MicrostockGroup
Microstock Photography Forum - General => Off Topic => Topic started by: madelaide on August 22, 2009, 15:36
-
http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/humanbody/sleep/tmt/ (http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/humanbody/sleep/tmt/)
-
haha just confirmed what I've always know. I have a shocking memory. Fun though, thanks for posting.
Recognition score
( if you saw it )
Your score: 50%
Average score: 92%
This is a measure of your ability to remember the photos you've seen, regardless of the part in which you saw them. From all 24 photos shown in Parts 1 & 2, you recognised: 12 photo(s).
Temporal memory score
( when you saw it )
Your score: 66%
Average score: 68%
-
Hey Komar, I beat you!
Recognition: 75%
Temporal: 77%
Thanks, Madelaide, for the welcome break from keywording!
Regards, David.
-
Hmmm
95% recognition
56% temporal
???
That's a huge difference!
-
Hmmm
95% recognition
56% temporal
???
That's a huge difference!
Maybe you often recognise people, but you often can't place where you know them from :)
-
Hmmm
95% recognition
56% temporal
???
That's a huge difference!
Maybe you often recognise people, but you often can't place where you know them from :)
That's true, especially if I see them in a different context.
-
My results are exactly like ShadySue's:
95% recognition
56% temporal
And I know that I have this problem. I often know that I saw someone's face before, but I don't know where I saw it. :D
Great test! Thanks Adelaide!
-
Recognition score
( if you saw it )
Your score: 70%
Average score: 92%
Temporal memory score
( when you saw it )
Your score: 94%
Average score: 68%
These photos were in neither section:
1 false positive
I only knew 70% of the images I had seen, but at least 94% were in the right section.
David ;D
-
Recognition score
( if you saw it )
Your score: 75%
Average score: 92%
Temporal memory score
( when you saw it )
Your score: 72%
Average score: 68%
In the section above you made 0 "false positive(s)". That is, thinking you remembered seeing the photo when you hadn't seen it before. Average false positive score is 1-3.
That was fun. I didn't claim to have seen faces that I hadn't, however I did deny having seen quite a few faces that I actually had seen ;D
-
I didn't take note of my results, but I remember I had 100% in seen vs not seen. I think I picked 3-4 from the wrong series. I didn't take the 5min breaks. I believe the way I played - trying to tag each image with some ethnicity or some special characteristic - help me in my results.
It isn't much different from real life. I often find people whose face is known (and they know me), but I have no idea of their names or where I know them from (unless I make some association with some facial characteristic or their behavior). ;D
-
i did 95% for the recognition part
and 91% for the temporal.
not as bad as i would thought
-
Thanks for posting this it was fun to do but the results were not as good as I expected:)
Recognition score
( if you saw it )
Your score: 83% Average score: 92%
Temporal memory score
( when you saw it )
Your score: 65% Average score: 68%
-
fun game :)
Recognition score : 100%
Temporal memory score : 95%
-
recognition - 100%
temporal - 95%
-
95% Recognition
91% Temporal Memory
I expected to do OK on this :-)
-
Neat little test, thanks for posting :D
100% recognition, temporal 83%...
-
Recogition - 87%
Temporal - 95%
Not bad on 5 hours sleep out of the last 24!
Time for bed - goodnight all!
Oldhand
-
95 (23 of 24)/ 86% Temporal and I know which one I missed (I think I know?) the second from the last, that I couldn't decide if I saw it or not.
Recognizing multi-ethnic faces could throw some people more than others.
-
91% and 68% for me. I had one false positive. Very interesting and fun! :)