MicrostockGroup

Agency Based Discussion => iStockPhoto.com => Topic started by: leaf on July 29, 2011, 16:01

Title: TAC: The agency collection - how is it doing?
Post by: leaf on July 29, 2011, 16:01
For those who have images in TAC (The Agency Collection) through one of the many image partners.. how are the sales?  Is it worthwhile, or do you find your general microtock RPI just as high?
Title: Re: TAC: The agency collection - how is it doing?
Post by: Slovenian on July 30, 2011, 09:54
I guess you got your answer. Silence says it all ;)
Title: Re: TAC: The agency collection - how is it doing?
Post by: leaf on July 30, 2011, 10:52
haha, yeah maybe..

I think the main reason for the silence is because very few people here are submitting to traditional 'macro' agencies that are partnered with The Agency Collection.  The only one that comes to mind is Jonathan Ross, I was hoping to find others as well.
Title: Re: TAC: The agency collection - how is it doing?
Post by: Slovenian on July 30, 2011, 11:27
Wait a minute am I missing something? As far as I know every exclusive can have AC files, it's just they they're picked by IS, not nominated by contribs.
Title: Re: TAC: The agency collection - how is it doing?
Post by: Sean Locke Photography on July 30, 2011, 12:55
No, you can nominate files.
Title: Re: TAC: The agency collection - how is it doing?
Post by: Slovenian on July 30, 2011, 12:59
No, you can nominate files.

OK, but still not only macro stockers contribute to the AC, so there must be quite a few. I know you have a lot of AC stuff
Title: Re: TAC: The agency collection - how is it doing?
Post by: leaf on July 30, 2011, 13:19
No, you can nominate files.

OK, but still not only macro stockers contribute to the AC, so there must be quite a few. I know you have a lot of AC stuff

Hm, yeah I guess you're right.  I had forgotten about the exclusives nominating their files.  I guess I was mostly curious about non-exclusives who have put their images in TAC through the back door (macro agencies).... although exclusives who have TAC images should have a similar performance I would guess.