MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: Journalists Going Micro Also  (Read 3971 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

RacePhoto

« on: January 08, 2010, 21:18 »
0
Read the article. We've already seen some citizen journalist sites, but look at this!

http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/la-et-onthemedia6-2010jan06,0,3250617,full.column

The list of freelance writing gigs on Craigslist goes on and on.

Trails.com will pay $15 for articles about the outdoors. Livestrong.com wants 500-word pieces on health for $30, or less. In this mix, the 16 cents a word offered by Green Business Quarterly ends up sounding almost bounteous, amounting to more than $100 per submission.

Other publishers pitch the grand opportunities they provide to "extend your personal brand" or to "showcase your work, influence others." That means working for nothing, just like the sailing magazine that offers its next editor-writer not a single doubloon but, instead, the opportunity to "participate in regattas all over the country."


Sound familiar?


« Reply #1 on: January 09, 2010, 04:34 »
0
Isn't Globalization wonderful!  If you want to put it into historical context then the free market idea of Adam Smith is the real winner . . .  what we have here is the peasants fighting for the last wild boar in the King's forest . . . .  and every hungry peasant is invited.

« Reply #2 on: January 09, 2010, 07:19 »
0
It's not just about hungry peasants, but also about showing people you are a photographer, a journalist, whatever.  People would do that even for free.

On a side note: I used to write travel reports about my trips, no money-making intended at all.  Could I make money with them?  Possibly yes, especially these days (Googe ads and such), but this was only about sharing experiences, like the internet used to be.  

RacePhoto

« Reply #3 on: January 11, 2010, 18:12 »
0
Isn't Globalization wonderful!  If you want to put it into historical context then the free market idea of Adam Smith is the real winner . . .  what we have here is the peasants fighting for the last wild boar in the King's forest . . . .  and every hungry peasant is invited.

I like the analogy which works better in European cultural terms. Since the USA never had Kings, Dukes, Lords, preserves or only some elite small groups who could hunt or fish in many places, it falls short of the modern world as it is now. I still like it. :)

Supply and demand, that's what it's all about: The model of supply and demand predicts that for given supply and demand curves, price and quantity will stabilize at the price that makes quantity supplied equal to quantity demanded.

We have a world abundance of creative people with the tools to produce the products. (photos, writings, whatever...) Distribution is not limited by political boundaries. The trade unions and limits to publication have been broken down. You don't need to physically print things anymore to distribute them. You don't have to have a degree or go through an internship or apprenticeship, to get your work recognized.

I'd say the biggest factors to all of this change is the electronic world we live in. Specifically digital equipment that's widely available to anyone with moderate means, and the Internet. That would be Supply, Distribution and Demand.

I know I'm old but imagine when some of you young whipper-snappers (whatever that is) will be telling your kids about the old days, when you got magazines in the mail and you could hold them in your hands. When newspapers were printed on paper and had many secondary uses, like lining the bottom of the bird cage, crumpling up for packing material or wrapping fish. Or are those already primary uses?

I grew up in the age of multiple newspapers, daily morning and evening, plus some weekly. Someone might get a comment printed in a letters column, but there was no public voice.

Now we can have ones own blog or website and write to the world, about anything we please. Meanwhile the newspapers are going extinct. Yeah "The Times They are a-changin'" (Bob Dylan)
« Last Edit: January 11, 2010, 18:24 by RacePhoto »

« Reply #4 on: January 12, 2010, 12:29 »
0
i can see the redundance of newsprint, Race,
but like it or not, i still prefer my hardcopy of VOGUE.
and based on the consensus of the models i work with, all young and the current generation, they too prefer to read their copy of Vogue . not one of them has a web subscription.

i am old like you, but not all young people like the idea of web media.

many things change but some things keep coming back.
and others don't change at all. eg. comics, vinyls, ... as much as the producers want to push
them to web media , many of these young people who were born after the vinyl and hard copy generation are still going back to collect the old stuff.
the move to web media does not mean the users want them. only the makers want them because it increases their net profit. much like subs that micro stock sites adore , which is the bane to contributors.  just because it's prevalent does not mean people approve of it.
some times they have no choice. or more so, they have no say in this matter of transition .  much like many of my young photographic students tell me they deplore digital media, and prefer shooting with the old mamiya 2 1/4 even though it's so difficult finding the wide choice of films like we had in our times of being newbie in photography.

 i think the tabloids , newspaper,etc.. can be replaced. they're all mush anyway.
 i will miss  them  only that i won't have them to use to clean up my kitty litter.

but magazines like Vogue, i don't think too many would prefer to see them on the monitor. many photographers and models still want the "organic" feel of it.
« Last Edit: January 12, 2010, 12:41 by PERSEUS »

« Reply #5 on: January 12, 2010, 12:36 »
0
double post
« Last Edit: January 12, 2010, 12:41 by PERSEUS »

RacePhoto

« Reply #6 on: January 12, 2010, 18:10 »
0
I didn't say I don't like magazines. Heck I still shop books at Goodwill because I like them, but some day, just like vinyl records and tapes, we are going to be using cards and chips. We won't even have CDs and DVDs. Paper? What's that.

Someone just loaned be the complete Mad Magazine on 7 CDs, 1952-1998. 50MB! It could fit onto a small thumb drive.

AVI movies you can fit onto a 1G card. I recorded a race off broadcast to watch later, it's 1.3GB and acceptable viewing. It won't be long before a full length movie will be available on a 4GB chip, high quality, wide screen, HiFi digital sound! Anyone watch their silent 8mm film home movies lately?  ;) I have some double 8 cameras... do they make film for them anymore? (Super-8 must be long gone)

So the question is, where will be get the paper to line bird cages, pack boxes, make paper mache masks or wrap dead fish? No more free supply! I see a marketing opportunity coming of age. Blank, clean newsprint.  ;D

« Reply #7 on: January 12, 2010, 19:53 »
0
So the question is, where will be get the paper to line bird cages, pack boxes, make paper mache masks or wrap dead fish? No more free supply! I see a marketing opportunity coming of age. Blank, clean newsprint.  ;D


hey that sounds like a great business venture, Race. you don't even need to produce the clean newsprint, just gather them from the third world countries who would still be using newsprint.
let's get into this business together. maybe we'll get so filthy (bad pun) rich with this joint venture, we won't need to be micro stock photographers . hell ,
you could even use the profits to start your own editorial only micro stock site.
me? i can retire to lay on the beach in some Greek island, drink my Guinness.
 ;D ;D ;D
« Last Edit: January 12, 2010, 20:01 by PERSEUS »

RacePhoto

« Reply #8 on: January 12, 2010, 22:18 »
0
So the question is, where will be get the paper to line bird cages, pack boxes, make paper mache masks or wrap dead fish? No more free supply! I see a marketing opportunity coming of age. Blank, clean newsprint.  ;D


hey that sounds like a great business venture, Race. you don't even need to produce the clean newsprint, just gather them from the third world countries who would still be using newsprint.
let's get into this business together. maybe we'll get so filthy (bad pun) rich with this joint venture, we won't need to be micro stock photographers . hell ,
you could even use the profits to start your own editorial only micro stock site.
me? i can retire to lay on the beach in some Greek island, drink my Guinness.
 ;D ;D ;D

Makes me wonder about recycled newspaper and those bins with nothing in them. "Newspaper only" :)


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
9 Replies
5177 Views
Last post March 08, 2007, 04:06
by CJPhoto
14 Replies
6977 Views
Last post September 22, 2016, 06:19
by cathyslife
0 Replies
3045 Views
Last post January 21, 2008, 15:18
by Read_My_Rights
2 Replies
3229 Views
Last post January 29, 2008, 12:09
by vonkara
0 Replies
4199 Views
Last post February 27, 2014, 13:05
by jsmith

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors