MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: Feb Getty Bump  (Read 4700 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

« on: March 26, 2013, 08:57 »
+1
I don't get it. I just got my Getty bump for Feb and I had many sales where I was paid $1 to $2 in earnings only. How can this be? These are E+ files that on iStock even at an XS sized sale will earn quite a bit more than that. I realize on Getty we only get 20%, but the prices are much higher to start with for RF on Getty than IStock. This makes no mathematical sense. This means some of our E+ files are selling on Getty for $5 if $1 is 20% of the sale price. Can this be true? Are we getting hood winked here?
« Last Edit: March 26, 2013, 09:24 by iStop »


B8

« Reply #1 on: March 26, 2013, 09:02 »
0
I just checked and the lowest price for the smallest sized E+ file on Getty is around US$10 and about US$20 for the smallest Vetta file. Something does sound wrong here.

« Reply #2 on: March 26, 2013, 09:05 »
+4
No, this is correct. Getty often sells at much lower price points than istock.

Which is why so many people are scared of getty360 if more customers are moving to getty, away from istock.

The prices on the Getty website are just a list price, what customers actually pay is completly different. You will get a few 60 or 80 dollar results also though, but you might find that the average royalty on getty is far below your average royalty for e+ or vetta/agency on istock.

There migh also be variations with portfolio style, maybe some people are lucky and always get extremly high payouts. I saw one lady claim her average royalty from getty is 80 dollars. But I have never heard anyone else say that. It seems to be something around 10-16 dollars for the people I spoke with. But they all had many tiny amounts inbetween.

« Reply #3 on: March 26, 2013, 09:39 »
+3
And the smoke and mirrors of Getty math and screwing over of photographers continues...

« Reply #4 on: March 26, 2013, 09:40 »
+3
And the smoke and mirrors of Getty math and screwing over of photographers continues...

I'm shocked, I tell you!

As Cobalt said, any wonder why Getty360 will not actually be selling at high premium prices?

« Reply #5 on: March 26, 2013, 11:01 »
+1
Even if Getty doesn't sell at list prices to buyers, it means they are selling at half of list price in order for me to have E+ sales on Getty that are earning $1. That doesn't sound right. There is still something fishy here unless there are some Getty partners reselling Getty content and getting 50% of the pie. But my understanding was/is that E+ content selling on Getty is only being sold directly to Getty buyers and not part of some partner deal. Getting a $1 from a Getty sale is hardly worth it and no better than putting your stuff into the PP program on iStock.
« Last Edit: March 26, 2013, 11:18 by iStop »

« Reply #6 on: March 26, 2013, 11:20 »
0
FWIW, I have had GI sales in the range of a couple of dollars, but I also had others in the equivalent of ELs.

« Reply #7 on: March 27, 2013, 00:54 »
0
Intresting to see, reading the forums, that a lot of people are happy with the Getty sales and they are pushing more and more images to E+. Yes, the Getty sales will increase, but what is going to happen to the iStock sales? I bet they will go down more and more. At the end, iStock will be just another Getty collection.

JFP

« Reply #8 on: March 27, 2013, 02:32 »
+1
BME for GI sales, BME for GI Refunds, but still enough to compensate the huge drop of IS sales...

B8

« Reply #9 on: March 27, 2013, 02:55 »
+1
iStock is already becoming a Getty collection. Getty 360 will put the entire iStock site onto the Getty site. Done deal. Initially only open to exclusive Getty clients, eventually it will be open to all Getty clients is the prediction consensus.
« Last Edit: March 27, 2013, 10:55 by B8 »

« Reply #10 on: March 27, 2013, 10:30 »
0
Hi guys,

what is this getty sales in istock?

is it only available for exclusive contributor?


« Reply #11 on: March 27, 2013, 11:17 »
0
Hi guys,

what is this getty sales in istock?

is it only available for exclusive contributor?

Yes, exclusive content is added the Getty Images site (still labeled iStock content), but at different price points since Getty Images caters to a different client and offers different usage rights, so Getty sales can often be higher than iStock sales.

« Reply #12 on: March 27, 2013, 11:25 »
0
.
« Last Edit: May 12, 2014, 15:00 by Audi 5000 »

« Reply #13 on: March 27, 2013, 12:32 »
+2
FWIW, I have had GI sales in the range of a couple of dollars, but I also had others in the equivalent of ELs.
It's not all one dollar sales, I had a few $100+ and a lot of $ 50+ ones.  The overall RPD is higher from Getty by 2x than IStock at about $20.

That was exactly what I said.

I have mixed feelings about GI sales. The extra money is good, however, it is highly likely a part of Getty's plot to pay all exclusives 20%.

wds

« Reply #14 on: March 27, 2013, 22:13 »
+2
Intresting to see, reading the forums, that a lot of people are happy with the Getty sales and they are pushing more and more images to E+. Yes, the Getty sales will increase, but what is going to happen to the iStock sales? I bet they will go down more and more. At the end, iStock will be just another Getty collection.

Yes, i fear you may ultimately be correct.  :(

« Reply #15 on: March 28, 2013, 00:52 »
0
FWIW, I have had GI sales in the range of a couple of dollars, but I also had others in the equivalent of ELs.
It's not all one dollar sales, I had a few $100+ and a lot of $ 50+ ones.  The overall RPD is higher from Getty by 2x than IStock at about $20.

Congratulations that your RPD is double that of istock. I was with getty for 4 years and I was never that lucky. I do wonder, if your results are so good, why dont you upload to getty only? If you are such a successful shooter they will certainly give you a place in their house program and then you can also send images to their RM program. That is definetly a real advantage because they probably have the biggest RM program of anyone on the market.

For me it was obvious that I was getting more for sales on istock. So I stopped uploading to Getty 18 months ago. But maybe my style just wasnt the right one for them.

wds

« Reply #16 on: March 28, 2013, 16:19 »
+1
FWIW, I have had GI sales in the range of a couple of dollars, but I also had others in the equivalent of ELs.
It's not all one dollar sales, I had a few $100+ and a lot of $ 50+ ones.  The overall RPD is higher from Getty by 2x than IStock at about $20.

Congratulations that your RPD is double that of istock. I was with getty for 4 years and I was never that lucky. I do wonder, if your results are so good, why dont you upload to getty only? If you are such a successful shooter they will certainly give you a place in their house program and then you can also send images to their RM program. That is definetly a real advantage because they probably have the biggest RM program of anyone on the market.

For me it was obvious that I was getting more for sales on istock. So I stopped uploading to Getty 18 months ago. But maybe my style just wasnt the right one for them.

When I was uploading to Getty directly a few years ago, the RPI and RPD exceeded my iStock collection. However, when Getty started going overboard with the editing, I pretty much stopped uploading directly there. Getty/E+ RPI seems lower than what I got a few years ago uploading directly.


 

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors