MicrostockGroup

Agency Based Discussion => iStockPhoto.com => Topic started by: heywoody on September 17, 2011, 18:03

Title: PP query
Post by: heywoody on September 17, 2011, 18:03
PP sales are all subs @ 28c right (at least at the bottom of the heap)?  I seem to have had a single dl @ $2.36 - is this something like an SS OD or even an ultra ultra cheapo EL?
Title: Re: PP query
Post by: BaldricksTrousers on September 17, 2011, 18:12
PP sales are all subs @ 28c right (at least at the bottom of the heap)?  I seem to have had a single dl @ $2.36 - is this something like an SS OD or even an ultra ultra cheapo EL?

No, it will be a credit sale rather than subscription. There are also EL sales for a reasonable sum - $30 or $25 (I've had both) but they are very rare.
Title: Re: PP query
Post by: Jo Ann Snover on September 17, 2011, 20:04
You can look at the various "Image pack" options on both Thinkstock (http://www.thinkstockphotos.com/subscribe) and photos.com (http://www.photos.com/products) to see all the ways buyers may pay,

What you make is found here. (http://www.istockphoto.com/help/sell-stock/rate-schedule)
Title: Re: PP query
Post by: heywoody on September 18, 2011, 08:50
That's interesting - my tiny IS port doesn't generate enough volumes to have much of a picture.  So..  seems like there is a like for like in terms of types of sales with SS, DLs per image are similar and the return per download is a little higher in the PP.  What I'm having a problem understanding is how come the PP is considered so crap and SS is considered so great?
Title: Re: PP query
Post by: Jo Ann Snover on September 18, 2011, 11:39
The PP is seen by some (me included) as a way to transfer sales from a high royalty outlet (up to 40%, 50% on ELs before they took the 10% bonus away) to a low royalty one (20%). No RC credit for any sales via the PP, so over time, you have a harder time maintaining your higher royalty payments at IS.

It's about monthy return on your portfolio, and SS has been doing pretty well over the long haul with that.