MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: Keywords - I feel a rant coming on  (Read 9724 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

« Reply #25 on: April 08, 2009, 17:10 »
0
No it doesn't happen like that.  Contributors or buyers can denounce bad keywords or suggest better ones but it has to be approved by IS staff.


RT


« Reply #26 on: April 08, 2009, 17:28 »
0
What you're seeing is not iStock randomly rekeywording your images, it's buyers and/or contributors 'correcting' the keywords you used.

Yes but the way I understood was that it then went through the 'wiki' team who are meant to oversee and approve the additions/subtractions from your keywords.

 My own personal experience of this is that the majority of times it works out OK and I've been thankful for some of the suggestions, however amongst others I've had an image of a calculator on a white background whereby someone has suggested the removal of the keyword 'calculator' and it was then removed by the wiki team, and only this week I got a notice telling me that my image titled 'businessman walking a tightrope' (which as you can probably guess is a shot of a man in a suit walking along a piece of rope) had the suggestion of adding the word 'nobody' and again this was approved by the wiki team, even if they didn't look at the image the title alone should surely suggest to even the most uneducated person that the word 'nobody' shouldn't apply.

The conclusion I draw is there are people who suggest the adding and removal of keywords for vindictive reasons, also that on some occassions the wiki team don't even bother checking whether the suggestion is accurate.

« Reply #27 on: April 08, 2009, 18:34 »
0
I agree with Richard, I doubt there are a lot of istockers out there adding and removing our keywords out of the goodness of their hearts. Why would you waste your time?

« Reply #28 on: April 08, 2009, 18:54 »
0
There are some who seem to delight in it though. There's one person on this forum - I won't name names - who does it so often that he's earned a special red badge for all his hard work!

« Reply #29 on: April 08, 2009, 18:59 »
0
I also had an image of a rose in which "rose" was deleted.  A bit crazy.  I do wiki images sometimes, but only obvious spams (such as a blue satin sheet with "red" and "gold").

« Reply #30 on: April 08, 2009, 19:34 »
0
I do wiki sometimes, too - but only to madelaide's images. (grin)

fotorob

  • Professional stock content producer
« Reply #31 on: April 13, 2009, 09:01 »
0
Correct me if I am wriong, but if a buyer or another person corrects or disapproves of your keywords, you get a notification mail...

Bye, Robert

Milinz

« Reply #32 on: April 13, 2009, 09:36 »
0
Istock should publish two books:

Book 'How to use the right keywods for finding what you need' for buyers and Book 'How to keyword your images' for uploaders ;-)

PaulieWalnuts

  • We Have Exciting News For You
« Reply #33 on: April 13, 2009, 10:46 »
0
Did we lose another member to the ban button?

batman

« Reply #34 on: April 13, 2009, 11:30 »
0
Did we lose another member to the ban button?
hmm, i was thinking the same thing, but maybe that person just got pissed off and delete the account here. too bad, it's good to be able to shoot the sh#t here, regardless of whether you 're happy with the  response or not.  a good way to pass the time while waiting for your file to download, lol

« Reply #35 on: April 15, 2009, 11:59 »
0


The following keywords used for this file do not appear to be fully relevant to the subject.

{[ Golf Course (Sports Venue)]}

« Reply #36 on: April 15, 2009, 12:04 »
0


The following keywords used for this file do not appear to be fully relevant to the subject.

{[ Golf Course (Sports Venue)]}



The thing that bugs me too is if you want to send it to support to get reviewed again you have to wait like a month to hear back from them and you can only do that three times a month.

Of all the photos I have sent to be reviewed again they only ever overturned one once.

« Reply #37 on: April 15, 2009, 12:11 »
0
The thing that bugs me too is if you want to send it to support to get reviewed again you have to wait like a month to hear back from them and you can only do that three times a month.

Of all the photos I have sent to be reviewed again they only ever overturned one once.


The keyword was not the only rejection reason. They seam to have found some artifacting issues. I'll see what I can do and just re-submit it. Of course I'll use the keyword "golf course" again, since I think this was a mistake by the reviewer :D

All my scout images(all=3 or so) have been accepted after contacting scout.

« Reply #38 on: April 15, 2009, 12:16 »
0
All my scout images(all=3 or so) have been accepted after contacting scout.

That is pretty good.

digiology

« Reply #39 on: April 15, 2009, 12:24 »
0
Did we lose another member to the ban button?

right after he went black an new member signed up with the name "cevapcici"

mmmm.... wonder who that could be  ::)


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
a rant

Started by jim_h « 1 2 3  All » iStockPhoto.com

56 Replies
15592 Views
Last post February 28, 2009, 12:31
by yecatsdoherty
29 Replies
17251 Views
Last post January 17, 2012, 12:34
by stocker2011
12 Replies
4571 Views
Last post December 17, 2010, 16:36
by madelaide
22 Replies
6309 Views
Last post May 12, 2011, 17:24
by heywoody
8 Replies
4141 Views
Last post December 16, 2023, 05:45
by Jasper965

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors