pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: Quest to quit Istock - need honest opinions and experiences  (Read 940 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

« on: October 15, 2020, 08:27 »
0
How all of you istock quitters are doing, after a year or so?

I'm asking because I have been hating them for years... but still, getting files to upload only to one agency that still pays something every month (used to be four digits, now it's just to pay the bills) is kind of viable. It doesn't hurt at least.

I understand they are shady, greedy, no live stats, nothing to boost your desire to work.

BUT, seeing the poll results on this site kind of explains why many big players and lots of people still remain with them - exclusives reported 108.8 points in earnings. If you combine almost all other agencies, you will get to the same number, slightly higher. Meaning, you'll have to work hard to just catch up with what istock excl. alone made for you.

So I'm heavily reluctant at what to do. Seeing what SS and Alamy have been doing lately (changing models, owners etc.), I'm not at all sure if the grass is greener at the other side anymore. Except for maybe not holding all eggs in the one basket and having a live stat?

What did you do with all those MReleases? There's a ton of mind-killing bureaucracy work if they don't accept EasyReleases or past istock ones. What to do with old releases when trying to upload those files to new agencies? Some models aren't even available anymore to sign anything new.


« Reply #1 on: October 17, 2020, 03:12 »
+2
It is years ago that i canceled exclusivity at istock. Since i keyword in LRC it was easy to upload my portfolio at other micros. I must admit that i shoot mostly food. So there is no MR or PR needed.
About the earnings. There was not much difference between istock exclusivity and delivering the big five.
Its just more work. Nowadays there should be an advantage at istock exclusivity. There ist no upload limit at the micros. At istock signature collection there is some selection that prevent flooding the collection.

JaenStock

  • Bad images can sell.
« Reply #2 on: October 17, 2020, 03:19 »
+2
Dont quit.

« Reply #3 on: October 17, 2020, 05:00 »
+9
be careful. I am in a similar position than you. With over 20k assets at Istock and many E+ files going free would only make sense if you fit in a place like Stocksy with premium content. On the other side Adobe is still ok (still but you saw the free pictures move and as a public traded company the backslash will come at some point when their stock growth stalls, it is the name of the beast in nearly all public traded companies). Shutterstock, to much overflow getting a nice search position with images is nearly mission impossible nowadays. ig you are an ultra volume producer it might work out. All the others not worth it IMHO (not Alamy not Dreamstime not Deposit.......time lost for sinking agencies that might not be even here in 3 years).

So if you produce very high end images maybe yes if not think two times or three times before doing the jump.
Video is another story. I think staying exclusive with video is a really bad deal, Getty/Istock are far from being leaders in this sector and it would not surprise me if they let it go at some point as they did with RM and audio, go indy in video it will give you better rewards I think.
« Last Edit: October 19, 2020, 07:54 by everest »

« Reply #4 on: October 20, 2020, 13:55 »
+1
I. certainly don't have as large a library as yourselves but on a non-exclusive basis with 3500 images, istock always pays me more money than Adobe and of course now, shutterstock......or any other agency, unless I get that rare Alamy big sale.

« Reply #5 on: October 20, 2020, 15:06 »
+1
Sounds like you've already decided to stay no matter what.

« Reply #6 on: October 21, 2020, 17:22 »
0
Sounds like you've already decided to stay no matter what.

I didn't. I'm not a typical stocker, nor have a massive collection of assets. So... no. Unless I get accepted to Stocksy, I probably will remain here for good.

What @everest said made so much sense!

One thing you didn't say - what happens to past MRs done on paper for IS and Easy Release? Do all agencies require their own releases to be signed? If so, what do models do for people that are not exclusive? Sign like 10 releases? :O

50%

« Reply #7 on: October 22, 2020, 02:05 »
+3
I don't see any future anymore in deliver all the micros especially since SS did cut earnings! I think exclusive content is not a bright future but at least brighter. I'm with Stocksy this is not great but good and while all other agencies did go down in the last years Stocksy actually improved a little bit for me. And I'm considering going  exclusive with video with pond5. As I don't do combine shootings with video and photo it's not a problem with Stocksy exclusivity. iStocks artists exclusivity was always way too much for me to consider but if you have already all eggs in the basket I would leave them there!

« Reply #8 on: Yesterday at 06:42 »
0
I don't see any future anymore in deliver all the micros especially since SS did cut earnings!
At the moment i only have images at Adobe Stock.
Its more about the fun.
Earnings ? What the f.. is earnings, its microstock.

wds

« Reply #9 on: Yesterday at 08:29 »
0
Another factor is the type of content. I believe iStock does not accept certain types of editorial...for example product shots.


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
244 Replies
40271 Views
Last post November 29, 2013, 09:15
by targoszstock
13 Replies
2472 Views
Last post November 17, 2013, 13:35
by luissantos84
1 Replies
1901 Views
Last post January 31, 2016, 03:21
by Pauws99
20 Replies
4278 Views
Last post August 12, 2018, 06:51
by Pauws99
114 Replies
24004 Views
Last post July 14, 2020, 09:42
by ttart

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors

3100 Posing Cards Bundle