pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: Vector Vetta rebellion  (Read 44019 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

« Reply #150 on: April 15, 2011, 13:40 »
0
A few more hours and we may have another addition to the broken promises list   :'(

I'll get the "Istock Epic Fail" thread warmed up so that it's ready for action.

HAHAHA


« Reply #151 on: April 15, 2011, 13:42 »
0
A few more hours and we may have another addition to the broken promises list   :'(

I'll get the "Istock Epic Fail" thread warmed up so that it's ready for action.

LOL!

« Reply #152 on: April 15, 2011, 17:27 »
0

« Reply #153 on: April 15, 2011, 18:14 »
0
Unfortunately, it doesn't look like we're getting that promised update...

nruboc

« Reply #154 on: April 15, 2011, 18:18 »
0
Surely, they will at least have the decency to post an update today as to when they will have an answer - if they aren't going to give an actual answer today.

« Reply #155 on: April 15, 2011, 18:28 »
0
Apparently not.

« Reply #156 on: April 15, 2011, 19:14 »
0
I just don't understand why they can't eat a little crow and post that they should have had the update out, but they're sorry they're late. It wouldn't get anyone answers, but it would at least appear that they gave a flying eff about meeting their commitments.

I don't know if they have a crappy work ethic, if they're horrendously incompetent, they truly consider contributors unimportant so that it isn't really a commitment if you tell a contributor you'll do something.

If it were just this, it'd be one thing, but this has happened over and over on many issues over many weeks.

This is on topic, although it won't sound like it at first. My husband has become enamored of the program Gordon Ramsay's Kitchen Nightmares. We were discussing the IS disaster-of-the-day over dinner a few days back and my husband asked my daughter "what does Gordon Ramsay say?". "Bleep" came the answer :) Not sure if they air the swearing in the UK, but on BBC America it's bleeped out - that's how I can tell from the other side of the house if my husband is watching it - the steady stream of bleeps...

At any rate, this show is where Ramsay goes in to straighten out failing restaurants and read the riot act to various non performing staff. My husband thinks we should send Ramsay to Calgary to sort out iStock :) While I think the footage would be funny, I read an article a while back that said that the restaurants Ramsay "saves" typically end up going under anyway...

rubyroo

« Reply #157 on: April 15, 2011, 19:22 »
0
 :D

It would make for a good laugh, certainly - although I'm not sure that Gordon Ramsay and good manners/etiquette are synonymous ;)

FYI - swearing is broadcast on UK TV after 'the watershed' (i.e. after 9pm), and bleeped out before that (generally speaking - although there have been slip-ups).   I'm pretty sure I heard all the swearing when I used to watch this programme, so it must have been broadcast after the watershed here.
« Last Edit: April 15, 2011, 19:26 by rubyroo »

« Reply #158 on: April 15, 2011, 22:32 »
0
iStock could go on for months not making any kind of announcement. And they have effectively muzzled the leaders of the charge by making them swear not to disclose anything until that time. Rebellion quashed.

ShadySue

  • There is a crack in everything
« Reply #159 on: April 16, 2011, 00:44 »
0
I just don't understand why they can't eat a little crow and post that they should have had the update out, but they're sorry they're late. It wouldn't get anyone answers, but it would at least appear that they gave a flying eff about meeting their commitments.
You'd rather they lied?

« Reply #160 on: April 16, 2011, 09:14 »
0
Well, a couple of the appointed phone participants chirped in to say that there is a continuing dialogue with TPTB. IMO one thing is certain, contributor input is absolutely ineffective.

« Reply #161 on: April 16, 2011, 09:26 »
0
Well, a couple of the appointed phone participants chirped in to say that there is a continuing dialogue with TPTB. IMO one thing is certain, contributor input is absolutely ineffective.

So, lots of talk, no real action.

« Reply #162 on: April 16, 2011, 09:34 »
0
Well, a couple of the appointed phone participants chirped in to say that there is a continuing dialogue with TPTB. IMO one thing is certain, contributor input is absolutely ineffective.

So, lots of talk, no real action.

Lol! I can't confirm how much" talk", but if there is any "action" it is definitely behind the scenes.  :)

« Reply #163 on: April 16, 2011, 14:10 »
0
Hey
« Last Edit: April 16, 2011, 14:14 by Jack »

« Reply #164 on: April 16, 2011, 14:40 »
0
At least rogermexico came back and explained why they  didn't post anything this week.. OH WAIT.. no .. he didn't did he? Kudos Istock.. Classy.

« Reply #165 on: April 18, 2011, 08:58 »
0
so.....maybe this week? I'll start holding my breath now.

« Reply #166 on: April 18, 2011, 10:05 »
0
so.....maybe this week? I'll start holding my breath now.

For whom the flowers should be sent?  :D :D

nruboc

« Reply #167 on: April 18, 2011, 11:39 »
0
so.....maybe this week? I'll start holding my breath now.

For whom the flowers should be sent?  :D :D

LOL   ;D

« Reply #168 on: April 20, 2011, 07:34 »
0
I just saw RypeArts is no longer exclusive. Something to do with the rebellion?

« Reply #169 on: April 20, 2011, 12:50 »
0
I just saw RypeArts is no longer exclusive. Something to do with the rebellion?

No, he's got his own site now, and it looks very cool:

http://vectormill.com/

I'm eager to hear how it is working out for him.

« Reply #170 on: April 20, 2011, 12:54 »
0
I just saw RypeArts is no longer exclusive. Something to do with the rebellion?

No, he's got his own site now, and it looks very cool:

http://vectormill.com/

I'm eager to hear how it is working out for him.


Good for him, I wish him the best of luck.

P.S. Love your tagline...one of my fav songs.

« Reply #171 on: April 20, 2011, 15:09 »
0

« Reply #172 on: April 20, 2011, 15:11 »
0
Knowing the "heavy hand" above, I think that seems like a reasonable compromise.  Not that I have a lot of Vetta Illustration or Video quality.

« Reply #173 on: April 20, 2011, 15:38 »
0
Knowing the "heavy hand" above, I think that seems like a reasonable compromise.  Not that I have a lot of Vetta Illustration or Video quality.
I'm not sure I see it as a 'compromise' as such. Istock, as usual, were just being their greedy selves and trying to keep more of the pie. They raised prices for customers and basically tried to avoid giving anything at all to the contributors. Unfortunately for Istock this time the contributors were able to bite back and Istock have simply had to retreat somewhat. The 'compromise' will be from the contributors who are still going to have to accept a lower percentage commission whilst also having to agree to additional conditions.

lisafx

« Reply #174 on: April 20, 2011, 15:56 »
0
Well big congrats to the videographers and illustrators for hanging tough and getting some concessions.  Still not an ideal situation, but better than what was on offer before. 

If I were an exclusive illustrator or videographer, I would be working to get my portfolio ready to go independent by the end of 2012/beginning of 2013 when all the rules change. 


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
Vetta

Started by SNP « 1 2 3 4  All » iStockPhoto.com

79 Replies
27696 Views
Last post September 18, 2009, 06:30
by Adeptris
4 Replies
3431 Views
Last post September 18, 2009, 16:19
by madelaide
19 Replies
9532 Views
Last post August 17, 2010, 01:08
by lagereek
123 Replies
38841 Views
Last post December 01, 2010, 15:22
by SNP
12 Replies
5699 Views
Last post July 05, 2011, 14:45
by Shank_ali

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors