MicrostockGroup

Agency Based Discussion => iStockPhoto.com => Topic started by: heywoody on May 11, 2014, 15:57

Title: Seriously??
Post by: heywoody on May 11, 2014, 15:57
Have a number of images pending model release..

Some excuse here (as long as reviewing consists of a quick look at the thumb which is probably what happens these days)

(http://image.shutterstock.com/display_pic_with_logo/485545/108670097/stock-photo-rendered-image-of-african-tribal-hunter-encountering-passing-disinterested-lion-108670097.jpg)

but this???

(http://image.shutterstock.com/display_pic_with_logo/485545/108458912/stock-photo-cadaverous-winged-vampire-swooping-downwards-108458912.jpg)
Title: Re: Seriously??
Post by: Sean Locke Photography on May 11, 2014, 17:18
Maybe they meant property release for the 3d models.
Title: Re: Seriously??
Post by: lisafx on May 11, 2014, 17:47
Is it just me or is there something about the first one other than just not needing a model release?
Title: Re: Seriously??
Post by: ShadySue on May 11, 2014, 18:09
Is it just me or is there something about the first one other than just not needing a model release?
It's just you  ;) 8)
Title: Re: Seriously??
Post by: Mantis on May 11, 2014, 18:15
Is it just me or is there something about the first one other than just not needing a model release?

Long but very thin....... ;D ;) ;)
Title: Re: Seriously??
Post by: Erin Cadigan on May 11, 2014, 18:19
It must be the same reviewer who asked for a model release for this:

(http://image.shutterstock.com/display_pic_with_logo/96766/191419025/stock-photo-a-creepy-halloween-ghoul-decoration-191419025.jpg)

Title: Re: Seriously??
Post by: heywoody on May 12, 2014, 14:38
Is it just me or is there something about the first one other than just not needing a model release?

Classic  ;D

My take on flagpole sticking out of head...
Title: Re: Seriously??
Post by: dingles on May 12, 2014, 15:36
for CG work they require a release, basically a screenshot of the models in the 3d application and a line or two stating you created the models.
Title: Re: Seriously??
Post by: heywoody on May 12, 2014, 16:16
for CG work they require a release, basically a screenshot of the models in the 3d application and a line or two stating you created the models.
They don't - they (generally) realise the source and the fact that these items are licenced for commercial use.  Previously, when this has happened, I've uploaded a "model release" just stating that it's not an actual person.
Title: Re: Seriously??
Post by: dingles on May 12, 2014, 16:48
They have required a release for every one of my CG images and animations...the reviewers often say model realease, but they just want a screen shot and an explaination.
Title: Re: Seriously??
Post by: heywoody on May 13, 2014, 14:16
Interesting..  This hae happened only in the case of 10 or so images in may case & never had to submit any kind of actual property or model release