One year (and first at the same time), 300 images, 0 (zero) sales. I payed for account 30$ at the begining, not renew it as I don't see sense throwing my money away.

The same: one year 300 images, zero sales. I payed for account 30$.

I am not selling any licences on FAA because its a mess and they have no buyers

http://fineartamerica.com/profiles/semmickphoto.html

I pay $30 a year for FAA (started in Jan 2013) and make enough to make it worth my time. I did set up licensing via pixels.com for everything except my editorial images and have had one sale. I didn't expect there to be much licensing there - why would that appeal to more than a handful of image licensors? - but wanted to see how things played out.

If you have things you think might sell as prints, I'd give FAA a try, but don't do it for pixels.com

Ron, your results are great, congrats! Could you tell if you do own marketing or it was luck?

Selling enough prints to make the $30 worthwhile each year since I started there in December 2010, but no experience with licensing - like others I felt the terms weren't set up correctly. I sell prints - framed, metal, acrylic - some cards, and most recently a bunch of pillows and even an iPhone case, but sales last year were less than in 2013. I do a lot of marketing via twitter and g+ and assume that may drive traffic there or it may be just luck. I usually make back enough to pay for several years with my first sale, though this year it took a card, an iPhone case, and a couple of pillows. 

Like the micros, there are just so many images so it's harder to get seen, but one print sale will often earn me more than I make on SS in a month - sometimes several times more, so I'm sticking with them for now, but not for licensing.