Author Topic: Who has most potential for 2008 (Read 17926 times)

epixx · « **Reply #50 on:** January 24, 2008, 06:49 »

Quote from: Michael on January 24, 2008, 04:27

Quote from: epixx on January 24, 2008, 01:56
Quote from: ldambies on January 23, 2008, 17:28
My mistake it must be the size of my pics I was uploading 5 MP and it is 6MP minimum that's why it probably did not work
L

I've run into the 6MP barrier as well a couple of times. No cropping allowed. I need a new camera

Why not cropping? Nobody will see it if you do it right. I do interpolation with Photoshop +30-40% and there are never artefacts or other visible photo-errors...

I agree, but I have too many versions of each photo already. It's easier to upload what is already large enough.

Michael · « **Reply #51 on:** January 24, 2008, 17:40 »

Quote from: epixx on January 24, 2008, 06:49

Quote from: Michael on January 24, 2008, 04:27
Quote from: epixx on January 24, 2008, 01:56
Quote from: ldambies on January 23, 2008, 17:28
My mistake it must be the size of my pics I was uploading 5 MP and it is 6MP minimum that's why it probably did not work
L

I've run into the 6MP barrier as well a couple of times. No cropping allowed. I need a new camera

Ok, but you can do such things with a batch automatically....

Why not cropping? Nobody will see it if you do it right. I do interpolation with Photoshop +30-40% and there are never artefacts or other visible photo-errors...

I agree, but I have too many versions of each photo already. It's easier to upload what is already large enough.

Why not using a batch? That´s very easy

helix7 · « **Reply #52 on:** February 07, 2008, 01:30 »

I don't get BigStock. They should be doing so much better. They are marketing, running nice ads in design magazines alongside StockXpert and istock, and yet sales there are still pretty dismal.

sharpshot · « **Reply #53 on:** February 07, 2008, 03:01 »

Sales with bigstock seem to vary amongst us a lot. They are much better than 123rf for me but some people don't do well there. Last month was a big BME and I made more there than with DT but BigStock accept 97% of my uploads while DT is fussy.

DanP68 · « **Reply #54 on:** February 07, 2008, 03:22 »

BigStock produces for me, slow and steady. Here are 2 stats to scratch your head over Sharpshot. BigStock has outsold DT for me over 7 months, and my DT acceptance rate over the last 3 months is higher than it is at BigStock.

epixx · « **Reply #55 on:** February 07, 2008, 03:40 »

Quote from: Michael on January 24, 2008, 17:40

Quote from: epixx on January 24, 2008, 06:49
Quote from: Michael on January 24, 2008, 04:27
Quote from: epixx on January 24, 2008, 01:56
Quote from: ldambies on January 23, 2008, 17:28
My mistake it must be the size of my pics I was uploading 5 MP and it is 6MP minimum that's why it probably did not work
L

I've run into the 6MP barrier as well a couple of times. No cropping allowed. I need a new camera

Ok, but you can do such things with a batch automatically....

Why not cropping? Nobody will see it if you do it right. I do interpolation with Photoshop +30-40% and there are never artefacts or other visible photo-errors...

I agree, but I have too many versions of each photo already. It's easier to upload what is already large enough.

Why not using a batch? That´s very easy

Updated my routines and uploading batch. Works great. A bit slow though.

Marburg · « **Reply #56 on:** February 13, 2008, 13:09 »

Don't count Geckostock out. While they were slow at the beginning, sales are now starting to move. I just sold 5 there myself.
Marburg

Quote from: epixx on December 23, 2007, 13:13

Snapvillage has an obvious potential. I just had my first 10 dollar sale there, and they're still in beta.

Featurpics, but only if photographers helps by promoting their portfolio there. For me, that's an obvious thing to do since they generate the best profit per sale.

Bigstock has been developing nicely, and with their new price structure, they have the potential to become a proper earner.

And as for Lucky Oliver: to me, the only thing they have proved so far, is that they are good at designing websites. Unfortunately, their abilities to sell my images are close to zero. It's like driving a Ferrari with no engine: completely useless.

gbcimages · « **Reply #57 on:** February 13, 2008, 14:27 »

BTP FOR ME,I'VE HAD MORE SALES THERE THEN ALL THE OTHERS PUT TOGETHER

madelaide · « **Reply #58 on:** February 13, 2008, 15:51 »

What's BTP?

Regards,
Adelaide

gbcimages · « **Reply #59 on:** February 13, 2008, 15:57 »

I mean BigStock

MicrostockGroup Sponsors

Poll

Who has the most potential of being one of the next big 6 - you get three votes.

Author Topic: Who has most potential for 2008 (Read 17926 times)

epixx

Michael

helix7

sharpshot

DanP68

epixx

Marburg

gbcimages

madelaide

gbcimages

Related Topics

Sponsors

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors