MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: January 2011 price adjustment  (Read 10648 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

« on: January 19, 2011, 03:19 »
0
January 2011 price adjustment just announced.


edited to try and fix the missing link
« Last Edit: January 19, 2011, 04:30 by suemack »


« Reply #1 on: January 19, 2011, 03:55 »
0
It looks as if this is probably a non-annoucement with hardly any changes. I stand to be corrected by anybody who has a copy of the previous pricing.

It won't compensate for the pay cuts most people are getting.

traveler1116

« Reply #2 on: January 19, 2011, 04:20 »
0
Really L for 15 credits, L E+ for 30 credits?  Is this right?  I can't post in the forums and the site is not working anyway, maybe someone here knows? 
I just saw LOBO said something about E+ credit "wonkyness", is that what this is.  He said it was fixed and to sitemail him if it isn't.  Can someone sitemail on my behalf if this is what he's talking about since I can't do that either.  Thanks.
« Last Edit: January 19, 2011, 04:22 by traveler1116 »

« Reply #3 on: January 19, 2011, 04:29 »
0
This is the price list .... see if I can get the link right this time

Prices

« Reply #4 on: January 19, 2011, 08:48 »
0

traveler1116

« Reply #5 on: January 19, 2011, 09:27 »
0
I looked at the forums but is anyone else having XXXL E+ files showing up for 50 credits?  http://www.istockphoto.com/file_closeup.php?id=13849807

traveler1116

« Reply #6 on: January 19, 2011, 09:32 »
0
Sean made a nice comparison chart on his blog
http://seanlockedigitalimagery.wordpress.com/2011/01/19/istock-pricing-changes/


On Sean's site it says E+ XXXL is 50 but the rogermexico link says they are 35, mine are at 50 now.  This is confusing, what is the real price supposed to be?
http://www.istockphoto.com/prices.php

ShadySue

  • There is a crack in everything
« Reply #7 on: January 19, 2011, 09:39 »
0
Sean made a nice comparison chart on his blog
http://seanlockedigitalimagery.wordpress.com/2011/01/19/istock-pricing-changes/


On Sean's site it says E+ XXXL is 50 but the rogermexico link says they are 35, mine are at 50 now.  This is confusing, what is the real price supposed to be?
http://www.istockphoto.com/prices.php

If there are different prices showing on different pages, they're d*mn lucky they aren't in the UK. We just love hitting big companies for this sort of thing.

« Reply #8 on: January 19, 2011, 09:39 »
0
On Sean's site it says E+ XXXL is 50 but the rogermexico link says they are 35, mine are at 50 now.  This is confusing, what is the real price supposed to be?
http://www.istockphoto.com/prices.php

Rogermexico is Istock's employee so I bet Sean's version is correct.

« Reply #9 on: January 19, 2011, 09:46 »
0
Rogermexico is Istock's employee so I bet Sean's version is correct.

+1  ;D

traveler1116

« Reply #10 on: January 19, 2011, 09:49 »
0
On Sean's site it says E+ XXXL is 50 but the rogermexico link says they are 35, mine are at 50 now.  This is confusing, what is the real price supposed to be?
http://www.istockphoto.com/prices.php

Rogermexico is Istock's employee so I bet Sean's version is correct.

I know I feel the same way that's why it's confusing.  Looking at the thread it appears Sean was right and rogermexico was wrong...

« Reply #11 on: January 19, 2011, 09:53 »
0
Sean made a nice comparison chart on his blog
http://seanlockedigitalimagery.wordpress.com/2011/01/19/istock-pricing-changes/


On Sean's site it says E+ XXXL is 50 but the rogermexico link says they are 35, mine are at 50 now.  This is confusing, what is the real price supposed to be?
http://www.istockphoto.com/prices.php


As mentioned in the IS thread, the linked to price page on IS is not actually showing any changes (so, incorrect), aside from the credit packages.

« Reply #12 on: January 19, 2011, 09:54 »
0
How many times in the past have they changed pricing? They should be well skilled at this. Unbelievable that they can't even get right something that benefits them! Rudderless ship of fools.

« Reply #13 on: January 19, 2011, 10:09 »
0
Is the Exclusive+ collection all the exclusive files that aren't Vetta? If so, it is another huge round of price rises on exclusive stuff, while independents are basically frozen for another year.

Whether this is going to help exclusives or not is quite another question but I guess the independents are the bait to try to bring buyers in and the Vetta/exc+ are the switch.

traveler1116

« Reply #14 on: January 19, 2011, 10:16 »
0
Is the Exclusive+ collection all the exclusive files that aren't Vetta? If so, it is another huge round of price rises on exclusive stuff, while independents are basically frozen for another year.

Whether this is going to help exclusives or not is quite another question but I guess the independents are the bait to try to bring buyers in and the Vetta/exc+ are the switch.
No E+ are a % of exclusive files, chosen by the contributor to be a higher price and get better best match placement (although the better search position has not happened yet after over 6 months since we were promised).

« Reply #15 on: January 19, 2011, 10:28 »
0
^ Was it actually a promise?  I seem to recall a sort of weasel-word expression that implied they might give E+ a boost if it was in the best interests of iStock, without it actually being a guarantee...

traveler1116

« Reply #16 on: January 19, 2011, 10:37 »
0
^ Was it actually a promise?  I seem to recall a sort of weasel-word expression that implied they might give E+ a boost if it was in the best interests of iStock, without it actually being a guarantee...
They said we would get the best match boost and then recently (Sept.) they said we would still be getting it.  But nothing yet..

bittersweet

« Reply #17 on: January 19, 2011, 10:55 »
0
oh lawdy lawd... why????

the whole site is falling apart. nothing is working right.

HEY! i have an idea!!! instead of fixing the site, why don't we change the pricing?... but only on some files... oh, and instead of posting a straightforward announcement showing before and after prices, let's be vague about what changed, and post the changed prices on a page than only a few people who have sufficiently cleared their caches and performed 6.5 voodoo rituals can see!

you, sir, are a genius!

« Reply #18 on: January 19, 2011, 11:00 »
0
As anyone noticed just how loooooong that list is too, what with all the different collections. What a confusing mess at this point.

bittersweet

« Reply #19 on: January 19, 2011, 11:06 »
0
It's ridiculous. Good thing they updated the logo pricing in there, huh?
 :-\

« Reply #20 on: January 19, 2011, 12:02 »
0
This is so wrong on so many levels.

Perhaps the biggest is that they spend even a nanosecond on implementing a price increase when search is limping along in a damaged state.

The second is that they raised one size of non-exclusive file - medium (5 to 7 credits). They raised one level of exclusive illustration from 14 to 15 credits. Why piss buyers off with price increases when the benefit to contributors can't really be all that great?

The third is that they jacked up all but XS and S of E+ files hugely and those files have a 6 month lock. So contributors who are supposed to have a choice in putting files in there find they're stuck with the new prices whether they like them or not. No warning, no get-out opportunity (although I posted that they should allow that through the end of January as a courtesy).

I added a post yesterday (promptly locked) that I now had a partner program tab (in my file_downloads.php page) where I had not had one before. I have never been in the partner program. I don't want to be forced into it. I sent a screen capture as requested by Lobo and am awaiting word as to why that's there. I'm concerned there's going to be some change in allowing an opt out for the partner program. They've just assigned someone (Echodelta) to manage all the Getty-iStock file movements, including the partner program, Agency & Vetta on Getty, etc. Perhaps there isn't another shoe waiting to drop, but given this price stuff, I think they're just trying to scrape up whatever cash they can, wherever they think they can...

« Reply #21 on: January 19, 2011, 12:02 »
0
It's ridiculous. Good thing they updated the logo pricing in there, huh?
 :-\

the what? 

;)

« Reply #22 on: January 19, 2011, 12:26 »
0
E+ price changes (based on KelvinJay's post and link):
Code: [Select]
M    15 to 20 (33% increase)
L    20 to 30 (50%)
XL   25 to 35 (40%)
XXL  30 to 40 (33%)
XXXL 35 to 50 (43%)

Wow.  Bet they finally give the E+ files the Best Match boost they had promised at the start of the program.

« Reply #23 on: January 19, 2011, 12:50 »
0
I don't think they should have raised any prices this year but we'll see what happens. I'll probably benefit from the E+ increase in the short term at least. The prices are getting way way higher than the competing websites and that worries me.

« Reply #24 on: January 19, 2011, 13:11 »
0
The minimum prices for images on Dreamstime:
Code: [Select]
ES   1
S    3
M    4
L    5
XL   6
XXL+ 7

The maximum prices for very popular images on Dreamstime:
Code: [Select]
ES   9
S    11
M    14
L    15
XL   16
XXL+ 17

So the largest size of the most popular image on Dreamstime is 3 *credits* cheaper than the Medium E+ file from iStock.  The credits on Dreamstime are also significantly cheaper (10-15%?). 

« Reply #25 on: January 19, 2011, 13:41 »
0
I feel it is time we retired the word 'microstock' from our vocabulary, at least as it pertains to iStock.

« Reply #26 on: January 19, 2011, 13:57 »
0
I feel it is time we retired the word 'microstock' from our vocabulary, at least as it pertains to iStock.

Could iStock have finally discovered the mythical and mysterious land that they call ... "Midstock"?

'Tis said that he who greedily tramples upon the hallowed ground of Midstock shall perish most quickly.

lisafx

« Reply #27 on: January 19, 2011, 14:19 »
0
Sean made a nice comparison chart on his blog
http://seanlockedigitalimagery.wordpress.com/2011/01/19/istock-pricing-changes/


Thanks for the link, Tyler.  And Sean, thanks for doing that comparison.  Kelvin's chart only shows what's changed, but not how.  Your chart was very helpful.  I hadn't remembered what a medium cost before. 

Appears the only change for independents (Main collection) is that mediums will cost one credit more.  Definitely won't begin to make up for the royalty cuts. 

« Reply #28 on: January 19, 2011, 15:30 »
0
I feel it is time we retired the word 'microstock' from our vocabulary, at least as it pertains to iStock.

Could iStock have finally discovered the mythical and mysterious land that they call ... "Midstock"?

'Tis said that he who greedily tramples upon the hallowed ground of Midstock shall perish most quickly.

Remember iStockPro? Yeah. That's right. LOL

« Reply #29 on: January 19, 2011, 16:04 »
0
I feel it is time we retired the word 'microstock' from our vocabulary, at least as it pertains to iStock.

Could iStock have finally discovered the mythical and mysterious land that they call ... "Midstock"?

'Tis said that he who greedily tramples upon the hallowed ground of Midstock shall perish most quickly.

Remember iStockPro? Yeah. That's right. LOL

well they couldn't get that to work, so they jumped in bed with Getty.  now look what it got them.. and us.  :(

jbarber873

« Reply #30 on: January 19, 2011, 16:12 »
0
    Maybe it's just me, but my head is beginning to hurt from all these changes, failures and sneaky switches at istock. Is it okay to upload yet, or are the files still going into limbo? Is it time to try Lagereek's recommended solution- a tall glass of scotch?

« Reply #31 on: January 19, 2011, 16:21 »
0


Remember iStockPro? Yeah. That's right. LOL

well they couldn't get that to work, so they jumped in bed with Getty.  now look what it got them.. and us.  :(

Looks like they are headed down the same road.

« Reply #32 on: January 20, 2011, 01:33 »
0
did the credit prices change much ?

If they increase prices I'd prefer increased credits per image as that would increase RC total.


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
9 Replies
3662 Views
Last post March 05, 2008, 01:59
by Argus
12 Replies
6284 Views
Last post January 12, 2009, 13:40
by shank_ali
45 Replies
16230 Views
Last post February 05, 2011, 11:28
by MicrostockExp
19 Replies
11228 Views
Last post March 03, 2011, 03:30
by RacePhoto
1 Replies
2762 Views
Last post February 12, 2016, 06:06
by eyewave

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors