Author Topic: Astronomy Picture of the Day - Erupting Volcano Anak Krakatau (Read 5337 times)

madelaide · « **on:** July 13, 2009, 16:53 »

Beautiful, isn't it?
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap090713.html

m@m · « **Reply #1 on:** July 13, 2009, 20:13 »

Very nice photo...thanks for sharing.

qwerty · « **Reply #2 on:** July 14, 2009, 06:48 »

too many artifacts, distracting branches in the top right corner.

Amazing photo.

Snufkin · « **Reply #3 on:** July 14, 2009, 07:30 »

"Not Approved:
Poor Lighting--Poor or uneven lighting, or shadows. White balance may be incorrect.
Composition--Limited commercial value due to framing, cropping, and/or composition.
++We found this file over filtered from its original appearance/quality. "

Great photo

m@m · « **Reply #4 on:** July 14, 2009, 07:42 »

LMAO!!!, qwerty and Tom

puravida · « **Reply #5 on:** July 14, 2009, 10:16 »

Although we think your image is nice (for an amateur), we regret it does not reach our level of esthetic excellence.

Note: some words have been replaced to avoid infringement of intellectual property (ie. rejection notice owned by certain esteemed reviewer)

willie · « **Reply #6 on:** July 14, 2009, 10:43 »

Quote from: Tom on July 14, 2009, 07:30

"Not Approved:
Poor Lighting--Poor or uneven lighting, or shadows. White balance may be incorrect.
Composition--Limited commercial value due to framing, cropping, and/or composition.
++We found this file over filtered from its original appearance/quality. "

Great photo

NOT APPROVED.
This is a snapshot (Image Deleted).

lurkertwo · « **Reply #7 on:** July 14, 2009, 11:31 »

Quote from: Perseus on July 14, 2009, 10:43

This is a snapshot (Image Deleted).

"Erupting volcanoes are a very well covered subject in our data base or the subject of your image is too specific. We are looking for images that exceed the technical quality and creativity of the images already online. Please take a few minutes to browse through the best selling images online (on this subject) and go deeper, play, have a more creative, more personal approach to it, like extinguishing the volcano, girls with headset playing on top in the lava, the volcano top covered with a hardhat or handholding businessmen dancing around the base cheering and waving fire extinguishers."

puravida · « **Reply #8 on:** July 14, 2009, 14:33 »

Quote from: cevapcici on July 14, 2009, 11:31

"Erupting volcanoes are a very well covered subject in our data base or the subject of your image is too specific. We are looking for images that exceed the technical quality and creativity of the images already online. Please take a few minutes to browse through the best selling images online (on this subject) and go deeper, play, have a more creative, more personal approach to it, like extinguishing the volcano, girls with headset playing on top in the lava, the volcano top covered with a hardhat or handholding businessmen dancing around the base cheering and waving fire extinguishers."

rofl, you just kill me, cevapcici

2 additional warnings:
- make sure you get a IP release (headsets, extinguisher,etc),
- if you are going to depict a religious maiden sacrificial rite, some countries banned virgin sacrifice in volcanos a century ago

Aetherial · « **Reply #9 on:** July 15, 2009, 01:13 »

I think eruptions are generally rejected because of noise.

qwerty · « **Reply #10 on:** July 15, 2009, 02:31 »

Quote from: cevapcici on July 14, 2009, 11:31

Quote from: Perseus on July 14, 2009, 10:43
This is a snapshot (Image Deleted).

"Erupting volcanoes are a very well covered subject in our data base or the subject of your image is too specific. We are looking for images that exceed the technical quality and creativity of the images already online. Please take a few minutes to browse through the best selling images online (on this subject) and go deeper, play, have a more creative, more personal approach to it, like extinguishing the volcano, girls with headset playing on top in the lava, the volcano top covered with a hardhat or handholding businessmen dancing around the base cheering and waving fire extinguishers."

Don't forget the goldfish jumping into and out of the lava.

Clivia · « **Reply #11 on:** July 15, 2009, 08:26 »

You have got too many clouds. All the best stock pictures have a single fluffy white cloud in the sky.

puravida · « **Reply #12 on:** July 15, 2009, 08:48 »

Quote from: qwerty on July 15, 2009, 02:31

Quote from: cevapcici on July 14, 2009, 11:31
Quote from: Perseus on July 14, 2009, 10:43
This is a snapshot (Image Deleted).

"Erupting volcanoes are a very well covered subject in our data base or the subject of your image is too specific. We are looking for images that exceed the technical quality and creativity of the images already online. Please take a few minutes to browse through the best selling images online (on this subject) and go deeper, play, have a more creative, more personal approach to it, like extinguishing the volcano, girls with headset playing on top in the lava, the volcano top covered with a hardhat or handholding businessmen dancing around the base cheering and waving fire extinguishers."

Don't forget the goldfish jumping into and out of the lava.

rejects all.
reason: we have too many of these type of images, try to think out of the box.
suggestion: model taking the leak into the volcano

model release: not required for silhouette or partial lower body shots.
(note: some site may differ on MR requirement )

microstockinsider · « **Reply #13 on:** July 19, 2009, 23:32 »

We regret to inform you that we cannot accept your submission, entitled Erupting Volcano for addition to the library for the following reasons:

We found the lighting of your molten lava to be too harsh and contrasty. Technical aspects that can affect the overall quality of lighting are: flat/dull colors, blown-out highlights, harsh reflection, shadows or lens flares. These can all limit the usefulness of a file.

HughStoneIan · « **Reply #14 on:** July 20, 2009, 00:12 »

The execution of eruption contains stray areas that are either too molten or too solid.....(no resubmit).

Squat · « **Reply #15 on:** July 20, 2009, 09:06 »

Madeladinha, looks like you released a monster

But it's all good fun. I enjoy the funny responses you got.

My rejection reason is:

Although we find your photography excellent, you could improve this image if you had waited for the right lighting.

madelaide · « **Reply #16 on:** July 20, 2009, 16:19 »

I must say that at SP the response was very different. A lot of people question the image, whether it is a HDR or a montage and if so it should not have been posted in a "scientific" site (as if NASA images are not edited themselves). Ok, SP doesn't have site inspection, so people are less neurotic about it (although they are neurotic about ratings).

RacePhoto · « **Reply #17 on:** July 21, 2009, 00:00 »

I liked it, nice shot whether it's all one or a composite. Here's the agency review, which goes with the rest of them above. Probably the shadows in the front are "poor lighting"

Your image did not meet our technical qualifications.

The image contains one or more technical problems:

   * Blurry or out of focus
   * Over/Under exposure
   * Framing problem
   * Over or under saturated colors
   * Problems with contrast
   * Noise or Pixelation
   * Quality of routing
   * Interpolation problem

puravida · « **Reply #18 on:** July 21, 2009, 10:23 »

Quote from: RacePhoto on July 21, 2009, 00:00

I liked it, nice shot whether it's all one or a composite. Here's the agency review, which goes with the rest of them above. Probably the shadows in the front are "poor lighting"

Your image did not meet our technical qualifications.

The image contains one or more technical problems:

* Blurry or out of focus
* Over/Under exposure
* Framing problem
* Over or under saturated colors
* Problems with contrast
* Noise or Pixelation
* Quality of routing
* Interpolation problem

rofl, 3 cheers for racephoto.
i was wondering why no one brought up this over-encompassing mother of a rejection !!!

wowee zowee, beat me racephoto !

Snufkin · « **Reply #19 on:** July 23, 2009, 12:00 »

The following keywords used for this file do not appear to be fully relevant to the subject:

[volcano]

Please provide a set of simple, descriptive, focused keywords for this image before resubmitting.

RacePhoto · « **Reply #20 on:** July 28, 2009, 12:58 »

Quote from: Tom on July 23, 2009, 12:00

The following keywords used for this file do not appear to be fully relevant to the subject:

[volcano]

Please provide a set of simple, descriptive, focused keywords for this image before resubmitting.

Fishing, Boat, Electric, Light, Forrest, are acceptable?

Glad we have a classic thread going here.

Snufkin · « **Reply #21 on:** July 28, 2009, 13:34 »

Quote

Fishing, Boat, Electric, Light, Forrest, are acceptable?

If you are exclusive, then yes.

MicrostockGroup Sponsors

Author Topic: Astronomy Picture of the Day - Erupting Volcano Anak Krakatau (Read 5337 times)

madelaide

m@m

qwerty

Snufkin

m@m

puravida

willie

lurkertwo

puravida

Aetherial

qwerty

Clivia

puravida

microstockinsider

HughStoneIan

Squat

madelaide

RacePhoto

puravida

Snufkin

RacePhoto

Snufkin

Related Topics

Sponsors

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors