What is the point?
I don't like the turn this thread has taken. Picking on some contributor who, as far as we know, isn't even on these forums to defend themselves, for what, a laugh?
I'm not sure what the point is, and you're right it isn't fair to the contributor (though they did open themselves up for scrutiny by posting on IS's forum how they have 16,000 files to UL -- but that was IS, not here at MSG).
However, I am very dismayed by what I see in their port. Many near duplicates, and many, many that are poorly composed, poorly exposed, and poorly keyworded. These are files that wouldn't have been accepted on IS back in 2005; they have no place in a commercial collection, IMO. Not the entire portfolio, mind you, but far too many for my comfort.