MicrostockGroup

Microstock Photography Forum - General => Newbie Discussion => Topic started by: Wael on September 18, 2017, 15:52

Title: i wish i had that model release, lol
Post by: Wael on September 18, 2017, 15:52: got so many rejections from a site called CanStock, decided to look through the reasons of rejection, maybe i would learn something out of it, and i found this !
Title: Re: i wish i had that model release, lol
Post by: Brasilnut on September 18, 2017, 15:56: Quote
got so many rejections from a site called CanStock, decided to look through the reasons of rejection, maybe i would learn something out of it, and i found this !

;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: i wish i had that model release, lol
Post by: lostintimeline on September 21, 2017, 18:44: Dear flower can you gimme a model release so I can sell you for the big bucks??
Sure hon
Obviously the reviewer was trolling
Title: Re: i wish i had that model release, lol
Post by: SpaceStockFootage on September 21, 2017, 20:19: I know people sometimes refer to their 'lady parts' as a 'flower'... maybe the reviewer can't tell the difference!
Title: Re: i wish i had that model release, lol
Post by: Wael on September 22, 2017, 02:23: Quote from: lostintimeline on September 21, 2017, 18:44
Dear flower can you gimme a model release so I can sell you for the big bucks??
Sure hon
Obviously the reviewer was trolling
for a moment there i thought " how would I get her release 🤔 ?! " but then how would she sign! 🤔

Sent from my SM-G928C using Tapatalk
Title: Re: i wish i had that model release, lol
Post by: Wael on September 22, 2017, 02:23: Quote from: SpaceStockFootage on September 21, 2017, 20:19
I know people sometimes refer to their 'lady parts' as a 'flower'... maybe the reviewer can't tell the difference!
😂😂

Sent from my SM-G928C using Tapatalk
Title: Re: i wish i had that model release, lol
Post by: rogut on October 20, 2017, 04:31: I've had CanStock reject a photo of a duck for the same reason. Either their Submission analysis is automated and broken, or done by disenfranchised staff in a bad mood (or trying to be funny, not quite sure which)
Title: Re: i wish i had that model release, lol
Post by: Hannafate on October 22, 2017, 15:38: Sometimes a keyword will trigger it. Words like sexy, naked, bare, or underage. What keywords did you use for the flower?
Title: Re: i wish i had that model release, lol
Post by: Semmick Photo on October 23, 2017, 09:23: The second rejection reason is probably valid though. Maybe the reviewer pushed to many buttons in an eager attempt to increase his wages.
Title: Re: i wish i had that model release, lol
Post by: dbvirago on October 23, 2017, 15:24: There are fully exposed sex organs in that image.
Title: Re: i wish i had that model release, lol
Post by: sgoodwin4813 on October 24, 2017, 08:08: I stopped submitting there about 1.5 years ago because all of a sudden they were rejecting almost everything for weird reasons, even though they were accepted everywhere else. Apparently that hasn't changed.

In this case I agree with Hannafate it was probably keywords, or an overactive reviewer as suggested by Semmick. I suppose you could do an experiment to test - submit a flower with the description, "Naked flower flaunting male and female sexual organs" - which is a perfectly accurate description for that image - and see what happens.
Title: Re: i wish i had that model release, lol
Post by: Pixart on October 24, 2017, 09:52: That's too bad. That specific model is probably dead by now so you will never get that signature.
Title: Re: i wish i had that model release, lol
Post by: ShadySue on October 24, 2017, 09:59: Stick to ferns.
"Unlike many other plants, ferns do not have conspicuous reproductive parts, and were therefore deemed a suitable hobby for women during the prudish Victorian era."
http://www.theenglishgarden.co.uk/expert-advice/design-solutions/garden_features_the_fernery_1_387075 (http://www.theenglishgarden.co.uk/expert-advice/design-solutions/garden_features_the_fernery_1_387075)