pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: Stats graphics not updating  (Read 37814 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

« Reply #200 on: November 22, 2013, 15:01 »
-2
Well, now it's very clear you work for iStock. Only their employees would be arrogant enough to put the onus of getting sales stats on their contributors and not on themselves. The site is poorly run, with continuous problems other sites either don't have or are capable of fixing very quickly. It's truly embarrassing, especially now that you're owned by a large corporation.

I think we all express our frustration here because we want the site to work properly and we want the company to do well. Because when iStock does well its contributors do well (sort of). But complaints about basic functionality are taken as personal insults and met with snarls of derision. With the tremendous percentage of commission iStock takes, it also expects its contributors to cough up their own earnings to get sales information? It can't fix a simple function that's been broken for weeks now?

It can't...or it won't? After all, iStock is capable of running a half price sale flawlessly while contributor stats languish.
It's a pragmatic solution, the site isn't working and you want to see stats in an easy to view way?  What's the best way to do it?  Complain and when that doesn't work complain some more or try to find a solution?  I chose to offer possible solutions.  Do people want to get stats or just complain that iStock isn't working?

And to answer your question bhr, 'Why?".  It might have something to do with being called a liar, a stooge, a shill, or arrogant when you offer help.  Or maybe people left to find a site where there were less emoticons in use?
« Last Edit: November 22, 2013, 15:09 by tickstock »


lisafx

« Reply #201 on: November 22, 2013, 15:10 »
+5
They are very obviously here to distract from Istock's problems.

That's completely unfair. Simply.

I post as myself. I'm not some kind of iStock groupie - as I posted on another thread I am much more into Alamy at the moment. And I have said a few times what a big fan I am of the work at Stocksy. I am into photography and love great work.

The constant childish group negativity and misinformation annoys me because it is not helpful. It's the same inevitable negativity which plagued the old Yahoo Group. Long before any of the changes at iStock.

Then why are you here? 

ETA:  I am not encouraging you to leave, BTW.  I don't have a problem with people posting stuff I disagree with.  However if I disagree with it, I'm going to say so.   You may not be a shill.  However it is an increasingly common phenomenon online in industry forums for companies to have their employees monitor and shout down members who post negatively about the company.  Some guys at Fox admitted to having dozens of identities and trolling the web to attack anyone who posted negatively about Fox. 

The amount of time you and Tickstock spend in this forum pouring water on every single negative comment about Istock is suspect.  Anyone who had another job simply wouldn't have the time for it. 

It also seems you guys work as a tag-team.  That's not a personal insult, BTW, but an observation.  He gets fed up, and then suddenly there you are to take over. 

« Last Edit: November 22, 2013, 15:18 by lisafx »

Shelma1

  • stockcoalition.org
« Reply #202 on: November 22, 2013, 15:15 »
+7
Well, now it's very clear you work for iStock. Only their employees would be arrogant enough to put the onus of getting sales stats on their contributors and not on themselves. The site is poorly run, with continuous problems other sites either don't have or are capable of fixing very quickly. It's truly embarrassing, especially now that you're owned by a large corporation.

I think we all express our frustration here because we want the site to work properly and we want the company to do well. Because when iStock does well its contributors do well (sort of). But complaints about basic functionality are taken as personal insults and met with snarls of derision. With the tremendous percentage of commission iStock takes, it also expects its contributors to cough up their own earnings to get sales information? It can't fix a simple function that's been broken for weeks now?

It can't...or it won't? After all, iStock is capable of running a half price sale flawlessly while contributor stats languish.
It's a pragmatic solution, the site isn't working and you want to see stats in an easy to view way?  What's the best way to do it?  Complain and when that doesn't work complain some more or try to find a solution?  I chose to offer possible solutions.  Do people want to get stats or just complain that iStock isn't working?

And to answer your question bhr, 'Why?".  It might have something to do with being called a liar, a stooge, a shill, or arrogant when you offer help.  Or maybe people left to find a site where there were less emoticons in use?

Asking contributors to spend more than a hundred dollars a year to get access to stats that should be provided as a matter of course by their representative is not pragmatic. It's ludicrous. Especially when, I'm sure, many of your contributors don't earn that much at iStock in a year.

« Reply #203 on: November 22, 2013, 15:19 »
0
Well, now it's very clear you work for iStock. Only their employees would be arrogant enough to put the onus of getting sales stats on their contributors and not on themselves. The site is poorly run, with continuous problems other sites either don't have or are capable of fixing very quickly. It's truly embarrassing, especially now that you're owned by a large corporation.

I think we all express our frustration here because we want the site to work properly and we want the company to do well. Because when iStock does well its contributors do well (sort of). But complaints about basic functionality are taken as personal insults and met with snarls of derision. With the tremendous percentage of commission iStock takes, it also expects its contributors to cough up their own earnings to get sales information? It can't fix a simple function that's been broken for weeks now?

It can't...or it won't? After all, iStock is capable of running a half price sale flawlessly while contributor stats languish.
It's a pragmatic solution, the site isn't working and you want to see stats in an easy to view way?  What's the best way to do it?  Complain and when that doesn't work complain some more or try to find a solution?  I chose to offer possible solutions.  Do people want to get stats or just complain that iStock isn't working?

And to answer your question bhr, 'Why?".  It might have something to do with being called a liar, a stooge, a shill, or arrogant when you offer help.  Or maybe people left to find a site where there were less emoticons in use?

Asking contributors to spend more than a hundred dollars a year to get access to stats that should be provided as a matter of course by their representative is not pragmatic. It's ludicrous. Especially when, I'm sure, many of your contributors don't earn that much at iStock in a year.
You're misunderstanding me then.  I'm not asking you to do anything.  I'm telling you there are ways to see your stats if you really want to.  One way is to spend some money.  Another is to spend some time.  Other than that I don't think there is a good solution.  If you just want your totals you can add up all the money you've cased out since the stats broke and add it to your current balance.  The raw data is all correct so going through your sales on the 'my uploads' page will get you all the info too.

« Reply #204 on: November 22, 2013, 15:23 »
+6
Do people want to get stats or just complain that iStock isn't working?
My interpretation would be that people want stats but they balance the desire for stats against the cost in terms of effort of getting them. The methods you outlined did not meet the cost/benefit requirement.
Obviously the fact iStock charges contributors heavily for doing business also enters the equation.

« Reply #205 on: November 22, 2013, 15:28 »
-2
Do people want to get stats or just complain that iStock isn't working?
My interpretation would be that people want stats but they balance the desire for stats against the cost in terms of effort of getting them. The methods you outlined did not meet the cost/benefit requirement.
Obviously the fact iStock charges contributors heavily for doing business also enters the equation.
I understand, next time I'll hold back on offering solutions.  They seem unwanted that's for sure.

« Reply #206 on: November 22, 2013, 15:29 »
0
Then why are you here? 

ETA:  I am not encouraging you to leave, BTW.  I don't have a problem with people posting stuff I disagree with.  However if I disagree with it, I'm going to say so.   You may not be a shill.  However it is an increasingly common phenomenon online in industry forums for companies to have their employees monitor and shout down members who post negatively about the company.  Some guys at Fox admitted to having dozens of identities and trolling the web to attack anyone who posted negatively about Fox. 

The amount of time you and Tickstock spend in this forum pouring water on every single negative comment about Istock is suspect.  Anyone who had another job simply wouldn't have the time for it. 

It also seems you guys work as a tag-team.  That's not a personal insult, BTW, but an observation.  He gets fed up, and then suddenly there you are to take over.

I don't know where to begin with this utterly silly nonsense. You are finding stuff which simply is not there and drawing bogus, weird and almost nasty conclusions.

On the one hand you are saying that you are happy to listen to other points of view - but the result of me posting opinion which contradicts your own is that you accuse me of being a shill.

The tag-team thing is especially mad.

« Reply #207 on: November 22, 2013, 15:30 »
+3
[@TS] No, no! Just provide solutions that are more cost/benefit favourable and aren't trivially obvious.

Shelma1

  • stockcoalition.org
« Reply #208 on: November 22, 2013, 15:31 »
+6
Well, now it's very clear you work for iStock. Only their employees would be arrogant enough to put the onus of getting sales stats on their contributors and not on themselves. The site is poorly run, with continuous problems other sites either don't have or are capable of fixing very quickly. It's truly embarrassing, especially now that you're owned by a large corporation.

I think we all express our frustration here because we want the site to work properly and we want the company to do well. Because when iStock does well its contributors do well (sort of). But complaints about basic functionality are taken as personal insults and met with snarls of derision. With the tremendous percentage of commission iStock takes, it also expects its contributors to cough up their own earnings to get sales information? It can't fix a simple function that's been broken for weeks now?

It can't...or it won't? After all, iStock is capable of running a half price sale flawlessly while contributor stats languish.
It's a pragmatic solution, the site isn't working and you want to see stats in an easy to view way?  What's the best way to do it?  Complain and when that doesn't work complain some more or try to find a solution?  I chose to offer possible solutions.  Do people want to get stats or just complain that iStock isn't working?

And to answer your question bhr, 'Why?".  It might have something to do with being called a liar, a stooge, a shill, or arrogant when you offer help.  Or maybe people left to find a site where there were less emoticons in use?

Asking contributors to spend more than a hundred dollars a year to get access to stats that should be provided as a matter of course by their representative is not pragmatic. It's ludicrous. Especially when, I'm sure, many of your contributors don't earn that much at iStock in a year.
You're misunderstanding me then.  I'm not asking you to do anything.  I'm telling you there are ways to see your stats if you really want to.  One way is to spend some money.  Another is to spend some time.  Other than that I don't think there is a good solution.  If you just want your totals you can add up all the money you've cased out since the stats broke and add it to your current balance.  The raw data is all correct so going through your sales on the 'my uploads' page will get you all the info too.

The good solution is for iStock to FIX THE WEBSITE. The good solution is NOT for contributors to spend more time or more money figuring out stats every other website is perfectly capable of providing. Contributors should spend their time and money creating content.

All iStock's arrogance does is drive contributors away. I'm a perfect example. I'm a creative director; illustration is a hobby for me. I never would have even noticed there were other stock sites, really, if iStock hadn't aggravated me so much. (I was aware of Getty and Corbis, of course, and Veer; all the art directors I work with use them). It was only after getting completely fed up with iStock that I started poking around and discovered Shutterstock. I uploaded my work and immediately started earning 4X as much there. Until then my goal was to get enough sales at iStock to hopefully one day go exclusive. iStock immediately became the site I uploaded to much less often.


« Reply #209 on: November 22, 2013, 15:34 »
-5
No, no! Just provide solutions that are more cost/benefit favourable and aren't trivially obvious.
I didn't realize those were trivially obvious.  I only learned about stockperformer working for this from hearing other people talk about it on the istock forum a few days ago.  The stats going out seems to be causing a lot of distress for some people and $140/year is not much for many of us who make a living from stock.   

« Reply #210 on: November 22, 2013, 15:38 »
0
The good solution is for iStock to FIX THE WEBSITE. The good solution is NOT for contributors to spend more time or more money figuring out stats every other website is perfectly capable of providing. Contributors should spend their time and money creating content.
Obviously it would be better if the website worked, this thread exists because it's not working.  You can hope and wish it was working but that won't get you any closer to seeing the stats.  Sorry to say, it seems you'll just have to wait then.

lisafx

« Reply #211 on: November 22, 2013, 15:53 »
+3
Then why are you here? 

ETA:  I am not encouraging you to leave, BTW.  I don't have a problem with people posting stuff I disagree with.  However if I disagree with it, I'm going to say so.   You may not be a shill.  However it is an increasingly common phenomenon online in industry forums for companies to have their employees monitor and shout down members who post negatively about the company.  Some guys at Fox admitted to having dozens of identities and trolling the web to attack anyone who posted negatively about Fox. 

The amount of time you and Tickstock spend in this forum pouring water on every single negative comment about Istock is suspect.  Anyone who had another job simply wouldn't have the time for it. 

It also seems you guys work as a tag-team.  That's not a personal insult, BTW, but an observation.  He gets fed up, and then suddenly there you are to take over.

I don't know where to begin with this utterly silly nonsense. You are finding stuff which simply is not there and drawing bogus, weird and almost nasty conclusions.

On the one hand you are saying that you are happy to listen to other points of view - but the result of me posting opinion which contradicts your own is that you accuse me of being a shill.

The tag-team thing is especially mad.

Well, you're certainly entitled to your opinion, as I said.  But I have provided enough evidence to support my conclusions.  Whether you and/or Tickstock are, in fact Getty employees, I have no way of knowing, but your behavior certainly suggests it to a large enough degree to make it a reasonable hypothesis. 

FWIW, calling people or their opinions "mad", "bogus", "silly", "weird", "nasty, and/or "bitter", is not in any way proof to the contrary.  In fact, it is generally a tactic employed by those who have no rational counter argument. 

PS - Nobody pays me to be here arguing with you.  I actually do have a real job, which I should get back to so I'm going to have to let that be my last word on the subject for the time being :)
« Last Edit: November 22, 2013, 16:07 by lisafx »

mlwinphoto

« Reply #212 on: November 22, 2013, 16:05 »
+2
Why don't you just quit responding altogether?

 ;)
I've been thinking that might be a good idea.  You even got a +1 from me.

What, and give up that added income you must be getting from iStock for defending them in these forums? 
I appreciate that you, on occasion, have tried to be helpful.  But, you also need to accept the fact that some/many of us are tired of the problems iStock has (look at the bug list) and are perfectly content to throw our support elsewhere....even places that have graphs and world maps; and certain start ups.
« Last Edit: November 22, 2013, 16:47 by mlwinphoto »

« Reply #213 on: November 22, 2013, 16:05 »
0
Well, you're certainly entitled to your opinion, as I said.  But I have provided enough evidence to support my conclusions.  Whether you and/or Tickstock are, in fact shills, I have no way of knowing, but your behavior certainly suggests it to a large enough degree to make it a reasonable hypothesis. 

FWIW, calling people or their opinions "mad", "bogus", "weird", "nasty, and/or "bitter", is not in any way proof to the contrary.  In fact, it is generally a tactic employed by those who have no rational counter argument.

Oh for goodness sake! All of this stupid because I have opinions which differ from your own. And opinions which I feel I have expressed in a civil and I hope reasonably intelligent manner.

Obviously I cannot provide a counter argument because how can I defend myself against this random accusation that I am a shill ? Which is why I said that I did not know where to begin.

Basically - if I disagree with you then you call me a shill. So anyone who expresses a positive opinion about iStock is potentially a shill - especially if they are regularly positive. Or in my case just not utterly negative - because anything less than completely negative seems to pass for positive here currently.

It's * insulting.

« Reply #214 on: November 22, 2013, 16:14 »
-4
Why don't you just quit responding altogether?

 ;)
I've been thinking that might be a good idea.  You even got a +1 from me.

What, and give up that added income you must be getting from iStock for defending them in these forums? 
I appreciate that you, on occasion, have tried to be helpful.  But, you also need to accept the fact that some/many of us are tired of the problems iStock has (look at the bug list) and are perfectly content to throw our support elsewhere....even places that have graphs and world maps.
Don't buy into that nutty conspiracy theory.  I'm not defending iStock, they should fix the website.  I have no control over that but what I do have control over is how I react to the problems.  Like I said you can complain about not seeing your stats and end up no closer than when you started or you can try to figure out a solution. 

mlwinphoto

« Reply #215 on: November 22, 2013, 16:18 »
+2
Why don't you just quit responding altogether?

 ;)
I've been thinking that might be a good idea.  You even got a +1 from me.

What, and give up that added income you must be getting from iStock for defending them in these forums? 
I appreciate that you, on occasion, have tried to be helpful.  But, you also need to accept the fact that some/many of us are tired of the problems iStock has (look at the bug list) and are perfectly content to throw our support elsewhere....even places that have graphs and world maps.
Like I said you can complain about not seeing your stats and end up no closer than when you started or you can try to figure out a solution.

With all the recent changes I no longer make enough sales to worry about my stats.   ;)  :'(

« Reply #216 on: November 22, 2013, 16:20 »
0
Why don't you just quit responding altogether?

 ;)
I've been thinking that might be a good idea.  You even got a +1 from me.

What, and give up that added income you must be getting from iStock for defending them in these forums? 
I appreciate that you, on occasion, have tried to be helpful.  But, you also need to accept the fact that some/many of us are tired of the problems iStock has (look at the bug list) and are perfectly content to throw our support elsewhere....even places that have graphs and world maps.
Like I said you can complain about not seeing your stats and end up no closer than when you started or you can try to figure out a solution.

With all the recent changes I no longer make enough sales to worry about my stats.   ;)  :'(
Then I hope your other sites are making up the difference.

« Reply #217 on: November 22, 2013, 16:21 »
+1
Strange as it may seem, I've found a way of checking my stats that's quicker than using IS.
I keep a running total of my cashouts for the month in excel, which I use constantly so it's no big deal, add the current earnings balance, and deduct the amount paid out for the PP. Done!
It's quicker than trying to get through to the stats page, which is ridiculously slow. If the site speed doesn't improve, I'll probably keep doing this if and when they fix the stats.

mlwinphoto

« Reply #218 on: November 22, 2013, 16:35 »
0
Why don't you just quit responding altogether?

 ;)
I've been thinking that might be a good idea.  You even got a +1 from me.

What, and give up that added income you must be getting from iStock for defending them in these forums? 
I appreciate that you, on occasion, have tried to be helpful.  But, you also need to accept the fact that some/many of us are tired of the problems iStock has (look at the bug list) and are perfectly content to throw our support elsewhere....even places that have graphs and world maps.
Like I said you can complain about not seeing your stats and end up no closer than when you started or you can try to figure out a solution.

With all the recent changes I no longer make enough sales to worry about my stats.   ;)  :'(
Then I hope your other sites are making up the difference.

And then some.

« Reply #219 on: November 22, 2013, 16:38 »
0
Good deal. 

« Reply #220 on: November 22, 2013, 17:40 »
+3
Ok.. perhaps this topic has been hashed on enough.  If someone new comes up, feel free to start a new topic. 


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
8 Replies
4304 Views
Last post October 07, 2010, 11:13
by OM
10 Replies
5147 Views
Last post July 06, 2011, 03:37
by BaldricksTrousers
39 Replies
12245 Views
Last post September 25, 2012, 19:24
by lisafx
5 Replies
5045 Views
Last post June 11, 2015, 06:46
by Sean Locke Photography
6 Replies
4566 Views
Last post January 17, 2020, 13:07
by Stu49

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors