hi i notice that alamy is one of the option too, i wonder what is the impact for those who already had a portfolio in alamy.

Just want to tell, that we`re now also offering AGE Fotostock with the included "THP Network" as an option.

For Microstock-RF-Photos = LBRF Price Level (Light Budget Royalty Free Collection)
For all other photos the "normal" AGE / THP sales with RM or RV (depends on your Zoonar Licence Settings)

AGE / THP have 51 affiliated photo agencys yet.

Is it better to upload straight to Alamy or through an agency ( like Zoonar)? Because I heard that agencies with large portfolios have better placement than individuals with small portfolios. But, again, an agency will take its share from your sale  .

so let's say for alamy contributors, we should just opt in those files that are not available in alamy?

does it mean our files that opt-in in alamy will appear under alamy search engine as well?

Quote from: Michael on October 17, 2010, 13:25

You just should release the photos which are not there yet. This is not only for alamy. This is also for AGE/THP and other partners. Except Fotofinder and APIS, because every agency has own channels for own costuimers there...

Correct, the best is to opt-in only thoose files for alamy that are not avialable at alamy yet. So you can prevent double releases there.

I�m not sure if i understand you second question correctly, but all photos you are opt-in from zoonar to alamy are really going from zoonar to alamy. To have sells at alamy they have to be placed in the alamy search engine...