MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: TS earnings are being posted  (Read 4839 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

microstockphoto.co.uk

« on: June 23, 2010, 02:04 »
0
Thinkstock earnings are being posted now on Istock, and I can see them growing in "real time" right now.

Funny they are being added a few at a time since sales happened last month


« Reply #1 on: June 23, 2010, 04:03 »
0
Thinkstock earnings are being posted now on Istock, and I can see them growing in "real time" right now.

Funny they are being added a few at a time since sales happened last month

Yep added for me too - looks like there has been significant growth there in the last month. What do you mean by you cen see them growing "real time"?

microstockphoto.co.uk

« Reply #2 on: June 23, 2010, 04:33 »
0
Thinkstock earnings are being posted now on Istock, and I can see them growing in "real time" right now.

Funny they are being added a few at a time since sales happened last month

Yep added for me too - looks like there has been significant growth there in the last month. What do you mean by you cen see them growing "real time"?

I mean that when I cheched first time this morning at 7 o' clock (GMT) there were only a few dollars and I was a bit disappointed. Then I checked again and again and one hour later the total amount finally stabilised - and it's pretty good indeed.

I respect those who chose not to join the partner programme since $.25 is too low, each of us must draw a line and $.25 is the limit for me as well. But I joined and I'm not missing StockXpert at all: the amount earned now through the IS+TS partnership is almost the same, even if I have much less pictures now on TS.

I also noted that a lot of pictures which were not selling much on IS (such as simple backgrounds and textures) are having a second chance now on TS. I may sound a bit optimistic but credits and subs are possibly complementary and not competing completely.

« Reply #3 on: June 23, 2010, 05:56 »
0
thanks for the heads up - and I thought I was just have a good day at iStock :)

« Reply #4 on: June 23, 2010, 10:25 »
0
But what is with StockXpert sales at TS (hemera)...?

I have there 200 old photos to test TS, still nothing, but they are on TS for more than month...?

« Reply #5 on: June 23, 2010, 10:34 »
0
StockXpert earnings on TS are posted on a different schedule.  I had my first Hemera sales posted to StockXpert on June 8th and expect to see the next earnings in two weeks or so.

« Reply #6 on: June 23, 2010, 11:37 »
0
StockXpert earnings on TS are posted on a different schedule.  I had my first Hemera sales posted to StockXpert on June 8th and expect to see the next earnings in two weeks or so.

Thanks!

« Reply #7 on: June 23, 2010, 20:36 »
0

I mean that when I cheched first time this morning at 7 o' clock (GMT) there were only a few dollars and I was a bit disappointed. Then I checked again and again and one hour later the total amount finally stabilised - and it's pretty good indeed.

I did the same thing!  Mine was only at $1.00 the first time I looked, I was relieved to see that number grow overnight.  I offer all of my photos in the partner program & am loving the extra cash without the extra effort.

« Reply #8 on: June 23, 2010, 21:05 »
0

I mean that when I cheched first time this morning at 7 o' clock (GMT) there were only a few dollars and I was a bit disappointed. Then I checked again and again and one hour later the total amount finally stabilised - and it's pretty good indeed.

I respect those who chose not to join the partner programme since $.25 is too low, each of us must draw a line and $.25 is the limit for me as well. But I joined and I'm not missing StockXpert at all: the amount earned now through the IS+TS partnership is almost the same, even if I have much less pictures now on TS.

I also noted that a lot of pictures which were not selling much on IS (such as simple backgrounds and textures) are having a second chance now on TS. I may sound a bit optimistic but credits and subs are possibly complementary and not competing completely.

Maybe that is why your IS earnings are down...

« Reply #9 on: June 23, 2010, 21:47 »
0
Dont understand where to look on iStock site to see this???
What ThingStoka has with original iStock???
As I understand stuff from ex StockXpert are on Thing.
Aaa I dig it out I manually disabling 2 year images from iStock for prostitution on Thing, so I dont have images thru iStock on ThingStoka  ;D
Mamu im jbm anyhow
puke

microstockphoto.co.uk

« Reply #10 on: June 24, 2010, 01:13 »
0

I mean that when I cheched first time this morning at 7 o' clock (GMT) there were only a few dollars and I was a bit disappointed. Then I checked again and again and one hour later the total amount finally stabilised - and it's pretty good indeed.

I respect those who chose not to join the partner programme since $.25 is too low, each of us must draw a line and $.25 is the limit for me as well. But I joined and I'm not missing StockXpert at all: the amount earned now through the IS+TS partnership is almost the same, even if I have much less pictures now on TS.

I also noted that a lot of pictures which were not selling much on IS (such as simple backgrounds and textures) are having a second chance now on TS. I may sound a bit optimistic but credits and subs are possibly complementary and not competing completely.

Maybe that is why your IS earnings are down...

Maybe... but I didn't say my IS earnings are down. Indeed, they are (slowly) growing each month.

What I meant is that some admittedly not so great pictures of mine such as simple background - which stayed on IS for 2 years without sales - are now selling on TS.

« Reply #11 on: June 24, 2010, 05:49 »
0
can anyone help to explain the difference of buying a same images that from istock and through partner program thinkstock?

I have a few files in old stockxpert account, and all are simple vectors that i let it run on thinkstock now.

I have a few files in istock and is available through partner program and got some $0.25 sales. But my common sense told me that i should not activate all my files in istock to partner program, because if every images in istock is available in thinkstock, why still buyers will buy from istock?

I don't get it, unless there is different license usage of buying in istock and thinkstock.

I remember istock advise to activate those images that haven't been sold for 2 years or something, so does it mean they don't encourage everyone to make every files available in thinkstock?

quite a strange strategy, i understand shutterstock got subs download and there are on demands and EL for some usage..but i don't understand what istock wants contributor to do.

microstockphoto.co.uk

« Reply #12 on: June 24, 2010, 06:10 »
0
I think it's the old SUBS vs CREDITS issue... subs cost much less, but buyers must pay in advance and possibly will not use all available downloads; credits cost more but buyers pay as they go; subs appeal to large companies, credits to occasional buyers

not so weird to me

why they don't encourage to opt in all pictures, I don't know; maybe they believe it's better to sell some pictures only at higher price through IS - that makes sense for high quality pictures
« Last Edit: June 24, 2010, 06:13 by microstockphoto.co.uk »

« Reply #13 on: June 24, 2010, 08:20 »
0
Dont understand where to look on iStock site to see this???
What ThingStoka has with original iStock???
As I understand stuff from ex StockXpert are on Thing.
Aaa I dig it out I manually disabling 2 year images from iStock for prostitution on Thing, so I dont have images thru iStock on ThingStoka  ;D
Mamu im jbm anyhow
puke

I don't understand what is your question, maybe this will help

Look at: "Stats" for general amount or "My uploads" and go to "Partner program".

« Reply #14 on: June 24, 2010, 08:51 »
0
I think it's the old SUBS vs CREDITS issue... subs cost much less, but buyers must pay in advance and possibly will not use all available downloads; credits cost more but buyers pay as they go; subs appeal to large companies, credits to occasional buyers

not so weird to me

why they don't encourage to opt in all pictures, I don't know; maybe they believe it's better to sell some pictures only at higher price through IS - that makes sense for high quality pictures

but it is weird that same file got different price that sold through a same agency..

« Reply #15 on: June 24, 2010, 08:54 »
0
but it is weird that same file got different price that sold through a same agency..

Yes, it has all become so convoluted it's tough to tell what we are really getting paid. But then that's a good thing for the agencies!


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
467 Replies
122337 Views
Last post May 25, 2011, 13:01
by Karimala
19 Replies
11252 Views
Last post March 03, 2011, 03:30
by RacePhoto
39 Replies
25088 Views
Last post July 12, 2012, 21:04
by luissantos84
31 Replies
6770 Views
Last post February 25, 2022, 12:07
by NikonFThree
0 Replies
256 Views
Last post March 09, 2024, 10:10
by fotoroad

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors