exclusivity and I don't think I owe IS any favor to defend it, but IS is still generating reasonable returns for my efforts.  Jsnover, you have been trying to be fair in most of your messages. I wish I can say the same about few other people who should really consider to have some more balanced and fair views.

AKK

« Reply #64 on: September 12, 2012, 06:15 »
0
I can really not give any advise about that. It's too personal as decision. what i mean by personal is that there are too many parameters, like kind of image in the port, uniquness, preferences of buyer in different site, approval rate, contributor character and life...

being Ex is a risk, you can win or lose, i my case my total earnings are 30 % more. before Ex my earning distribution was approximatively 60% SS, 30 % IS, 10% all others. I have little drop (approx. 10%) in my down probably due to the higher prices but the higher earnings make more than the drop. Also my E+ make very well, no drop in down. My RPD is about 7$.

Another point is that i'm very happy with my exclusivity but not with IS. I earn more than before Ex. but there are too many problems with the site and if SS give an Ex I'll maybe make the jump. For now I don't think to become independent.

Not: I become Ex. in april of this year, so even with the very bad time for IS i'm making more than before.

« Reply #65 on: September 16, 2012, 17:27 »
0

ShadySue

  • There is a crack in everything
« Reply #66 on: September 16, 2012, 17:38 »
0
If it can be of help

http://www.microstockjournal.com/real-value-istock


These graphs are only useful if you also give the size of your port at each, and the length of time they have been on each agency.

For example, there's a regular poster on the Alamy forum who constantly reiterates how much more he makes from his Alamy port than his iStock port. I don't doubt that for a minute: he has thousands of images in his Alamy port, and the last time I looked, fewer than 20 in his iStock port.

I'm not implying that your figures are so extreme, but there are certainly stats and 'useful stats'. I for one would be more interested in $$ earned at each agency than dls, but again it would mean nothing without the other details.
« Last Edit: September 17, 2012, 14:17 by ShadySue »

lisafx

« Reply #67 on: September 17, 2012, 14:00 »
0

There are a number of long term contributors, exclusives, independents plus some like me who've done the indie-exclusive-indie shuffle, who are deeply angry with iStock. In my case it's fury at greed throwing away something really great - and some of that anger can spill over into impatience with newer exclusives who haven't yet had anything bad happen. IS's ongoing software incompetence - bungling every software upgrade (and I do mean every single one) and continuing to pick dreadful times to cripple site operations - is a pretty rational rock to throw at them.

 I think there's also a periodic burst of "exclusive content is better than all that rubbish on the other sites" which certainly doesn't sit well with anyone but a subset of exclusives. Probably not reasonable to assume that all exclusives feel that way about indies, but it has certainly primed the pump for some "full and frank exchanges of views" to become dust ups. There's a ton of ill will towards Getty that rubs off on IS more and more as it's absorbed into the parent company.

This is just me, but although I largely ignore what IS is up to these days, if I think about them too much I can get angry again very easily. Hearing all the positive and optimistic chat from current exclusives (who need to believe they've made a wise choice in picking exclusivity) seems to be very dismissive of those who got hurt by the past lies and about faces on a number of business issues. Probably isn't deliberately planned that way, but for anyone without the history, might take them by surprise.

On another forum (no longer around) I was told I was in need of a mental health evaluation for considering exclusivity :) Some people feel very strongly about spreading the risk and that's not anti IS, but they're the only agency where even considering exclusivity makes any sense.

Very well put JoAnn.  Sums up the situation perfectly, along with some of the history that got us to this point . 

@Reef, I was not being sarcastic or hostile.  My interpretation of "animosity" is personal attacks.  I do see quite a bit of people extremely upset with Istock, but I have not seen a lot of personal attacks on other members, certainly none that I can point to in this thread.  Which is why I was asking for links. 

Poncke

« Reply #68 on: September 17, 2012, 15:29 »
0
Since I am new to the business, what happened at IS to PO so many togs?

ShadySue

  • There is a crack in everything
« Reply #69 on: September 17, 2012, 15:40 »
0
Since I am new to the business, what happened at IS to PO so many togs?
How long have you got?

Poncke

« Reply #70 on: September 17, 2012, 15:42 »
0
Since I am new to the business, what happened at IS to PO so many togs?
How long have you got?

I have time. But it might be too much to type up. Is there an old thread about this that sums it up?

ShadySue

  • There is a crack in everything
« Reply #71 on: September 17, 2012, 15:48 »
0
I don't know of any that sums up everything,but here is just one strand:
http://www.microstockgroup.com/blog-updates/from-woohaying-to-no-waying-(istock-in-turmoil)

« Reply #72 on: September 17, 2012, 16:02 »
0

There are a number of long term contributors, exclusives, independents plus some like me who've done the indie-exclusive-indie shuffle, who are deeply angry with iStock. In my case it's fury at greed throwing away something really great - and some of that anger can spill over into impatience with newer exclusives who haven't yet had anything bad happen. IS's ongoing software incompetence - bungling every software upgrade (and I do mean every single one) and continuing to pick dreadful times to cripple site operations - is a pretty rational rock to throw at them.

 I think there's also a periodic burst of "exclusive content is better than all that rubbish on the other sites" which certainly doesn't sit well with anyone but a subset of exclusives. Probably not reasonable to assume that all exclusives feel that way about indies, but it has certainly primed the pump for some "full and frank exchanges of views" to become dust ups. There's a ton of ill will towards Getty that rubs off on IS more and more as it's absorbed into the parent company.

This is just me, but although I largely ignore what IS is up to these days, if I think about them too much I can get angry again very easily. Hearing all the positive and optimistic chat from current exclusives (who need to believe they've made a wise choice in picking exclusivity) seems to be very dismissive of those who got hurt by the past lies and about faces on a number of business issues. Probably isn't deliberately planned that way, but for anyone without the history, might take them by surprise.

On another forum (no longer around) I was told I was in need of a mental health evaluation for considering exclusivity :) Some people feel very strongly about spreading the risk and that's not anti IS, but they're the only agency where even considering exclusivity makes any sense.

Very well put JoAnn.  Sums up the situation perfectly, along with some of the history that got us to this point . 

@Reef, I was not being sarcastic or hostile.  My interpretation of "animosity" is personal attacks.  I do see quite a bit of people extremely upset with Istock, but I have not seen a lot of personal attacks on other members, certainly none that I can point to in this thread.  Which is why I was asking for links.

With due respect, JoAnn and Lisa, I think prolonged anger sometimes affects one's judgement and fairness.  A calm and objective voice may deliver better credibility than an angry one.

« Reply #73 on: September 17, 2012, 18:39 »
+2

There are a number of long term contributors, exclusives, independents plus some like me who've done the indie-exclusive-indie shuffle, who are deeply angry with iStock. In my case it's fury at greed throwing away something really great - and some of that anger can spill over into impatience with newer exclusives who haven't yet had anything bad happen. IS's ongoing software incompetence - bungling every software upgrade (and I do mean every single one) and continuing to pick dreadful times to cripple site operations - is a pretty rational rock to throw at them.

 I think there's also a periodic burst of "exclusive content is better than all that rubbish on the other sites" which certainly doesn't sit well with anyone but a subset of exclusives. Probably not reasonable to assume that all exclusives feel that way about indies, but it has certainly primed the pump for some "full and frank exchanges of views" to become dust ups. There's a ton of ill will towards Getty that rubs off on IS more and more as it's absorbed into the parent company.

This is just me, but although I largely ignore what IS is up to these days, if I think about them too much I can get angry again very easily. Hearing all the positive and optimistic chat from current exclusives (who need to believe they've made a wise choice in picking exclusivity) seems to be very dismissive of those who got hurt by the past lies and about faces on a number of business issues. Probably isn't deliberately planned that way, but for anyone without the history, might take them by surprise.

On another forum (no longer around) I was told I was in need of a mental health evaluation for considering exclusivity :) Some people feel very strongly about spreading the risk and that's not anti IS, but they're the only agency where even considering exclusivity makes any sense.

Very well put JoAnn.  Sums up the situation perfectly, along with some of the history that got us to this point . 

@Reef, I was not being sarcastic or hostile.  My interpretation of "animosity" is personal attacks.  I do see quite a bit of people extremely upset with Istock, but I have not seen a lot of personal attacks on other members, certainly none that I can point to in this thread.  Which is why I was asking for links.

With due respect, JoAnn and Lisa, I think prolonged anger sometimes affects one's judgement and fairness.  A calm and objective voice may deliver better credibility than an angry one.

I don't think being angry at istock for pi$$ing everything away has anything to do with credibility. But you are certainly entitled to your opinion. I think JoAnn summed it up well and this sentence particularly applies...This is just me, but although I largely ignore what IS is up to these days, if I think about them too much I can get angry again very easily.

I totally concur with JoAnn. And it isn't the anger that's affecting my judgment or fairness. It's that many, many contributors' sales are continuing to take a nosedive. Pretty hard to be fair or not judgmental about a company whose greed has cut a lot of people's income.

ShadySue

  • There is a crack in everything
« Reply #74 on: September 17, 2012, 19:00 »
+1
With due respect, JoAnn and Lisa, I think prolonged anger sometimes affects one's judgement and fairness.  A calm and objective voice may deliver better credibility than an angry one.

You yourself said that your income is increasing at iStock. That's no bad thing, congratulations indeed. However it could be argued that thereby your 'more positive than average' comments about iStock are also not being totally 'objective'.
It's more difficult when iStock's business decisions have caused a direct and ongoing reduction in income, which many people have experienced.


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
5 Replies
13719 Views
Last post August 22, 2006, 15:49
by amanda1863
5 Replies
4069 Views
Last post October 27, 2006, 12:10
by CJPhoto
8 Replies
3927 Views
Last post December 10, 2008, 12:04
by lisafx
4 Replies
3692 Views
Last post April 30, 2019, 10:45
by trabuco
1 Replies
3695 Views
Last post April 07, 2020, 13:24
by ShadySue

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors