MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: SSS or Sales Sizes Statistics  (Read 4583 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

« on: July 03, 2010, 22:08 »
0
If you don't find this interesting please move along like someone says here at MSG :)

SUB (7) 4%
XS (65) 38%
S (38) 22%
M (25) 15%
L (35) 20%
EL (2) 1%

if you would like to share yours please feel free


« Reply #1 on: July 03, 2010, 23:36 »
0
I find it very interesting! Do you have an easy way to compile those stats or just counting them yourself?

Also, what period is covered?

« Reply #2 on: July 04, 2010, 07:25 »
0
I find it very interesting! Do you have an easy way to compile those stats or just counting them yourself?

Also, what period is covered?

It was quite fast because I have all my sales on a excel spreadsheet, the period is since the start at IS

« Reply #3 on: July 04, 2010, 07:53 »
0
Over the past 2 months for me:

XS 13%
S 17%
M 38%
L 27%
XL 3%
XXL 2%

« Reply #4 on: July 04, 2010, 08:11 »
0
I guess that I would have to count them one by one. That's too much work for me!

« Reply #5 on: July 04, 2010, 09:40 »
0
I guess that I would have to count them one by one. That's too much work for me!
LOL I understand make just a month

« Reply #6 on: July 04, 2010, 11:08 »
0
I guess that I would have to count them one by one. That's too much work for me!

So did Luis.  There's not another way, afaik.

« Reply #7 on: July 04, 2010, 13:51 »
0
just to let you know I have created this and also to other agencies, once I am seeing if it is worth getting a new camera with more megapixels :)

havent decided yet because just IS and FT would make a difference! IS 20%, FT 15%..

« Reply #8 on: July 05, 2010, 17:58 »
0
just to let you know I have created this and also to other agencies, once I am seeing if it is worth getting a new camera with more megapixels :)

havent decided yet because just IS and FT would make a difference! IS 20%, FT 15%..

I think microstock is one of the areas where extra megapixels are definitely important. I'd say 12MP is the minimum you should be going for at the moment. If you've got significant sales on IS, then larger still is preferable.

What you can't calculate is whether you're missing out on sales when buyers are specifically looking for bigger files.

RacePhoto

« Reply #9 on: July 05, 2010, 21:56 »
0
just to let you know I have created this and also to other agencies, once I am seeing if it is worth getting a new camera with more megapixels :)

havent decided yet because just IS and FT would make a difference! IS 20%, FT 15%..

I think microstock is one of the areas where extra megapixels are definitely important. I'd say 12MP is the minimum you should be going for at the moment. If you've got significant sales on IS, then larger still is preferable.

What you can't calculate is whether you're missing out on sales when buyers are specifically looking for bigger files.

You mean I've been downsizing everything because the buyers are paying such low prices and I should be selling full size for 50 cents?  ???

You are probably right, but do buyers really look at the size of the image or are we just getting a better price when they do download an XXL on IS? With the 38% being XS, I wonder how much a 12MP camera justifies itself? Personal view, but if someone has a good DSLR and wants to spend money to make better images, I'd say go for the prime lens that will still be in their bag years from now and still be a valuable tool.

« Reply #10 on: July 07, 2010, 13:14 »
0
it is worth I guess I need to make some bucks with my D60, if I sell it on 2011 it will worth 0!!! I have ordered a D90 :P was thinking of the 550d but after so many reading, forum and everything decide to stay as Nikon guy :)

cheers holgs hope you have enjoyed my country :)

vonkara

« Reply #11 on: July 07, 2010, 14:08 »
0
just to let you know I have created this and also to other agencies, once I am seeing if it is worth getting a new camera with more megapixels :)

havent decided yet because just IS and FT would make a difference! IS 20%, FT 15%..

. I'd say 12MP is the minimum you should be going for at the moment. If you've got significant sales on IS, then larger still is preferable.

What you can't calculate is whether you're missing out on sales when buyers are specifically looking for bigger files.

I agree, I have a D300 at 12.3mpx and I have been asked more and more this last year for higher resolution of my images. Even on those collage I am doing who are approximatively 18mpx... not enough. Add that I can't crop any images that I take, downsize or rotate a bad camera angle. I need badly a 5D markII


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
1 Replies
4285 Views
Last post February 20, 2008, 15:14
by fotografer
2 Replies
5210 Views
Last post May 31, 2008, 04:38
by fotografer
12 Replies
6714 Views
Last post March 23, 2009, 20:48
by epixx
3 Replies
2644 Views
Last post October 07, 2010, 21:14
by PaulieWalnuts
4 Replies
4071 Views
Last post February 02, 2014, 14:39
by Microstockr

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors