pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: Silver Exclusives invited to Getty Images  (Read 19583 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

bittersweet

« on: November 18, 2008, 19:17 »
0


« Reply #1 on: November 18, 2008, 20:33 »
0
Just out of curiosity, how are the current exclusives going with submitting to Getty? Is it worth it?

helix7

« Reply #2 on: November 18, 2008, 21:16 »
0
Must be a real valuable perk if the bar for entry keeps getting lower and lower. With Getty earnings expected to plummet over the next 4 years, I wouldn't get all excited about this.


jsnover

« Reply #3 on: November 18, 2008, 21:47 »
0
Once I have my new 5D Mk II I might consider trying this, but it doesn't seem to have much appeal. My 20D isn't on their approved camera list and although they take illustrations, I have no clue if or how they sell via Getty.

There are a few forum threads (mostly about glitches or slowness in the process) but not a lot of detail. One diamond said he sold more via Getty than iStock with a much smaller portfolio, so I guess it can be lucrative. I wonder if it's mostly about bragging rights (I'm a Getty photographer)?
« Last Edit: November 18, 2008, 21:50 by jsnover »

AVAVA

« Reply #4 on: November 18, 2008, 21:52 »
0
 Hi All,

 I to would love to here from the exclusives who have ventured into this with Getty. What kind of percentage do they offer. Is it the same as your Micro percentage or different. Do they make the edits and do you find them tight or loose. Is the upload easy compared to Micro. How are your sales per image compared to your Micro work. Do you send them your very best work or possibly even do shoots specifically for the Macro collections. Any info would be very helpful.

Thanks,
AVAVA

bittersweet

« Reply #5 on: November 18, 2008, 22:11 »
0
Must be a real valuable perk if the bar for entry keeps getting lower and lower.

Don't know if it's anything to get excited about or not, but this should not be considered "lowering the bar". The plan to add silvers to the program after things were rolling smoothly with the golds and diamonds was announced last summer.
« Last Edit: November 24, 2008, 02:01 by whatalife »

« Reply #6 on: November 18, 2008, 22:58 »
0
Hi All,

 I to would love to here from the exclusives who have ventured into this with Getty. What kind of percentage do they offer. Is it the same as your Micro percentage or different. Do they make the edits and do you find them tight or loose. Is the upload easy compared to Micro. How are your sales per image compared to your Micro work. Do you send them your very best work or possibly even do shoots specifically for the Macro collections. Any info would be very helpful.

Thanks,
AVAVA

It's the same as anyone else contributing to the Getty Photodisc collection.  Nothing special for us.

helix7

« Reply #7 on: November 18, 2008, 23:03 »
0
Don't know if it's anything to get excited about or not, but this should not be considered "lowering the bar". The plan has always been to add silvers to the program after things were rolling smoothly with the golds and diamonds. They told us that when they first unveiled the program.

I thought they only announced Diamond and Gold initially. Could be wrong, though. I'll take your word for it on that one.

Just seems sort of odd that they're inviting people into a clearly loosing venture. Getty themselves acknowledge the significant dip their sales will take over the next few years, and the dramatic increase istock sales will see. If I'm a betting man and were exclusive at istock, I'd be putting my bets on istock and keeping my images there.

That's just me though. If the Getty deal is working out for people, good on ya. Take advantage while there's still something to take advantage of.



AVAVA

« Reply #8 on: November 19, 2008, 00:46 »
0
Thanks for that Sean,

 Can anyone add anything else. Any answers to the other questions. I personally still see a higher yearly return in my Macro RF RPI than I do for any Micro producer ( Yuri included ). Sales dropped off a couple of years ago ( from what used to be an insane return per dollar invested, 15X return ) but they have leveled off and even increased over the past year in certain collections. Macro RF images may not make a 15x return anymore but they are still making good returns if the production value is there and they are in the right collection. There is a great deal of talk about the death of RF Macro in the industry but it still has some legs. See how much money it is expected to actually make Getty over the next 4 years compared to Micro. The growth might be in Micro by % but the dollars are still stronger in Macro RF even with the expected decline, even 4 years from now. Getty released an estimate of their income up through 2012 that show this to be true.

  If Yuri's entire collection was in Macro RF since he joined Micro he would have made more money than he has in Micro. OOOH! I said it. Should I post that ::) It is true at least basing it off my own Macro RF sales during that same time period and what Yuri has offered about his own sales during that time frame in Micro.

A big part of the equation for me is is how much do you spend to how much you make per image, that is one of the most important ratios in this business but it can't overpower all other decision making. One of the struggles I am dealing with at the moment is keeping costs down to prepare for the upcoming drop off in advertising dollars over the coming year while at the same time keeping the production quality up to compete with this tough creative market. Also where is the best investment per dollar for return in stock over the next year or two. Is it Micro, RM, RR maybe the right Macro RF collection. The million dollar question. I Know where I am rolling my dice this next year and from this post it might not be where you would expect.

 I think to have the chance to move your way up the ladder through Getty Macro into other collections is probably the most enticing part of their Exclusive offer but I don't feel like that is what I am sensing here. Maybe I am wrong, any feedback would be great!

Thanks,
AVAVA
« Last Edit: November 19, 2008, 00:47 by AVAVA »

lagereek

« Reply #9 on: November 19, 2008, 03:48 »
0
Sean is right!

When he says nothing special, true. As far as climbing the ladder in the Macro Getty, especially the RM sector? yes if you can spend 15K a month in tailormaking the shots with Pro-models, elaborate props and god knows, well then you might have a small chance. It costs money to generate money.
When I came from Stones and TIB back in late 80s into Getty it was a differant ball-game and I must say, we had a tremendous 4 or 5 years, it was really booming. Ever since, slowly, slowly, its gone more and more quiet.
The secret behind success within the Getty RM is to be one of the choosen ones for commissioned work, rigging up the perfect stock-shots.

best.  Christian

AVAVA

« Reply #10 on: November 19, 2008, 10:45 »
0
Hey Christian,

 I heard that when I first started doing commercial work 20 years ago. The market was over saturated we were looking at a recession ( before the DotCom Boom ) and we were told that you won't survive in this market. We had 10K saved and built a thriving business in the middle of chaos from a glorified garage. I heard the same thing when RF started 10 years ago that stock was surely dead but we changed our market from commercial to stock at that time and turned stock into a seven figure income.

 I had a tour of a famous stock photographers studio back in college in the 80's. I stood in his 10,000 sq. ft. studio in complete awe as he proceeded to tell us that we could never compete in the stock market and that it was to expensive a game to get into now that it was controlled by the big boys. I went home from that day very discouraged, look how wrong he turned out to be. It is a hard game to play but I am no one special and I think if anyone still wants to work their way up the ladder it will always be possible. A solid education is a good start but look at Chase Jarvis he is self taught and doing very well in the commercial marketplace so there are still ladders to the top even bypassing school.

 That famous stock photographer from my class tour has since passed on and guess who took his place. Especially Lifestyle Stock. It needs replacing every 5-7 years due to lifestyle changes in society. Eventually both you and I are going to quit or die someone will have to make those images that we won't be making anymore and I believe everyone here has a chance. You just have to want it enough.

Best,
AVAVA

« Reply #11 on: November 19, 2008, 11:07 »
0
Jonathan,
 You are truely a optimist and a very knowledgeable person.. It's nice to have some opinions other than the end of stock is coming.. keeps us ones that are striving to get a small place in the market going..  ;D

I'm sure RM is always going to have a place as marketing people don't always like to know there are hundreds of the same image floating around the world in circulation.. Hopefully Macro RM and Micro RF can both evolve into something beneficial for all.. Change is good as long as we all stick up for ourselves and our industry and make sure there are checks and balances.. Even the all hailed Getty is subject to contributor participation, they too would fall if everyone stuck together to denounce them if they pulled a fast one or something.. But If we are not together they have full control. So Long rant short we run the show if we want to.. We can mold our industry through hard work, integrity and working together.. Kumbayaa, kumbayaa, yada, yada, yada..

Hey Christian,

 I heard that when I first started doing commercial work 20 years ago. The market was over saturated we were looking at a recession ( before the DotCom Boom ) and we were told that you won't survive in this market. We had 10K saved and built a thriving business in the middle of chaos from a glorified garage. I heard the same thing when RF started 10 years ago that stock was surely dead but we changed our market from commercial to stock at that time and turned stock into a seven figure income.

 I had a tour of a famous stock photographers studio back in college in the 80's. I stood in his 10,000 sq. ft. studio in complete awe as he proceeded to tell us that we could never compete in the stock market and that it was to expensive a game to get into now that it was controlled by the big boys. I went home from that day very discouraged, look how wrong he turned out to be. It is a hard game to play but I am no one special and I think if anyone still wants to work their way up the ladder it will always be possible. A solid education is a good start but look at Chase Jarvis he is self taught and doing very well in the commercial marketplace so there are still ladders to the top even bypassing school.

 That famous stock photographer from my class tour has since passed on and guess who took his place. Especially Lifestyle Stock. It needs replacing every 5-7 years due to lifestyle changes in society. Eventually both you and I are going to quit or die someone will have to make those images that we won't be making anymore and I believe everyone here has a chance. You just have to want it enough.

Best,
AVAVA

« Reply #12 on: November 19, 2008, 11:24 »
0
I only have 2nd hand knowledge of the experience. Some contributors have complained about .25 cent commissions on Getty images which were countered by other contributors stating that those are equaled out with $30 or $40 commissions. Your not going to see a lot of issues in the main IS forums for the same reason that you don't see anything but good comments about exclusivity there. Each group has their own forums so that problems can be hashed out behind closed doors.

I've also heard that you can upload an image to one or the other, not both.

« Reply #13 on: November 19, 2008, 11:28 »
0
So if I understand this invitation correctly. Getty will use my existing portfolio - the duds and marginal work included - to decide if I can provide them with new shots that are not at Istock.Am I assuming correctly that this invitation still does not get me into editorial RM with Getty (non model or property released location/news/product shots)?

I just can not find what sort of pictures Getty expects.

Thanks

AVAVA

« Reply #14 on: November 19, 2008, 11:31 »
0
Hi Tubed,

 I am glad you are optimistic about your future, you should be. There is a great comedy special by Cat Williams that talks about keeping yourself pumped up because ain't nobody else gonna do it for you. Just want to make sure you didn't read more into what I said than I meant.
 It is important in your relationship with your distributors that you play by their rules when on their field and show up with a teamwork mentality. Suggestions to your editor or photographer relations I feel should be approached as a team effort. That doesn't mean you can't get frustrated and bitch sometimes, I think we all have to some point if we are passionate about our work. Just remember it is a symbiotic relationship we both need each other.
 Stay pumped up about your future and pass that energy on to the next guy. Thanks for the morning energy boost always good to start the day.

Best,
Jonathan

AVAVA

« Reply #15 on: November 19, 2008, 11:53 »
0
Hi there azurelaroux and Read_My_Rights,

 They will not put your micro work up or your similars from any other shoots you ave produced for another collection. The work you shoot for Getty Macro will be only for Getty Macro and they will do the editing. They usually like you to go through and edit down to the best from a scenario so you don't send them poor shots to slow the edit process.

 I am at Getty through the old school style so if there is someone that has become a Getty contributor through Istock they might be able to answer your questions better than I can.

 There are some very small download prices on my Getty statement. Getty allows certain industries to get a break on the image depending on the use. This is not a standard commercial sale. A good example would be a school district or nonprofit company needing use of an image for a specific reason.

 I must say I was not excited when I first saw a .25 cent sale on my Getty statement but I try not to look at individual sales as much as I do return per shoot. We used to follow RPI " return per image " but we are finding " Return Per Shoot " to be a better gauge and track of success and sales returns as each shoot ranges quite a bit in per image cost depending on several factors. One being the collection or business model the images will be placed in RM, RR, Macro RF or Micro RF.

Hope this helps,
Jonathan
« Last Edit: November 19, 2008, 11:55 by AVAVA »

RacePhoto

« Reply #16 on: November 19, 2008, 12:13 »
0

It's the same as anyone else contributing to the Getty Photodisc collection.  Nothing special for us.



Read what Sean says carefully.

http://www.gettyimages.com/creative/frontdoor/photodisc?country=usa

Have to agree that people have their eyes popping out, Oh I can get my images on Getty now. It's acceptance for the Photodisc collection. Nice for more sales maybe and more distribution to one more Micro site, but it's not the editorial or RM section.

Maybe someone who has been with this since the Diamond days can provide some data on sales?

AVAVA

« Reply #17 on: November 19, 2008, 12:19 »
0
Hi Race,

 The link didn't take me anywhere. Could you copy and paste the info it might be useful for some with questions. Also Photodisc is where I first started with Getty I now have contracts with all models they offer, even with Stone. It is called working your way up the ladder, hard work but fun compared to coal mining or a real job.

Thx,
Jonathan
« Last Edit: November 19, 2008, 12:21 by AVAVA »

lagereek

« Reply #18 on: November 19, 2008, 12:27 »
0
Hey Christian,

 I heard that when I first started doing commercial work 20 years ago. The market was over saturated we were looking at a recession ( before the DotCom Boom ) and we were told that you won't survive in this market. We had 10K saved and built a thriving business in the middle of chaos from a glorified garage. I heard the same thing when RF started 10 years ago that stock was surely dead but we changed our market from commercial to stock at that time and turned stock into a seven figure income.

 I had a tour of a famous stock photographers studio back in college in the 80's. I stood in his 10,000 sq. ft. studio in complete awe as he proceeded to tell us that we could never compete in the stock market and that it was to expensive a game to get into now that it was controlled by the big boys. I went home from that day very discouraged, look how wrong he turned out to be. It is a hard game to play but I am no one special and I think if anyone still wants to work their way up the ladder it will always be possible. A solid education is a good start but look at Chase Jarvis he is self taught and doing very well in the commercial marketplace so there are still ladders to the top even bypassing school.

 That famous stock photographer from my class tour has since passed on and guess who took his place. Especially Lifestyle Stock. It needs replacing every 5-7 years due to lifestyle changes in society. Eventually both you and I are going to quit or die someone will have to make those images that we won't be making anymore and I believe everyone here has a chance. You just have to want it enough.

Best,
AVAVA



Nice story Jonathan! lets keep em coming!  Oh! BTW, shall we all here start our own Micro, RF or RM??
Its about bloody time. We CAN build Rome in two days. Sean throws in all his lifestyles, he will outclass Yuri.
« Last Edit: November 19, 2008, 12:29 by lagereek »

bittersweet

« Reply #19 on: November 19, 2008, 12:31 »
0

It's the same as anyone else contributing to the Getty Photodisc collection.  Nothing special for us.



Read what Sean says carefully.

http://www.gettyimages.com/creative/frontdoor/photodisc?country=usa

Have to agree that people have their eyes popping out, Oh I can get my images on Getty now. It's acceptance for the Photodisc collection. Nice for more sales maybe and more distribution to one more Micro site, but it's not the editorial or RM section.


I think Sean was simply clarifying that there is no special compensation deal for istockers, they get the same as everyone else who submits to Photodisc.

I don't know why people are assuming that it is RM or editorial. That is not said anywhere. It is not "one more Micro site" though. I don't understand that statement. Photodisc is searchable as part of Getty's entire RF collection, as well as across numerous other sites where Photodisc images are sold (including Veer). Maybe if exclusives were already able to sell their images on 20 or so other venues, it would not be a big deal, but that is not the case. Opening up the market considerably for exclusives is a bigger deal than some seem to want to admit (for reasons that escape me).

And Jonathan, I will second what Tubed said, you are like a breath of fresh air. I don't get why some people have to be so negative all the time.

AVAVA

« Reply #20 on: November 19, 2008, 12:45 »
0
Hi Christian,

 Thanks I enjoy the banter a great deal. I do like to see the glass half full ( you pick what it is filled with  ;D ) I enjoy the community here a great deal. I agree, I am a bit surprised how this opportunity is being viewed by some. It isn't just that another Micro opportunity. Until you spend the time and effort to see results you will never know. Diversify people... PLEASE!

Peace,
J

RacePhoto

« Reply #21 on: November 19, 2008, 16:19 »
0
It wasn't negative it was pointing out the fact that it was the Photodisc collection, not the major Getty collection. You can see that as positive or negative. It's another Micro site, which under the wing of Getty may be a very good deal. It's not the Getty Editorial and RM site. Just the facts...

Link works for me, but maybe it's because of the USA part and it's blocking people from some other countries? Sorry about that, but I'm limited by their servers. I chopped off the usa part, which may or may not do the trick.

http://www.gettyimages.com/creative/frontdoor/photodisc?

It's a good thing to get accepted at Photodisc, as a reward, as an exclusive, because you achieved Silver at IS. Can people go and join Photodisc and submit photos without being exclusive at IS and being Silver?

Remember this one from July?  Selected Flickr photographers now on Getty.

Getty editors will use a set of tools jointly developed by the two companies that will enable them to easily scan through Flickr photos to find the best of the crop. Each selected member will have their images licensed through a special Flickr-branded section of Gettys site, and will receive portions of the licensing fees collected by Getty (there is no set payout structure - each selected participant in the program will need to negotiate their own deal with Getty).

But there was a question. Are any of the Diamonds and gold members seeing any sales through Photodisc since they were included in this special offer?

I was writing while whatalife was writing, yes, bottom line we agree. Go check it out and decide for yourself.  ;D

No I didn't think that Photodisc sold photos for $300. I thought they mostly sold VCDs of RF photos for $450 each actually. Singles 10-13 MB $290.
« Last Edit: November 19, 2008, 16:47 by RacePhoto »

bittersweet

« Reply #22 on: November 19, 2008, 16:33 »
0
It's another Micro site


This is the part I don't get. Why do you call it a micro site? Large images are around $300.

These images are included in the main Getty royalty free search, where I for one spend about $3000 a month for a couple of "old school" clients who refuse to consider micro. I guess the confusion comes from the fact that you don't consider the royalty free side to be part of the "major Getty collection". When you go to Gettyimages.com and select your licensing prefs, royalty-free, rights managed, rights ready, etc, are all just listed there together under the images tab.

http://www.gettyimages.com/Creative/RoyaltyFree.aspx

Anyway, no need to argue about it. I'm not following your logic, but I guess it makes sense to you. Neither of our opinions changes the reality of the situation, which everyone is free to check out for themselves.  ;)

ETA:
You added to your post while I was posting...
From what I've read, there have been some sales that were significantly less money than expected, but were balanced out by other sales, and overall it is another revenue stream which is a good thing. I know several people who have just not bothered with it, and others who have seen good growth.

There are a few reports in the thread I linked to, but as azure suggested, there are others that you won't see.
« Last Edit: November 19, 2008, 16:42 by whatalife »

« Reply #23 on: November 19, 2008, 16:37 »
0
Hey, I forgot Alamy distributes Photodisc.  Check me out on Alamy : AAD09W :)

« Reply #24 on: November 19, 2008, 16:48 »
0
How about re-shooting difficult setups or unique but previously covered themes with a better (significantly higher quality) camera? Would these photos be acceptable to Getty even if the "test versions" are on IS already? Are pictures that get rejected by Getty automatically added to the IS submission queue?

Just being curious - and waiting for tomorrow.


« Reply #25 on: November 19, 2008, 16:51 »
0
Look, they just don't want similars on both places - same location, same model, same theme.  Different models in different stores, fine.  Same model in same store, likely bad.

No, rejects are not passed back to iStock anymore.

AVAVA

« Reply #26 on: November 19, 2008, 16:59 »
0
$ 339.99 is the top price for the large 50 mg. file from Photodisc, you get 20% of that sale or $67.99 for one large sale. I have Photodisc images that have made over $14,000 dollars in their life of 10 years and these images are still bringing in returns.

Best,
J

hali

« Reply #27 on: November 19, 2008, 17:13 »
0
There are a few forum threads (mostly about glitches or slowness in the process) but not a lot of detail. One diamond said he sold more via Getty than iStock with a much smaller portfolio, so I guess it can be lucrative. I wonder if it's mostly about bragging rights (I'm a Getty photographer)?

wow, this is like david and goliath, and it's all pretty relative, especially to us newbies.
if you big names feels small vs the Getty photographers,
how do you think we (the newbies with 100 images and still trying to figure out what you
all are talking about here)  feel reading this  (our tongues wagging) ha!Ha!...

AVAVA

« Reply #28 on: November 19, 2008, 17:42 »
0
Hey Hali,

 Never a reason to feel intimidated by others just embrace the knowledge you can every day. This is supposed to be a place to share ideas and information really about Micro but with Istock offering this cross over I think it's good for all here to get some information on the subject.
 Every photographer starts out with one image to in his or her collection just be happy with what you are achieving don't measure yourself against others unless it motivates you to learn more.

Best,
J

RacePhoto

« Reply #29 on: November 19, 2008, 17:42 »
0
$ 339.99 is the top price for the large 50 mg. file from Photodisc, you get 20% of that sale or $67.99 for one large sale. I have Photodisc images that have made over $14,000 dollars in their life of 10 years and these images are still bringing in returns.

Best,
J

Now I'm just jealous...  ;D

Good luck to all you Silvers, I hope you make lots of big sales.

hali

« Reply #30 on: November 19, 2008, 17:59 »
0
Hey Hali,

 Never a reason to feel intimidated by others just embrace the knowledge you can every day. This is supposed to be a place to share ideas and information really about Micro but with Istock offering this cross over I think it's good for all here to get some information on the subject.
 Every photographer starts out with one image to in his or her collection just be happy with what you are achieving don't measure yourself against others unless it motivates you to learn more.

Best,
J

hey thx AVAVA, that's really very encouraging. cheers, for UNINTIMIDATING me,
phew!  :)
« Last Edit: November 19, 2008, 18:02 by hali »

PaulieWalnuts

  • We Have Exciting News For You
« Reply #31 on: November 19, 2008, 18:06 »
0
Hey, I forgot Alamy distributes Photodisc.  Check me out on Alamy : AAD09W :)

Sean, have you sold anything through Alamy? And are the distributors the cause of the lower sales amounts?

Just turned Silver and ready-to-go with a D300   ;D

« Reply #32 on: November 19, 2008, 20:21 »
0
Hey, I forgot Alamy distributes Photodisc.  Check me out on Alamy : AAD09W :)
Sean, have you sold anything through Alamy? And are the distributors the cause of the lower sales amounts?

There are actually quite a few places (alamy included) that distribute Photodisc. They're all responsible for our tiny royalties from those sales. It stinks, but most of us have been lucky enough to balance those tiny royalties out with MUCH larger sales (primarily non-US).

« Reply #33 on: November 19, 2008, 20:37 »
0
Hey, I forgot Alamy distributes Photodisc.  Check me out on Alamy : AAD09W :)

Sean, have you sold anything through Alamy? And are the distributors the cause of the lower sales amounts?

Just turned Silver and ready-to-go with a D300   ;D

No way to know, as far as I can tell....

RacePhoto

« Reply #34 on: November 19, 2008, 20:50 »
0
Hey Hali,

 Never a reason to feel intimidated by others just embrace the knowledge you can every day. This is supposed to be a place to share ideas and information really about Micro but with Istock offering this cross over I think it's good for all here to get some information on the subject.
 Every photographer starts out with one image to in his or her collection just be happy with what you are achieving don't measure yourself against others unless it motivates you to learn more.

Best,
J

hey thx AVAVA, that's really very encouraging. cheers, for UNINTIMIDATING me,
phew!  :)

Yes, and me too.

Ancient Chinese Proverb time:

A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step."


bittersweet

« Reply #35 on: November 19, 2008, 21:37 »
0
The 20th came early... I just requested my contract!  8)

AVAVA

« Reply #36 on: November 19, 2008, 21:41 »
0
Good for you WL,

 If there are any questions you can always PM me. I might have an answer or at least the place to find it. One more rung up the ladder. Congrats!

Best,
AVAVA

« Reply #37 on: November 19, 2008, 21:50 »
0
The 20th came early... I just requested my contract!  8)

+1

bittersweet

« Reply #38 on: November 19, 2008, 21:51 »
0
Good for you WL,

 If there are any questions you can always PM me. I might have an answer or at least the place to find it. One more rung up the ladder. Congrats!

Best,
AVAVA

I think I have a few more hoops to jump through before they let me see behind the curtain, but thanks very much! :)

« Reply #39 on: November 20, 2008, 02:38 »
0
hi AVAVA,

Can you (or any one else with macro stock knowledge) may give us a tip on how one (without IS exclusiveness) can approach the macro market and try to go up the ladder?

Thanks a lot
Noam

« Reply #40 on: November 20, 2008, 06:25 »
0
Alamy takes applications just go to the website and sign up. Acclaim Images is a "mid stock".  Most of the macro won't talk to you if you have ever been on  a micro-stock. They feel that micro pricing degrades the value of the images. Digital Railroad was one such company and they are out of business. If you want to do your own marketing and negotiation you can look into Photoshelter Archive. They used to have a "stock" department called the Photoshelter Collection but it went under earlier this year.
« Last Edit: November 20, 2008, 18:16 by azurelaroux »

« Reply #41 on: November 20, 2008, 08:35 »
0
hi AVAVA,

Can you (or any one else with macro stock knowledge) may give us a tip on how one (without IS exclusiveness) can approach the macro market and try to go up the ladder?

Thanks a lot
Noam

Go to contributors.gettyimages.com and apply?

« Reply #42 on: November 20, 2008, 09:09 »
0


Go to contributors.gettyimages.com and apply?

Thanks you

the info on getty's page is interesting, so what's the big deal about IS invitation?

Most of the macro won't talk to you if you have ever been on  a micro-stock. They feel that micro pricing degrades the value of the images.

 if they accept IS exclusive contributor's micro stuff to their macro collections why not none exclusive's stuff?


noam

bittersweet

« Reply #43 on: November 20, 2008, 09:51 »
0

 if they accept IS exclusive contributor's micro stuff to their macro collections why not none exclusive's stuff?

They do not accept their "micro stuff". They have to be entirely different images. No similars are allowed. iStock is part of the Getty company. Why would they promote their competitors?
« Last Edit: November 20, 2008, 09:53 by whatalife »

AVAVA

« Reply #44 on: November 20, 2008, 13:16 »
0
Hi Noam,

 It is not very easy at the moment to get a Getty contract directly. Your work that you show will have to be head and shoulders above your normal efforts. You are especially under the microscope at the beginning so even more reason to show up with only your best images. I am a big believer of keep your portfolio tight and strong for any viewing, not one weak image allowed when presenting even if it means you are only showing 12 images.

  I personally see no point in putting work into a Macro collection that isn't stronger than your Micro. I have looked at some peoples work that have moved up from Micro to Photodisc through their association with Istock and for the most part I do not see a higher quality or a difference between the work they are uploading to the Macro part of their collections.

 I think some new Micro to Macro guys are looking at it like a test to see how sales go and are still putting better work up on their Micro sites that for them are proven returns. I look at it from an R&D standpoint. Research and development takes about 10% of my annual investments to test new markets and evolve my business. We research first what might sell well in a collection and then develop the content that seems most appropriate to the model we are testing.

 If you don't put the appropriate effort into the work you create for your research you will never get proper data back to understand if that model is a good match for you, wasted money. I would not bother putting mediocre work into a test, it will not return the proper results to help you analyze the potential of a new opportunity and eventually stifle your growth.

 It never hurts to give it a try Noam, if they reject you you can always try again later. I guarantee if you don't try you will never get in.

Keep on shooting everyone,
AVAVA

shank_ali

« Reply #45 on: November 20, 2008, 13:47 »
0
I have just read bruces post about this on the other forum.Reading 11 pages i get the impression istock contributors are rather excited about the prospect.When they qualify let hope the new exclusive silvers don't submit their holiday snaps or non stock images to Getty!
I think i should  get my silver cannister in about 18 months.In those 18 months i shall invest in a few nice lenses and perhaps a new camera.Onwards and upwards.

« Reply #46 on: November 20, 2008, 14:47 »
0
You'll only ever good things about IS in their forums. Problems are only talked about in non-public forums like Exclusive, Inspector and Getty forums. Like many of the other sites they have been known to delete or lock any threads/posts that express negativity or point out a flaw in the system.

« Reply #47 on: November 20, 2008, 15:15 »
0
Oh come on azure, you know that isn't true.  There is plenty of bitching and griping.

« Reply #48 on: November 20, 2008, 16:01 »
0
I know it is true. They've deleted my posts, even when the post isn't controversial.

« Reply #49 on: November 20, 2008, 16:05 »
0
I know it is true. They've deleted my posts, even when the post isn't controversial.

I've written some very forthright comments and never had any removed, and there are many, many others in the awkward squad that cannot be counted in the wooyay brigade.

bittersweet

« Reply #50 on: November 20, 2008, 16:30 »
0
I see plenty of negative being posted as well, and I have penned a few of my own which have never been removed, and for which I have never been "scolded".  I think when someone with a persecution complex continually posts misinformation to try to be a derisive force in the community, and those posts are based on the paranoid experiences of that one person rather than in fact, they tend to get removed.


shank_ali

« Reply #51 on: November 21, 2008, 02:14 »
0
I know it is true. They've deleted my posts, even when the post isn't controversial.
Thats nothing i have had plenty of replies removed and posts deleted.The forum admin's could not keep up most days until finally they removed the source  ::)

« Reply #52 on: November 21, 2008, 02:45 »
0
I know it is true. They've deleted my posts, even when the post isn't controversial.
Thats nothing i have had plenty of replies removed and posts deleted.The forum admin's could not keep up most days until finally they removed the source  ::)

I think that was done as a public service.
I'm sure the same behaviour from yourself here would have the same outcome.

« Reply #53 on: November 21, 2008, 03:49 »
0
You can hear quite often that budget RF brands like Gettys Photodisc are on a decline because a lot of customers in this segment have moved to microstock and the remaining buyers have become much more price sensitive.

Just wonder whether this offer is really beneficial for contributors or regular Getty contributors are no longer interested in submitting to the Photodisc collection and Getty needs new undemanding contributors to fill the gaps?

AVAVA

« Reply #54 on: November 21, 2008, 09:47 »
0
Gizeh,

 I can tell you from experience my Seattle editor at Getty will not place my work in Photodisc anymore at least not for the past 6 months. My last 600 uploads to Getty RF have gone into a lesser collection with a lower price point and far worse placement per page. called Stockbyte. I wish my work would be accepted at Photodisc but maybe they are making it an exclusive Istock collection. My Photodisc images are now buried in the search engine at Getty.

Hope this helps,
AVAVA

bittersweet

« Reply #55 on: November 21, 2008, 15:02 »
0
I got my invitation this morning and just signed the online agreement. Now I'm just waiting for the guy to arrive at my door who will be surgically attaching this crown to my head.  :D ;D :D

« Reply #56 on: November 21, 2008, 17:29 »
0
deleted, think it has already been answered :)
« Last Edit: November 22, 2008, 16:45 by clearviewstock »

jsnover

« Reply #57 on: November 22, 2008, 12:03 »
0
You'll only ever good things about IS in their forums. Problems are only talked about in non-public forums like Exclusive, Inspector and Getty forums. Like many of the other sites they have been known to delete or lock any threads/posts that express negativity or point out a flaw in the system.

That hasn't been my experience at all. I've posted negative things about iStock and its policies many times, in IS forums and I've never had one removed or been banned. I try to be constructive about the criticism though and stay away from flaming them or other posts. I once had a topic removed - and got a note from Rob that he'd done it - because I had mistakenly assumed Getty owned another stock site that they didn't (a guy who sold his business to Getty started another site and I got confused). I was fine with that.

I wouldn't know anything about the Inspector or Getty forums as I've never seen either of those. The exclusive forum is pretty quiet and generally follows the same patterns as the others - no ranting and raving there that I've seen (but I've only seen it since the end of August and haven't spent any time looking back at old stuff there).
« Last Edit: November 22, 2008, 12:13 by jsnover »

AVAVA

« Reply #58 on: November 22, 2008, 13:16 »
0
 Getty forums do not really exist. I belong to a Macro group but it is not part of the Getty company it is our own Listserv. The community thing is all because of you guys and Micro and you should work very hard to hold on to this effort. One of the things that attracted me to Micro was the community feel and all the support from other photographers. You won't find that in Macro.

Best,
AVAVA

lagereek

« Reply #59 on: November 23, 2008, 03:33 »
0
Getty forums do not really exist. I belong to a Macro group but it is not part of the Getty company it is our own Listserv. The community thing is all because of you guys and Micro and you should work very hard to hold on to this effort. One of the things that attracted me to Micro was the community feel and all the support from other photographers. You won't find that in Macro.

Best,
AVAVA


Amen!

« Reply #60 on: November 23, 2008, 06:57 »
0
Getty forums do not really exist. I belong to a Macro group but it is not part of the Getty company it is our own Listserv. The community thing is all because of you guys and Micro and you should work very hard to hold on to this effort. One of the things that attracted me to Micro was the community feel and all the support from other photographers. You won't find that in Macro.

Best,
AVAVA

Amen!

Don't you think this is the reason your traditional profits have dropped?  Communities of photographers encouraging each other to shoot and upload?

AVAVA

« Reply #61 on: November 23, 2008, 09:37 »
0
 No actually I don't. It is just the progression of the industry standards and the development of new models that lowered the price point to a new low. Many people were sharing info 5 years ago in Macro on our own listserv before Micro was hardly making a stir that is where we gained the strength and knowledge to start our own agencies as a team. It just makes us better equipped to adjust for change when we know what is going on at the big agencies. If it weren't for the Micro community and it's approach you may never of become a stock photographer. Not because you are not good enough it was just a much smaller door back then. You had to already be an established professional photographer to even apply.
 If you don't share data and info with each other you are at the hands of the agencies to be your only source of information. I find concern with that. It is nice to know when your sales plunge that you are not the only one or that you are the only one, the agencies won't tell you but sharing info amongst yourselves will. Strength in numbers their always has been. I'm not talking about rebellion or revolution or even a union just having some feedback about what is going on is helpful. Just my experience.

Best,
AVAVA
« Last Edit: November 23, 2008, 15:39 by AVAVA »

« Reply #62 on: November 25, 2008, 17:06 »
0
Bummer - we are being judged by our current portfolio - duds inclusive. As you can already tell I was rejected by the Getty editor gods. And I had so many neat ideas. I guess I have to give my best to IS just to get a chance at Getty. Anybody have an opinion towards trimming the duds from the portfolio?

AVAVA

« Reply #63 on: November 25, 2008, 17:52 »
0
Read,

 If you want to get into Getty or any other site for that matter. Take those great ideas turn them into 12 professional quality  images and take them with you back to Getty. Keep knocking till someone answers. Quite often timing is everything.

Best of luck,
AVAVA

PaulieWalnuts

  • We Have Exciting News For You
« Reply #64 on: November 25, 2008, 18:00 »
0
Bummer - we are being judged by our current portfolio - duds inclusive. As you can already tell I was rejected by the Getty editor gods. And I had so many neat ideas. I guess I have to give my best to IS just to get a chance at Getty. Anybody have an opinion towards trimming the duds from the portfolio?

Sorry to hear that. Did they reject your application request or did you submit an application and they rejected that?

bittersweet

« Reply #65 on: November 25, 2008, 20:30 »
0
I've heard from several people today who did not get in.  :-\ They did say you could try again in 90 days instead of waiting until you reach gold. From what I hear they don't give a lot of specific info in the "no thanks" notice either so it's hard to know what exactly to do to improve the chances next time.

When I see people whose portfolios I admire as being leagues beyond mine, I feel like my getting in was some kind of accident.

AVAVA

« Reply #66 on: November 25, 2008, 21:09 »
0
 The doors at Getty are constantly revolving like some fine hotel. Timing is very important. One week they are not taking anything and then all of a sudden everything changes. Keep knocking LOUD!

Best,
AVAVA

« Reply #67 on: November 25, 2008, 22:32 »
0
Bummer - we are being judged by our current portfolio - duds inclusive. As you can already tell I was rejected by the Getty editor gods. And I had so many neat ideas. I guess I have to give my best to IS just to get a chance at Getty. Anybody have an opinion towards trimming the duds from the portfolio?

Sorry to hear that. Did they reject your application request or did you submit an application and they rejected that?

I do not get the difference. I applied through the silver exclusive link and that came back negative. they give you an additional 90 days to try again.
thanks AVAVA for the encouragement.

shank_ali

« Reply #68 on: December 01, 2008, 03:02 »
0
When you reach gold as an exclusive i believe you can start uploading to  getty.With silvers it slightly different and although a few might get through on first applying others will need to reach 5000 sales before automatically qualifying .
It is a good ploy by istockphoto to try and attract more exclusives.
There is some fine new contributors on istock who hit the ground running and have instant success with regards to sales but if your like me and a few others in the races for bronze and silver we just sit tight and enjoy our small steady sales.

bittersweet

« Reply #69 on: December 01, 2008, 08:53 »
0
When you reach gold as an exclusive i believe you can start uploading to  getty.With silvers it slightly different and although a few might get through on first applying others will need to reach 5000 sales before automatically qualifying .

Yes, gold gets automatic approval, but from what I can tell, there is nothing automatic about the silver approval. I have friends who have over 7000 downloads and have not gotten in. It only makes sense that anyone who is reasonably expecting to reach 10,000 within 90 days should be approved (since that is the waiting period to reapply), but I don't have any data to back up that assumption.

Good luck to those still awaiting a verdict!

« Reply #70 on: December 01, 2008, 09:33 »
0
When you reach gold as an exclusive i believe you can start uploading to  getty.With silvers it slightly different and although a few might get through on first applying others will need to reach 5000 sales before automatically qualifying .

Yes, gold gets automatic approval, but from what I can tell, there is nothing automatic about the silver approval. I have friends who have over 7000 downloads and have not gotten in. It only makes sense that anyone who is reasonably expecting to reach 10,000 within 90 days should be approved (since that is the waiting period to reapply), but I don't have any data to back up that assumption.

Good luck to those still awaiting a verdict!

Probably a good guess on your part. Hopefully they ease off a bit after 90 days and rejecting the majority of silver applicants.


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
0 Replies
3201 Views
Last post September 16, 2009, 07:07
by NancyCWalker
26 Replies
14473 Views
Last post March 30, 2011, 12:27
by gostwyck
54 Replies
22800 Views
Last post April 07, 2011, 17:22
by cathyslife
21 Replies
7434 Views
Last post November 20, 2011, 08:13
by cobalt
2 Replies
3016 Views
Last post February 25, 2013, 10:29
by Pinocchio

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors