pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: Capitalism is the crisis  (Read 40579 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Tror

« on: July 04, 2013, 11:50 »
0
Enjoy :-)
Capitalism Is The Crisis (Full Movie)


« Reply #1 on: July 04, 2013, 16:27 »
0
Don't think I'm going to watch a film that long on that subject.  What's better than capitalism?  What's the next "ism" going to be?  They all seem to fail eventually and get replaced by something else but if that takes another 200 years, we might as well make the most of what we've got now.

dbvirago

« Reply #2 on: July 04, 2013, 16:42 »
+1
Actually, they all fail eventually and get replaced by.... capitalism.

« Reply #3 on: July 04, 2013, 20:49 »
+4
Actually, they all fail eventually and get replaced by.... capitalism.

Capitalism and the corporation is a fairly recent creation.  I have lived where the Corporation is King ( Tokyo) and where the Corporation is the devil ( Jungles of Ecuador)... I prefer the life style and the thinking of the later.

« Reply #4 on: July 04, 2013, 22:44 »
0
Surely capitalism has been the norm since at least the invention of money and probably since the invention of the concept of storing wealth in goods (such as grain). As soon as people can acquire capital, they want to use it to develop and protect the status that wealth confers.

And I can't be bothered to watch the film either. If it is an attack on capitalism then Tror should bear in mind that stock photography exists to serve one of the most quintessential capitalist activities of all - advertising - which is nothing more than investing capital to try to get people to give  you money for things that you probably don't really need. If you love being a stock photographer you can't hate capitalism.

shudderstok

« Reply #5 on: July 05, 2013, 01:25 »
+13
Surely capitalism has been the norm since at least the invention of money and probably since the invention of the concept of storing wealth in goods (such as grain). As soon as people can acquire capital, they want to use it to develop and protect the status that wealth confers.

And I can't be bothered to watch the film either. If it is an attack on capitalism then Tror should bear in mind that stock photography exists to serve one of the most quintessential capitalist activities of all - advertising - which is nothing more than investing capital to try to get people to give  you money for things that you probably don't really need. If you love being a stock photographer you can't hate capitalism.

true enough, but one can hate the sheer unadulterated greed these stock companies have in regards to making a profit at any cost - most notably to the detriment of the photographers who supply them with their "assets".

i support capitalism, but greed is another thing all together.

Tror

« Reply #6 on: July 05, 2013, 05:13 »
+6
At first, I do not like to mix up too many emotions in those objective themes. It is not about hate or love. It is about a subject. Second, this movie does not represent my personal opinion, but I think knowledge is power and in my humble experience it never hurts to look closer at a subject which pretty much dominates our world. Third, IMHO, capitalism is the ultima ratio at the moment, but the WAY it is done is destructive.

It seems to be pretty obvious that many people replying haven`T even watched the documentary and just try to judge it because of the title...what are you afraid of?

« Reply #7 on: July 05, 2013, 07:09 »
+3
And I can't be bothered to watch the film either. If it is an attack on capitalism then Tror should bear in mind that stock photography exists to serve one of the most quintessential capitalist activities 

Microstock is such a perfect example of Capitalism.    And this forum points it out perfectly.

We have one thread where the founder of Shutter Stock is a billionare.
We have many threads where people are complaining about not being paid enough.
Prue Capitalism.

But don't watch the film. It might make you think and we all know how bad thinking is....   ;D

Disclaimer.......I tried to watch the film, but I couldn't get past the production, but I am familiar with its themes.

« Reply #8 on: July 05, 2013, 07:47 »
+1
Capitalism has not ideology, that is only free market based on demand and supply!
So criminal is something other, sometimes unrecognizable, especially on free market ...

We can talk about criminal of high position but not about crisis in capitalism...
Capitalism gives opportunity for robbery, but as itself it is not generator of crisis.

« Reply #9 on: July 05, 2013, 07:54 »
+10
Capitalism = fine economic system
Vulture Capitalism = what we increasing have and not so fine

"The Revolution Will Not Be Televised" . . . . . . .  Gil Scott-Heron.
« Last Edit: July 05, 2013, 08:08 by etienjones »

Beppe Grillo

« Reply #10 on: July 05, 2013, 08:11 »
+3

The actual trend of capitalism is killing democracy, transforming these countries having a huge debt, but having the possibility to print money as they need and when they need, in dictatorships

« Reply #11 on: July 05, 2013, 09:07 »
0
Don't think I'm going to watch a film that long on that subject.  What's better than capitalism?  What's the next "ism" going to be?  They all seem to fail eventually and get replaced by something else but if that takes another 200 years, we might as well make the most of what we've got now.

Need to define "better" first. If we define it has "more efficient", than any economic system where access to goods doesn't happen through a market is "better" and more efficient. In fact, no company works internally using a market to mediate access to internal goods and services.
« Last Edit: July 05, 2013, 09:10 by Fran »

Ron

« Reply #12 on: July 05, 2013, 09:43 »
+1

The actual trend of capitalism is killing democracy, transforming these countries having a huge debt, but having the possibility to print money as they need and when they need, in dictatorships
You are describing the USA with your comment, intentionally or not, but the USA is not really a dictatorship, nor even close to it. Not defending their money printing shenanigans by the way.

« Reply #13 on: July 05, 2013, 14:49 »
0
Surely capitalism has been the norm since at least the invention of money and probably since the invention of the concept of storing wealth in goods (such as grain). As soon as people can acquire capital, they want to use it to develop and protect the status that wealth confers.

And I can't be bothered to watch the film either. If it is an attack on capitalism then Tror should bear in mind that stock photography exists to serve one of the most quintessential capitalist activities of all - advertising - which is nothing more than investing capital to try to get people to give  you money for things that you probably don't really need. If you love being a stock photographer you can't hate capitalism.

true enough, but one can hate the sheer unadulterated greed these stock companies have in regards to making a profit at any cost - most notably to the detriment of the photographers who supply them with their "assets".

i support capitalism, but greed is another thing all together.

Yes, I can run with that.

GRS - my normal error is overthinking, not lack of thinking, but I don't want to waste 90 minutes or whatever on something that sounds tedious, biased and predictable. If the OP would like to give a summary in 500 words of the point this film makes I will be happy to think about it.

« Reply #14 on: July 05, 2013, 16:54 »
0
I caught a bit of this programme and this 3 minute clip is worth watching.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p00z0yb2

Tror

« Reply #15 on: July 05, 2013, 20:54 »
0
Surely capitalism has been the norm since at least the invention of money and probably since the invention of the concept of storing wealth in goods (such as grain). As soon as people can acquire capital, they want to use it to develop and protect the status that wealth confers.

And I can't be bothered to watch the film either. If it is an attack on capitalism then Tror should bear in mind that stock photography exists to serve one of the most quintessential capitalist activities of all - advertising - which is nothing more than investing capital to try to get people to give  you money for things that you probably don't really need. If you love being a stock photographer you can't hate capitalism.

true enough, but one can hate the sheer unadulterated greed these stock companies have in regards to making a profit at any cost - most notably to the detriment of the photographers who supply them with their "assets".

i support capitalism, but greed is another thing all together.

Yes, I can run with that.

GRS - my normal error is overthinking, not lack of thinking, but I don't want to waste 90 minutes or whatever on something that sounds tedious, biased and predictable. If the OP would like to give a summary in 500 words of the point this film makes I will be happy to think about it.

Hi. Cool statement. But nevertheless I am too lazy to give as 500 word statement especially since the movie is nothing personal for me :-) . Maybe a lazy day you find time to watch documentaries like that or of the opposite direction and can develope upon. I hope you enjoy the day anyhow....
« Last Edit: July 05, 2013, 20:56 by Tror »

« Reply #16 on: July 05, 2013, 22:29 »
-2
If it is an attack on capitalism then Tror should bear in mind that stock photography exists to serve one of the most quintessential capitalist activities of all - advertising - which is nothing more than investing capital to try to get people to give  you money for things that you probably don't really need. If you love being a stock photographer you can't hate capitalism.

Sorry but you are wrong completely,,  if for example u u pre-advertising a Permaculture farm and its products in your photos , you are doing absolutely no favor to capitalism and its food propaganda, food is something that all of us still need and if its healthy produced in natural environment without use of pesticides and other s..t even better. And if u or me or someone third is promoting that trough the chain of capitalism he can use its positive methods to promote thing that can make it better.

You are involved in creation of market...you pick whats behind the lens when u press the shutter and any thematic can sell if the photo is good enough. And u stand better chances to make a good photo if u shoot what u like that when u shoot because u have to because u follow the needs of the market.



« Reply #17 on: July 06, 2013, 00:33 »
0
what are you afraid of?

I'm afraid of the amount of work that won't be done during the 1 1/2 hours that I spend watching!  ;D

Tror

« Reply #18 on: July 06, 2013, 07:51 »
0
what are you afraid of?

I'm afraid of the amount of work that won't be done during the 1 1/2 hours that I spend watching!  ;D

Lol, that regulary prevents me from sleeping :D

« Reply #19 on: July 06, 2013, 09:47 »
0
Lol, that regulary prevents me from sleeping :D

What is this "sleep" that you mention? I seem to recall hearing about it, but don't have personal experience with it...   ;)

« Reply #20 on: July 06, 2013, 10:28 »
-1
If it is an attack on capitalism then Tror should bear in mind that stock photography exists to serve one of the most quintessential capitalist activities of all - advertising - which is nothing more than investing capital to try to get people to give  you money for things that you probably don't really need. If you love being a stock photographer you can't hate capitalism.

Sorry but you are wrong completely,,  if for example u u pre-advertising a Permaculture farm and its products in your photos , you are doing absolutely no favor to capitalism and its food propaganda, food is something that all of us still need and if its healthy produced in natural environment without use of pesticides and other s..t even better. And if u or me or someone third is promoting that trough the chain of capitalism he can use its positive methods to promote thing that can make it better.

You are involved in creation of market...you pick whats behind the lens when u press the shutter and any thematic can sell if the photo is good enough. And u stand better chances to make a good photo if u shoot what u like that when u shoot because u have to because u follow the needs of the market.

And who says your lovely sustainable crops shot won't appear on a Monsanto advert for round-up ready?  Or maybe it will be used by Hilton Hotels to encourage tourists to buy hotel-based environmental tours. You are feeding images to the advertising industry with no control over usage and the overwhelming objective of advertisers is to boost their business profits. 

Like it or not, you are feeding and profiting from the capitalist system.

« Reply #21 on: July 06, 2013, 11:00 »
+4

Like it or not, you are feeding and profiting from the capitalist system.

So we have to be outside a system to critique it? Only non-istockers allowed to talk about what they are doing?

Personally I don't see problems with Capitalism, but I see many problems with corporations and how they behave.  What is needed is a way to bring them under control...though I don't have any idea about how to accomplish this.

Tror

« Reply #22 on: July 06, 2013, 11:32 »
+2

Like it or not, you are feeding and profiting from the capitalist system.

So we have to be outside a system to critique it? Only non-istockers allowed to talk about what they are doing?

Personally I don't see problems with Capitalism, but I see many problems with corporations and how they behave.  What is needed is a way to bring them under control...though I don't have any idea about how to accomplish this.


I completely agree. Any system can be abused. And at the moment capitalism is a abused system. Criticism and being aware of the critical attributes is a first step in curing it.

« Reply #23 on: July 06, 2013, 12:41 »
0

Like it or not, you are feeding and profiting from the capitalist system.

So we have to be outside a system to critique it? Only non-istockers allowed to talk about what they are doing?

Personally I don't see problems with Capitalism, but I see many problems with corporations and how they behave.  What is needed is a way to bring them under control...though I don't have any idea about how to accomplish this.


I completely agree. Any system can be abused. And at the moment capitalism is a abused system. Criticism and being aware of the critical attributes is a first step in curing it.

And what's all that got to do with Lizard telling me I'm wrong to say that stock photography is inherently linked with capitalism? Who said anything about not critiquing things, and who decided that when I say "capitalism" I am refering to corporate greed? The title of the thread is "capitalism is the crisis" not "corporatism is the crisis".

PS: I just watched the first 13 minutes of that film and I was right - it is just a list of problems and complaints we all know about, with "consumerism" - which is what stock is there to help promote - listed among them. It's also got some of  the usual contradictions that such lists throw up - complaining that we consume too much, and that people haven't got jobs; complaining about depressions caused by oil supply curbs and about damage to nature caused by oil extraction.  If the film had any credible solution to offer to all the ills of the world I guess they would have trailed that at the beginning - or maybe the reference to "revolution" was that, holding out all the joys of the current Syrian experience.

I'm like everyone else - a Green campaigner through and through, as long as being Green doesn't make me poor.
« Last Edit: July 06, 2013, 13:11 by BaldricksTrousers »

« Reply #24 on: July 06, 2013, 13:48 »
+1
If it is an attack on capitalism then Tror should bear in mind that stock photography exists to serve one of the most quintessential capitalist activities of all - advertising - which is nothing more than investing capital to try to get people to give  you money for things that you probably don't really need. If you love being a stock photographer you can't hate capitalism.

Sorry but you are wrong completely,,  if for example u u pre-advertising a Permaculture farm and its products in your photos , you are doing absolutely no favor to capitalism and its food propaganda, food is something that all of us still need and if its healthy produced in natural environment without use of pesticides and other s..t even better. And if u or me or someone third is promoting that trough the chain of capitalism he can use its positive methods to promote thing that can make it better.

You are involved in creation of market...you pick whats behind the lens when u press the shutter and any thematic can sell if the photo is good enough. And u stand better chances to make a good photo if u shoot what u like that when u shoot because u have to because u follow the needs of the market.

And who says your lovely sustainable crops shot won't appear on a Monsanto advert for round-up ready? Or maybe it will be used by Hilton Hotels to encourage tourists to buy hotel-based environmental tours. You are feeding images to the advertising industry with no control over usage and the overwhelming objective of advertisers is to boost their business profits. 

Like it or not, you are feeding and profiting from the capitalist system.

So what makes u think  that one of the people on those tours will hear the seminar about what they are eating and what are the consequences of that and that one of those people will start buying food only from people growing it naturally as nature intended ?

Or that one of those people wont stop eating hormone and antibiotic  filled semi-animals and start to buy meat from people who treat animals in human way or even better become vegetarian ?

Now if one case happens try to calculate how much money is redirected outside corporatism to people who accually do something during the life of that man.

Or why are u certain that that one person even if he got there by Hilton or Park Plaza or whoever took him there wont share his experience and involve few friends in more natural way of life that is complete opposite of capitalistic propaganda especially about food and water ?

What makes u think a photo of a man messing with your food pesticides and other craps dressed up like he is going to space cannot make a difference for someone.


Yes again, u were and are completely wrong, even if your ego is hurt and if u try to invent any argument corporate capitalism lacks humanity and parts of that can surely be exposed inside stock photography even if its highly connected to capitalism as u rightfully claim.





 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
9 Replies
4914 Views
Last post October 27, 2008, 13:04
by RacePhoto
74 Replies
23880 Views
Last post June 02, 2009, 01:27
by leaf
68 Replies
19112 Views
Last post June 07, 2011, 03:48
by ShadySue
9 Replies
3529 Views
Last post October 07, 2015, 01:25
by john_woodcock
11 Replies
12504 Views
Last post April 09, 2020, 07:59
by Bauman

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors