pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: Greetings from a newbie 2 months in, and early experiences  (Read 7570 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

« on: February 15, 2014, 15:19 »
+3
Hello everyone, I'm Jason. I've been quietly learning from many in this forum for 3-4 months now, and as a newbie have had little to say, but now that I have made a bit of a go of it, and have about 2 months of actual participation, uploading, and a mere 11 files sold, I thought it was time to write a post in order to (a) share my early experiences as a stock photography newbie in 2014 (I missed the gold rush, but I only learned photography in '07, and the idea never occurred to me until last fall), (b) hope that some veterans and recognizable microtstock group members can chime in with some advice, and (c) ponder if it's worth it going forward, since this is clearly a tough racket.

I am only doing this part-time, so it's not like I can upload hundreds per month, but I do hope to actually have enough to make some rrasonably decent extra income by the end of the year, so I am hoping to have 1,000 images at the various agencies by the end of the year. I'll need to start getting to about 90-100 per month.

I am presuming I will never be an exclusive anywhere, so I am not spending as much time as possible making as many new shots as I can and delivering them to iStock then moving to the next batch. Rather, I am spending a lot of time (too much probably) on the computer, going through old photos and submitting each one of them I process to multiple sites (5 so far), and trying to learn how to be better with Photoshop and how to establish a more efficient worklfow. My portfolio is, for now, oriented toward travel and architecture and landscape, probably typical of people like me who started photography with no intent to make money. The made-for-stock oriented shots are a totally new thing for me, and learning how to shoot with studio lighting is also new. But of course I will add more of these types of images in, trying to do things more commercially. With that said, I'll write a little bit about what I have learned/observed, some of the issues I am facing, and ask for anyone to offer ideas. All comments/criticisms are welcome.

1. Workflow. This has been the hardest thing so far. I shoot with Nikon so all I ever did before was process RAW using Capture NX2, which I like, but is somewhat limited, and is very poor for embedding keywords. I am also learning Photoshop techniques (helpful for real distortion/perspective correction, as well as for the filters I can play with in case I want to make snazzy/stylized versions for Fine Art America (I probably do), and for Nik Dfine noise reduction.

It turns out that one of my major impediments to developing an efficient and faster workflow is the fact that most of my shots were shot with a Nikon D300, which was kind of noisy even at the lowest native ISO of 200, especially with rich blue skies, which I frequently shot with a polarizing filter, if viewd at 100%. I had no idea back then it would cause headaches for me today. And I am finding that the challenge of striking a balance between de-noising and retaining non-blur/focus, in order to avoid getting dinged by the likes of shutterstock and fotolia for one or the other, is a particularly tall order, given the somewhat noisy images I have. I realize I could shoot only new shots and only at ISO 100 from now on, but I have some good images of great places like Paris, Istanbul, Great Wall, and others that I consider commercially viable (proven by the fact that 6 of my 11 sales so far are this type of image), and I really want to put them up. That may be a mistake and I might be better off only uploading images shot knowing what I know about stock now, and I am shooting some, but I lean towards mostly wanting to get my old shots online because I have more to learn at the computer than anything. And I don't know how to make this faster other than by slogging away putting in the time and just hoping I improve. I keep thinking I should learn lightroom, but one reason I haven't gone ahead with that is that when you enter keywords in your specified order, it re-orders them alphabetically, which I gather is fine for some sites, but not for the others (I forget which ones) which have a search engine that recognizes the leading keywords most heavily. So I keyword in Photoshop, even images I edit initially and export to jpeg from CaptureNX2 (ouch).

2. The sites. So far, I am submitting to istock, Fotolia, Dreamstime, 123RF and Pond5. I am planning to add BigStock, Canstock and Deposit. Why not Shutterstock? Mostly because I suck. Sometimes I feel like they are unreasonable (I know I'm not the only one) but it's their site, and I have to tow the line. I've been rejected 5 times with them so far, by trying to de-noise old images. It was a bad idea because then the problem becomes "focus." On several submissions, I've had them say as many as 3 images "would have" passed, then turn around and reject those that they said were good enough, the next time, by the next reviewer. Yes, I have had a total of more than 7 images that have been deemed good enough at one time or another by SS, but never all at the same time, and I don't dare include them all in the same submission next time because 5 of those have also been subsequently rejected, after having been considered passable during an earlier submission if the others were also good. And two of them, they said the only problem was the category, which next time were submitted with the correct category but then they decided composition was inadequate. I maintain the composition was creative, unique and interesting, yet not standard and not stock-oriented and thus, in the line of fire. I understand though. The owner of SS didn't get to be a billionaire by having low standards. The onus is on me to get into SS on their terms. Their standard are, if at times unfair in comparison with other crappy images they already have in their collection, clearly extremely high and I am determined to eventually get in. But I learned that noise reducing usually doesn't earn a pass with them because the blurring inherent in noise reduction becomes the issue.

Fotolia is the 2nd most dofficult for me to get images accepted at. My acceptance rate is less than 30%! I'm sure the de-noising/focus slapbacks SS has given me have negativelyu affected my acceptance rate here too. But either way, it's rough going over there. But despite only having 22 with them so far, I have sold 3 files there, and the first was when I was stuck at 16.

Dreamstime can be tough, and while not as tough as Fotolia, they have rejected some that Fotolia, the toughest (non-SS) site, have not only accepted, but sold. 2 of my 3 files sold on Fotolia were rejectd by Dreamstime. This makes me scratch my head but whatever.

123RF accepts almost everything, but what sucks about them is they have actually accepted some of my lowest quality submissions, which I'll be surprised if they ever sell, while rejecting some of my best shots, again, including some that have sold at Fotolia. 2 to be precise. Weird.

Pond5 seems to accept everything, and indeed, almost convey the impression they are just oh-so-grateful to have images at all, since they send a thank you note. I sell very few at $10 & up, keeping most images there low priced because even half of that will be more than I have made on any sale so far, but still no sales there despite 78 images.

iStock seems to be very strict in their application process (a friend of my was rejected with good shots) but accepts almost everything once you're in, with the single area of strict judging is as it applies to logos and faces. They even ask for model releases where I have blurred faces beyond recognition, so they are hyper-rigid about it but I take it with a grain of salt. Aside from 3 sales each at DT and FT, my 5 other sales have only come from iStock, and all were basically backgrounds of some sort, except for one plate of diced cucumbers. My first file sold was at iStock through the partner program.

3. The pics. I haven't yet submitted a handful of my best images, almost because I am considering them to be worth more thhan 27 cents and looking at better options for selling them (maybe Alamy, maybe Symbiostock, maybe FAA), especially since I am not really making any real money at this point, and just learning. This is only several dozen or so. Otherwise, I'm almost being random about what I am choosing to upload now. I've done some textured backgrounds, and 4 have sold at istock. I need to get better at those and I can. I see tons of textures now around town and I am shooting them as I find them and have the time (again this is a part-time thing). Plus, I am trying to learn white background shooting, so I am about to start a new process soon: cook my meals, shoot my meals on white background, eat my meals. And oh yeah, assemble some food too, for staged props. I've been looking around on iStock to get a feel for what sells. I have no real ability to shoot people for now, as I live far from family and won't hire models since I don't know what I'm doing.

So that's my early experiences.

I'm already starting to think about how long this will/should go on, and if I should. I'm not stopping now because I don't have enough images online to go by. The thing about this is, none of the 11 images I've sold so far, have sold for more than 75 cents. I realize my portfolio is too miniscule to form a firm judgement, but while I was pleased to have sales, I have to wonder how much effort will have to be put in to make decent money. I've put in a lot so far and yet don't have many images up. It's a slow process, and a hard slog, for sure. I wish I had some suggestions for being quicker.

As for money and return, I have read with keen interest the idea of Return Per Image, and what it should be. For non-exclusives, shutterstock seems mandatory to have a reasonable RPI, but while I see some people say $1 per year per image is reasonable, especially for Alamy, I wouldn't continue if that's all I earned, given how long it takes me to process, keyword, describe (embedded in Photoshop), upload, and categorize every image on the various sites. It would be nice to get to $5 annually per image, but that won't happen til I step up my game as a photpographer *and* as an image processor, and also not until I get into SS. So I'd say $2-3 RPI annually for now is a target to shoot for, and then see how close I come to getting there. And from what I read, I think I should judge this on the basis of how many files I have *on average* per site. Is this the correct way to determine it? I have 78 on Pond5 (when they approve my 11 pending), 61 on istock (11 pending), 55 on 123rf (11 pending), 34 on dreamstime (11 pending), 22 on fotolia, 15 on Alamy. That's 265 total, but only 44 images per site average. Should I then think that (assuming I will be on shutterstock soon), if I consider it reasonable to earn $4 annually per image, the current portfolio should earn $176 annually and $14 this month? Even without shutterstock, I could only expect to earn half that, which is $7. I'm not even sure I will earn $7 this month, which is the $2 annual RPI mark. So while I am not yet considering throwing in the towel (it's far too early, and I have been enjoying learning) it's clearly not worth it financially to continue at this rate for much longer, or shoot stuff I don't enjoy. My total so far is somewhere around $4.50-$5 in the 5 weeks since files started to sell. What I am more likely to do is increase my portfolio tenfold before really deciding. Or, make that eleven-fold, getting it to 500 images average across the sites. If I can yield $4 annually/image, that's $167 per month. I'd continue at that rate. Any less than $3, I'd probably bag it, or quit as a regular thing I work at, shooting stuff I don't enjoy, and only uploading when I have stuff I really enjoyed shooting.

I know there is no way for anyone to tell me how much I earn, but I am thinking out loud here. I just hope I can improve my efficiency and workflow so I can get to 400-500 images rather quickly, and improve overall both at the computer and with my camera. Thanks for listening, and sorry for the long post to anyone who may have read this far and been disappointed. :) I'm looking forward to continuing to learn from everyone here.








« Reply #1 on: February 15, 2014, 18:31 »
+3
You're right it's a long post.  Microstock is a tough way to make money and for you to be successful you must have:

1. Volume
2. Saleability (there's a need)
3. Technical quality (image quality)
4. Differentiation - the market is saturated and finding a niche is an advantage in today's microstock
5. Good key wording

You also need to know the sites, their quirks, monitor calibration, how to inspect your own images before uploading, Model release management (if you're shooting people or pets), image preparation (sharpening [or not], levels, sensor spots, noise, etc). 

Finally, since you are new to MS I would grow some thick skin and ask for image critique.  You will NEVER get everyone to agree on the image, whether it's good enough or not, but you can pick up some decent advice.

Hope that helps.

« Reply #2 on: February 15, 2014, 18:54 »
+3
Ill second what mantis wrote and add:

Develop a workflow where you write keywords into the iptc
learn to produce pop and pep in photoshop
develop an eye for stockphotos, shot for the customers, not for you.
photograph keywords.
forget your old images, they sound like they dont do very well, and begin to shoot new ones, where you avoid quality problems, so you dont waste your time by repairing things.


farbled

« Reply #3 on: February 15, 2014, 19:00 »
+4
I would strongly recommend something like Lightroom for workflow, or Bridge (with Photoshop). It sounds like your workflow is a bit involved. To me that says (without seeing your images) that it's possible you are having some exposure issues, and that the more you work an image, the more you introduce quality issues with it. I could be completely wrong though since we can't see what you've submitted.

I am somewhat surprised you're getting so many noise issues with a D300. I have a D300s and have almost no rejections for noise even with submissions up to ISO800. I don't use any filters though, so that might be something you could try (shooting the same things with and without). I used to use a D200 which was notorious for noise and could get ISO400 images in sometimes. Also, my workflow per image is measure in seconds (maybe a minute sometimes) in order to keep my costs low. I consider my time a cost.

Regarding agencies, they are all different and look for different things. All you can really do is work with them and develop a feel for them over time. What works, where they have the most customers/subjects that sell/etc. You can read about them here and other places as well.

I'm a hobbyist as well, and the number one thing I'm kicking myself for is getting into Microstock so soon after I picked up a camera for the first time. It is a fun, potentially lucrative and busy industry, but it rewards a specific mindset and I discovered that after a few years I could not frame a shot in my mind without including ad-space, or not taking advantage of a nice picture simply because it wasn't commercially viable or I couldn't get the technical quality needed to submit it. It took a long time for me to unlearn that and take photos for myself again.

The other thing I do, as a hobbyist, is I don't pray over the numbers. I'm a photographer because I cannot imagine not having a camera in my hand to relax and enjoy life. Stock is a fun pastime where I can make extra money (gear, vacations, etc). I don't have the volume or interest in doing it full time. To me that would take some of the joy out of it for me (not to slight anyone who does of course, just speaking for me).

So I guess my best advice would be, go shoot the pictures you love to shoot, nail down your quality and workflow, and then search out the best outlets for those photos. If you want quality suggestions, go to the Shutterstock critique forum. It is an eye opener for new stock shooters. Maybe micro isn't where you want to be, maybe RM, maybe fine art sites, or self selling or something else. Good luck!

« Reply #4 on: February 16, 2014, 09:14 »
+1
Thanks very much to all three of you for replying.

@Mantis: I think volume will just be a matter of getting there over time, through improvements in workflow. Salability is something I have to work on, since I am new and need to learn more of what buyers want. Technical quality I can do with new images but older, already noisy images are problematic to work with. Ive long since grown a thick skin and am happy to ask for image critique. But I see the critique forum is not very active. What do I need to know about monitor calibration? Im completely clueless in that.

@JPSDK, thanks, I do enter/embed keywords in the IPTC. What do you mean photograph keywords? But yeah, Ive spent a lot of time repairing things. I maybe should bag that. Ive got several hundred new ones I can work on, half of which may be viable for stock.

@farbled, one reason I didnt get into Lightroom yet (though I will reconsider) is the fact that when you enter keywords, it doesnt retain the order you put them in, while Photoshop keeps them in the same order. This, despite both being Adobe products. Doesnt make sense! 2nd reason is I presume I can do all the same edits in Photoshop that Lightroom allows, and then some. But yes, if Lightroom speeds up the workflow significantly, Il have to consider how important it is to keep keywords in the order I want them.

Most of the noise Im dealing with at ISO 200 from my D300 pics are of polarized blue skies. Its not an issue where there are details. But heck, I have a D7000 now, which is supposed to be even better regarding noise, but I shot some similar polarized blue sky pics at ISO 100, and I still see some noise in them. Frustrating, though its not terrible. Id be glad to send you my 100% images to show you.

Good final advice. Ill keep shooting stuff I enjoy first, but want to learn and add studio white backgrounds as well anyway since it should help the income and is worth learning.

« Reply #5 on: February 16, 2014, 09:36 »
+1
Thanks very much to all three of you for replying.

@Mantis: I think volume will just be a matter of getting there over time, through improvements in workflow. Salability is something I have to work on, since I am new and need to learn more of what buyers want. Technical quality I can do with new images but older, already noisy images are problematic to work with. Ive long since grown a thick skin and am happy to ask for image critique. But I see the critique forum is not very active. What do I need to know about monitor calibration? Im completely clueless in that.

@JPSDK, thanks, I do enter/embed keywords in the IPTC. What do you mean photograph keywords? But yeah, Ive spent a lot of time repairing things. I maybe should bag that. Ive got several hundred new ones I can work on, half of which may be viable for stock.

@farbled, one reason I didnt get into Lightroom yet (though I will reconsider) is the fact that when you enter keywords, it doesnt retain the order you put them in, while Photoshop keeps them in the same order. This, despite both being Adobe products. Doesnt make sense! 2nd reason is I presume I can do all the same edits in Photoshop that Lightroom allows, and then some. But yes, if Lightroom speeds up the workflow significantly, Il have to consider how important it is to keep keywords in the order I want them.

Most of the noise Im dealing with at ISO 200 from my D300 pics are of polarized blue skies. Its not an issue where there are details. But heck, I have a D7000 now, which is supposed to be even better regarding noise, but I shot some similar polarized blue sky pics at ISO 100, and I still see some noise in them. Frustrating, though its not terrible. Id be glad to send you my 100% images to show you.

Good final advice. Ill keep shooting stuff I enjoy first, but want to learn and add studio white backgrounds as well anyway since it should help the income and is worth learning.


All contributors need to ensure that what they see on their monitors in terms of color is the same (or very close to the same) aw what the inspectors see and ultimately what the customer sees and gets.  Without calibration, what you see on your monitor might look dynamite, but when it gets to an agency it might look green, or simply by way off of SRGB colors.  So get around this you need something like Spyder software and a Spyder. http://spyder.datacolor.com/portfolio-view/spyder4elite/.  The standard I use is 6500k color temp at 2.2 gamma. The Spyder will create a profile and when you boot up your computer it will load it and you will see far more accurate colors that the "industry" uses. There are other color calibration tools, I chose Spyder because that's what I use.

Goofy

« Reply #6 on: February 16, 2014, 12:51 »
+2
"You're right it's a long post.  Microstock is a tough way to make money and for you to be successful you must have:"


better add Shutter in that list as well. The provide 40% to 50% of my total income.

Get your 10 images ready and  post them here - we can guide to being accepted by them. Shutter is a must... 8)



« Reply #7 on: February 16, 2014, 13:53 »
+2
I know shutterstock can be very frustrating to get accepted but I would advise you keep trying as it has now become almost essential if you want to make a decent no of dollars.

« Reply #8 on: February 16, 2014, 14:09 »
+9
I'll pass on some advice I was given when I started:
1) Get accepted at SS, that's the majority of earnings unless you go exclusive at Istock
2) Don't bother submitting old pictures off your hard drive.  Unless you want to do it as a learning experience it is a waste of time.  The quality, subjects and composition will not be suitable for stock.
3) Get a copy of Lightroom and spend time learning it and developing a fast efficient workflow.  This is a numbers game and no longer can you afford more than a few minutes on any particular image.  The return is not there.
4) Become a master at key wording.  Your image may get accepted but it will not sell without good key words.
5) Unless you go macro-stock with travel and such, stock photos are boring and require a certain 'look' that can be used in different ways by the buyers.  Different sites have different 'looks' they like, you need to learn what works well at which site.
6) If you are serious submit your images to the critique forum over at SS, they will rip them apart and make you cry.  Get over it, and shoot something they grudgingly admit might possibly be good enough.  When you can do that submit 10 to SS and you will get accepted.
7) To make money at this you need to be able to get accepted several hundred top quality, well composed, interesting, and salable images every month.  Month after month.  $1 per image per year is a number often mentioned and I suspect it is fairly accurate.  But only as an average.  Better images higher return, poorer images lower return.  But better means more salable not just better image quality.  Best image in the world of an apple on white just is not going to matter because it has been done so often that it is hard for yours to get found.

No offense meant but if you have been rejected 5 times at SS you really need to step up your game.  Lots of other sites will accept your images but getting accepted is not the same as selling.  This is tough business which requires talent and very hard work.  Days of taking old images off your computer and making money are long, long gone.

Best advice I can give, if you really want this?  Put images on SS critique forum and learn from getting ripped apart.

« Reply #9 on: February 17, 2014, 02:16 »
+1
I clung to Capture for waaaaayyy too long.  Get used to Lightroom.  I missed the control points in Capture, but bought Viveza to use it via Photoshop (very rarely). 

I keyword in Photoshop, but sometimes batch add core keywords in Lightroom and top them up in Photoshop.

You have to think forward, not backward.  Your time would be better invested making shot lists and scouting locations and shooting new photos -- not repairing old ones.  There is nothing wrong with pulling up an old photo now and then and prepping it, but if you need to spend more than a few minutes each on a harddrive full of old photos you are missing the whole point of "micro stock".

I also suggest new photos only for Shutterstock!  Even if they have passed previous inspections, SS is known to pass then flunk in the next batch.  10 shots different varieties (i.e. landscapes, people, clichs, architecture, animals....).  On the first batch it is okay to downsize the photos to 4 mp to hide a lot of sins.

Good luck!

« Reply #10 on: February 17, 2014, 03:26 »
+1
Nothing wrong with Capture imho

« Reply #11 on: February 17, 2014, 07:41 »
+1
Loved the post, as a new submitter (started in the mid of 2014)  i can relate a lot to your post.

Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2


gillian vann

  • *Gillian*
« Reply #12 on: February 18, 2014, 07:56 »
+3
if you've got PS then you've got Bridge and ACR,  is the same engine as LR, just looks yucky, but will certainly speed up your workflow.

It's probably a good experience to upload to all those other sites, but soon enough you'll delete them. I'm probably a year or so ahead of you and this year I cut back to just my top 5. 

I think shooting new stuff for SS is ideal, as they are very strict. iS has become so lax and accepts a lot, and SS has clamped down. As mentioned the different sites have their own "personality" so sometimes you'll shrug off a rejection because that's just the way they are. you could re-edit for them, but I just keep moving forward, so long as the file is on a few sites, i'm ok. sometimes your rejected files become top sellers elsewhere.

« Reply #13 on: February 18, 2014, 11:56 »
+1
Storyboard ideas and setups in thumbnail sketches in a notebook - that way you always have a stock of ideas to be getting on with, especially useful to fall back on when your creativity is at a low ebb.


Sent from my laptop using hairy fingers.

« Reply #14 on: February 18, 2014, 15:34 »
0
Thanks for sharing your process, Jason.  I am new as well and haven't gotten to your point yet so it's been very helpful to see your roadblocks and to hear the advice that others have provided.

« Reply #15 on: February 19, 2014, 07:03 »
0
@mantis, thanks again. I guess I have to learn about this. I just did the calibration tool in Mac. But you mention SRGB. Is that the standard? I though Adobe RGB 1998 was standard.

goofy & paws, Ill keep trying SS, thanks. If I post here, how should I upload? Just small crops at 100% or the full pics? I assume I should use stronger compression cause some of these are 10MB pics at full size.

@jatrax, no offense taken. I wrote about my failures willingly because I want to hear it. I need to step up my game, but I also havent been stepping with the right tools, since all I have done so far is try to dig out and de-noise old images I made without much thought to noise at 100%. I havent shot exclusively for shutterstock. But I will. And I do have maybe 4 or 5 that can pass muster now. As for their forums, should I upload full size pics or just crops @ 100%?

One other point, you mention that unless I go macro with travel and such . . . well, is that a viable option? Thats what I have now, should I just focus more on macro-stock? And what else would that be except Alamy? Ive uploaded 2 dozen travel type pics to Alamy to start.

@gillian, thanks for your post as well. What top 5 are you now restricting your submissions to? Ive been reading Steve Heap and he seems to use around 20 places, but since Im so slow that may now be a good idea for me. Aside from trying to get into SS, Im submitting now to IS, FT, DR, P5, 123. The latter two, no sales yet. I was thinking of joining can stock and big stock, maybe deposit but they seem to be hated more and more so maybe I will pass.

« Reply #16 on: May 15, 2014, 08:35 »
+2
Great thread - valuable info for newbies like me. I just got started this January and I am currently uploading images to SS, iS, DT, FT, 123, DP and YM. I have a very small port, about 100 images. My goal is to upload 10 images a week. Microstock has so far been a great experience. Going through the appliaction process at SS was an eye-opener. I got great advice from the SS forum and was able to pass on the second submission. I really enjoy doing this, but it would not be feasible without my current job. The income is very modest, but on the rise. :-) But the best part is that I am improving my photography. Income-wise, I hope that the money earned in time can finance a photography trip somewhere once a year. :-)


ultimagina

« Reply #17 on: May 15, 2014, 16:11 »
+1
Despite the advice given by some of my predecessors, I would not neglect the old photos, especially if you shot them RAW.
So, go for Lightroom (as advised here) and give them a second chance. Don't push your luck with heavy processing: don't push the exposure or that shadow slider too hard, if you don't want a "noise" or "poor lighting" rejection.

SS accepted me only the 3rd time, last year in September. Immediately after the acceptance, I managed to scramble about 150 photos sitting idle on my HDD.

Some of them sell very well, today!

Since September, I doubled my port and, for the past 3 months, I made, on SS, more than x3 (almost x4 in April) the minimum payment. And this is about 50% of what I get from all the other agencies combined.

Good luck!

« Last Edit: May 15, 2014, 16:21 by ultimagaina »

« Reply #18 on: May 15, 2014, 23:35 »
+2
I used to use Capture NX2 as well - but now you can use the Nik filters (Viveza, Dfine, Color Effex, Silver Effex, etc), right in Lightroom and you have all the control points and it is so much faster than NX2. They are all available as a set from Google (for free if you've bought any of them in the past). The switch sped up my workload incredibly.

I'd agree that you should shoot new stuff but if you have old images you feel good about, working on them is a good way to learn the various software programs, so IMHO it's not a waste of time.

Best of luck with your efforts!

« Reply #19 on: May 16, 2014, 02:07 »
+4
Hello Jason, I enjoyed reading your long post and so thought I would respond with an (almost) as long one.  I started about the same time, have a similar number of images uploaded as you, similar sales, and a similar backlog of image types.  So I understand where you are coming from.

From one newbie to another:

1.  Hang in there with SS - I just got accepted last night - 3rd time lucky.  I started a thread about downsizing to 6MP to get accepted a few weeks ago, which is still going on and on.  My advice, just do it - I had 9 out of 10 accepted technically this time (1 rejected for poor lighting) at 6mp, compared to 5 out of 10 last time at full res.  And, frankly, philosophically, I see no point uploading full res images to be sold for such low prices.

2.  Use Lightroom - I am still trying to work out the most efficient workflow, but apart from other reasons already mentioned, it allows for non-destructive editing and bulk changes and key wording to images.  Plus there are a lot of relatively cheap presets out there for quick clean-ups and to give images a bit of a pop, which cuts workflow time right down.  And smart collections are a great way to track what you are doing - or would be if I got my own workflow sorted.  The keyword order doesn't bother me, by the time you have to anyway fiddle around with things like categories, etc when uploading, its not that much extra work to shift around a bit.  I just try and get the 5-6 most relevant at the top, and don't worry about the rest.

3.  I am also grappling with where to place images.  Like you, most of my backlog is travel and similar themes and I don't have releases, and I neither have the time nor probably sufficiently professional Photoshop skills to clone out every little possible property issue. So to the extent that I have uploaded these to micro sites, many are being accepted as editorial only. These images are never likely to be volume sellers, although it does surprise me how many travel images are on the micro sites (and how that must impact on sales on macro or mid-stock sites).

4.  I have also been accepted to Alamy and started uploading there.  I am leaning towards putting all these older travel images on Alamy instead of micro and see what happens. I also kind of like the fact that most of the coding for Alamy is done after the images have been accepted and not before, another time saver if a proportion of images on micro-sites will be rejected.  I know others hate the Alamy upload process, but I find it far less frustrating and time-consuming than (say) iStock, even using DeepMeta.  The occasional sale on Alamy might anyway outweigh what I might expect to earn for the same sort of images on micro sites over (say) a 12 month period. I would love to hear the views of others on that. 

One thing to note, if you upload unreleased images to Alamy they will be classified as RM.  If they are RM, you cannot have them on other sites as RF.   But you can have them as RF on both sites if you wish, though you may be cannibalising your own sales if customers do a price comparison.  For example, I have some images where I strongly disagree a property release is required, e.g. iStock take a particularly hard-line (and sometimes just silly) view of when a property release is needed.  So they are RF (editorial) there, but I have them as RF on Alamy as well because I have taken the view that a release is not required. 

So, upshot is, after finally getting accepted to SS, I may have little to upload for awhile until I start shooting more stock specific.

5.  Don't beat yourself up over inconsistent rejections.  Whatever stated criteria, at the end of the day it is a subjective assessment.  Dreamstime seem to accept about 85-90% of my images, but my best rejection so far has come from them:  "its not quite what we are looking for".   Fotolia hate 80% of my photos too so I will probably stop uploading there anyway, putting aside the DPC issue. I don't have the luxury of time (or probably skill) to shoot with a particular agency in mind and I don't yet have a real feel for what each wants.  I just upload away and hope for the best but will not doubt get more of a feel over time! (Funnily enough, Fotolia accepts a higher percentage of my quite dreadful iPhone snaps submitted through their Instant app, and one of those quite awful iPhone travel shots has sold 4 times in the last month on Fotolia and is currently the first image to come up as 'relevant' when the particular city is searched - go figure.)

6.  As I read and get more and more immersed in this, I need to draw breath sometimes and keep reminding myself to keep some perspective.  Like you, this is not my day job.  While I have been wanting to upload to stock for a year or two, I have not had the time to make any kind of start until the last few months.  While I don't want to sell myself or my images short (and that is why I am removing my high res images from Fotolia), I also try and remember that these images have been sitting on my hard drive doing nothing for months and even years.  Right now, with everything I have read and experienced to bring my lofty ambitions back to earth, I will consider I have achieved a huge amount if my photography becomes self-supporting, i.e. if I earn enough to cover the costs of some new equipment, software, and with a bit of luck some % of travel costs.  Baby steps.




ShadySue

  • There is a crack in everything
« Reply #20 on: May 16, 2014, 06:53 »
+2
4.  I have also been accepted to Alamy and started uploading there.  I am leaning towards putting all these older travel images on Alamy instead of micro and see what happens. I also kind of like the fact that most of the coding for Alamy is done after the images have been accepted and not before, another time saver if a proportion of images on micro-sites will be rejected.  I know others hate the Alamy upload process, but I find it far less frustrating and time-consuming than (say) iStock, even using DeepMeta.  The occasional sale on Alamy might anyway outweigh what I might expect to earn for the same sort of images on micro sites over (say) a 12 month period. I would love to hear the views of others on that. 


Manage your expectations. Many buyers have deep discounts for bulk buying and you can have very low sales there which can be as low as <$3 to you (though to be fair, in my case that's from the UK newspaper scheme, which you can opt out of.) There is no way of 'shielding' your rare subject images from these discounts, just like you can't on e.g. Getty.  >:( :'(

Also check the rivals to your images. Again, in my experience, there are either hundreds/thousands of rival images with better search placement, or if there are very few, buyers aren't interested. Just like on iStock. Of course, you may have found a different unsupplied location which buyers have been wishing for all the time. Or maybe today's unloved place will be tomorrow's hotspot - we can dream!

Quote
One thing to note, if you upload unreleased images to Alamy they will be classified as RM.  If they are RM, you cannot have them on other sites as RF.   But you can have them as RF on both sites if you wish, though you may be cannibalising your own sales if customers do a price comparison.  For example, I have some images where I strongly disagree a property release is required, e.g. iStock take a particularly hard-line (and sometimes just silly) view of when a property release is needed.  So they are RF (editorial) there, but I have them as RF on Alamy as well because I have taken the view that a release is not required. 


Be very careful here. Alamy is actually far stricter than iStock about what they consider needs a release. However, you don't get rejections based on needing releases, because you don't indicate until after approval whether or not you have releases.
Alamy considers even fuzzy pixels of people, literally, tiny, tiny out of focus blobs in the background, as needing releases. (You can take them out, whereby you should label the image as having been digitally altered.) Any little part of a person needs a release.
Just about any sort of property is considered by Alamy to 'need releases' - far more than iStock would require.

I actually put 'needs release' on almost everything other than a 'lion out on the savanna' scenario on Alamy. Even if I'm 99% sure that the pic would be accepted on iS.

Alamy takes the view that it is the buyer's responsibility to check whether their use would need a release, so they might see that a small blob of pixels is never going to result in a lawsuit, so use an image commercially, even if marked needs MR, none available. Similarly, the buyer should know how to use images with property.
Example I remember not long after I started there, someone had an image rejected on iS because on a zip on a person's clothes, when zoomed right into, you could, with the eye of faith, 'just' make out YKK. It was a whole-body image IIRC so the YKK was tiny. In UK law, that would be 'incidental' and would not be actionable. But who knows what might happen in the Land of the Litigacious, or other places.

iStock took the view that anyone could buy their images in the knowledge that they can be used legally for any purpose.
Alamy puts more responsibility onto the buyer
http://www.alamy.com/customer/help/releases.asp
- provided that the seller has correctly indicated that they do not have a release, but one might be needed.

Another example: someone posted (here IIRC) about bunting with the Queen's photo on it, used during the Jubilee, and wondered if that would need a release for the Queen considering each bunting was relatively small in the image. But you'd have to consider whether someone might crop right into the Queen, then use the image commercially, no matter how unlikely that might seem to be.

Anyway, as the responsibility is 100% yours on Alamy, better safe than sorry, as you were told in your thread there. But ultimately, it's your risk to take, if you say 'no releases needed'.
« Last Edit: May 16, 2014, 06:58 by ShadySue »

« Reply #21 on: May 16, 2014, 07:15 »
+2
I am also a newbie to stock with just over a year in. Initially, I thought I would be able to quit the day job. I was delusional. But, I am obsessed with photography(started about two years ago) and stock has been a great way to learn and improve. This is a fantastic forum with interesting and differing opinions on the stock industry and you can learn a lot on here.  I am slightly voyeuristic in that I read all the posts but do not comment as I feel I have not earned that right. But newbie to newbie here is my advice:

1. Keep trying to get into SS. I only have a humble 120 photos in port with a pathetic acceptance rate.  But, I have learned ALOT from those rejections.

2. You said you do landscapes. Find somebody/anybody to model for you. Landscapes are a tough sell on stock but if you include a person in that landscape shot, it seems to add commercial value. If you only know ugly people shoot at sunset as silhouettes or shoot them facing away looking at the view. You don't need a beautiful model. 

3. Do not upload pictures that you would be embarrassed to claim. Certain sites have lax standards and take anything. In the beginning I uploaded anything and everything, I cringe when I look at some of them. But, they have sold a few  so now I hesitate to delete them and it has become a conundrum. Just don't do it.

4. Do not quit your day job!!!  I am a nurse in an inner city hospital and it is a tough gig. Believe me if I could quit I would, but that is completely unrealistic. My revised goals are to consistently increase my portfolio, shoot something different every week, learn from the rejections, and see an increase in sales every month.

Best of luck to you in your venture and thank you to all the pro's for sharing your valuable advice.

« Last Edit: May 16, 2014, 07:28 by ehrlif »

« Reply #22 on: May 16, 2014, 08:50 »
0
4.  I have also been accepted to Alamy and started uploading there.  I am leaning towards putting all these older travel images on Alamy instead of micro and see what happens. I also kind of like the fact that most of the coding for Alamy is done after the images have been accepted and not before, another time saver if a proportion of images on micro-sites will be rejected.  I know others hate the Alamy upload process, but I find it far less frustrating and time-consuming than (say) iStock, even using DeepMeta.  The occasional sale on Alamy might anyway outweigh what I might expect to earn for the same sort of images on micro sites over (say) a 12 month period. I would love to hear the views of others on that. 


Manage your expectations. Many buyers have deep discounts for bulk buying and you can have very low sales there which can be as low as <$3 to you (though to be fair, in my case that's from the UK newspaper scheme, which you can opt out of.) There is no way of 'shielding' your rare subject images from these discounts, just like you can't on e.g. Getty.  >:( :'(

Also check the rivals to your images. Again, in my experience, there are either hundreds/thousands of rival images with better search placement, or if there are very few, buyers aren't interested. Just like on iStock. Of course, you may have found a different unsupplied location which buyers have been wishing for all the time. Or maybe today's unloved place will be tomorrow's hotspot - we can dream!

Quote
One thing to note, if you upload unreleased images to Alamy they will be classified as RM.  If they are RM, you cannot have them on other sites as RF.   But you can have them as RF on both sites if you wish, though you may be cannibalising your own sales if customers do a price comparison.  For example, I have some images where I strongly disagree a property release is required, e.g. iStock take a particularly hard-line (and sometimes just silly) view of when a property release is needed.  So they are RF (editorial) there, but I have them as RF on Alamy as well because I have taken the view that a release is not required. 


Be very careful here. Alamy is actually far stricter than iStock about what they consider needs a release. However, you don't get rejections based on needing releases, because you don't indicate until after approval whether or not you have releases.
Alamy considers even fuzzy pixels of people, literally, tiny, tiny out of focus blobs in the background, as needing releases. (You can take them out, whereby you should label the image as having been digitally altered.) Any little part of a person needs a release.
Just about any sort of property is considered by Alamy to 'need releases' - far more than iStock would require.

I actually put 'needs release' on almost everything other than a 'lion out on the savanna' scenario on Alamy. Even if I'm 99% sure that the pic would be accepted on iS.

Alamy takes the view that it is the buyer's responsibility to check whether their use would need a release, so they might see that a small blob of pixels is never going to result in a lawsuit, so use an image commercially, even if marked needs MR, none available. Similarly, the buyer should know how to use images with property.
Example I remember not long after I started there, someone had an image rejected on iS because on a zip on a person's clothes, when zoomed right into, you could, with the eye of faith, 'just' make out YKK. It was a whole-body image IIRC so the YKK was tiny. In UK law, that would be 'incidental' and would not be actionable. But who knows what might happen in the Land of the Litigacious, or other places.

iStock took the view that anyone could buy their images in the knowledge that they can be used legally for any purpose.
Alamy puts more responsibility onto the buyer
http://www.alamy.com/customer/help/releases.asp
- provided that the seller has correctly indicated that they do not have a release, but one might be needed.

Another example: someone posted (here IIRC) about bunting with the Queen's photo on it, used during the Jubilee, and wondered if that would need a release for the Queen considering each bunting was relatively small in the image. But you'd have to consider whether someone might crop right into the Queen, then use the image commercially, no matter how unlikely that might seem to be.

Anyway, as the responsibility is 100% yours on Alamy, better safe than sorry, as you were told in your thread there. But ultimately, it's your risk to take, if you say 'no releases needed'.


thank you once again for your generosity in sharing your experience and advice.  Always very appreciated. 

« Reply #23 on: May 16, 2014, 08:57 »
0
Hello Jason, I join in Microstock a year ago, in the beginning, my idea about this market was a big mess.

As you do, I believe I can get 1$ per 1 image in one year, so I uploaded many many snapshots into IS, DT and other sites and full of confidence. But as time goes by, I found make money with my photos in miscrostock sites is much difficult than I thought before. I have a big portfolio but very very very less downloads!

After a year of exploration, I think we as all newbies in microstock need two things, the one is patient, another is hardworking.

I think our photo is much like the goods in the supermarket, there are many different or similar files in the storage rack already and there still are lots of excellence pictures added into it everyday. And as newbie's photo, it usually lack of competitiveness, you can not make sure every customer come to this supermarket will buy your files instead of other's, it's a kind of probability event, it's the same situation not only for us but also for every contributor, the different thing is the size of the possibility.

My experiences, if you want to get sales better or even want to make living by microstock ( that is my goal), you should keep uploading to make a really big protfolio and try your best to make your pictures more and more attractive for the buyer, and the most important is the patient and confidence and the fadeless interesting in taking photo, and the last work is left to time, waiting for sales coming, if not, change your strategy and try again.

This is my experience in the past year.

« Reply #24 on: May 19, 2014, 05:25 »
0
Hi jason,
 I am also a newbie. Your sales figures are better than mine.  I started stock 2 months back with DT  IS. Got rejected at SS. On april 28  I reapplied to SS with images from  my DT portfolio. 7 were selected .  Whew. On may 7 my first sale at SS. So far  5 sales at SS. NO sales at DT. Shots of birds and insects mostly. 36 images at SS.  34 at DT, 16 pending. 8 at IS. I stopped uploading to IS. I suspect they dont look at images before passing them. Their search shows up mostly crappy images. I have noise issues with my old d300 shots. Try to use topaz denoise and detail. Sometimes get accepted. I must shoot at high iso. These are animals in our light. tough luck. Most of my rare animal shots are with a d50 don't get me started on those :) that camera was BAD at usi 800. Good luck to you. I too have to spend a lot of time on each photo.


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
50 Replies
17712 Views
Last post July 25, 2008, 07:32
by sharpshot
9 Replies
8493 Views
Last post January 25, 2011, 23:45
by dnavarrojr
4 Replies
2946 Views
Last post February 08, 2013, 13:50
by oscarcwilliams
3 Replies
1762 Views
Last post July 06, 2013, 16:45
by Leo Blanchette
14 Replies
3730 Views
Last post January 07, 2017, 05:01
by SpaceStockFootage

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors