MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: Man Jailed for 'Trolling'  (Read 2608 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rubyroo

« on: September 13, 2011, 16:55 »
0


nruboc

« Reply #1 on: September 13, 2011, 18:47 »
0
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-berkshire-14894576


Trolling should not be a crime in this chap's case, as he appears to look like a troll.

« Reply #2 on: September 13, 2011, 19:27 »
0
He appears to have some sort of disability himself.

lthn

    This user is banned.
« Reply #3 on: September 14, 2011, 03:02 »
0
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-berkshire-14894576


Trolling should not be a crime in this chap's case, as he appears to look like a troll.


He's more like a gnome. : ) Do I get jailed now? Dumbdo titles btw, almost makes it sound like a free-speech issue... how about slander, defamation?

rubyroo

« Reply #4 on: September 14, 2011, 03:42 »
0
Yes, well, given the sensitiviity of the subject, I thought it best just to echo the title used in the original article.   But I agree this is not your average 'trolling' episode.  

Now that a line has been drawn, it'll be interesting to see whether 'netiquette' returns to greater prominence as an issue.  I remember in the early days of the Web - when far fewer people were online - users were much more concerned about netiquette, and largely self-policed.

Of course there's a whole minefield here regarding a medical condition that renders a personal unable to judge another's reaction - but I don't know enough about Aspergers, or degrees of Aspergers to get into that.  I was more interested in the ripples that might emanate from this event.

ETA:  I'm unsure if this story will seem less significant outside of the UK - but we've recently had people imprisoned for their part in encouraging riots via the Internet, and so the legal response to matters of online communication feel very much the 'topic du jour' just now. 
« Last Edit: September 14, 2011, 04:30 by rubyroo »

digitalexpressionimages

« Reply #5 on: September 15, 2011, 09:40 »
0
The old term "sticks and stones" comes to mind. Should it really be illegal to be an a$$hole? Freedom of speech is now restricted to only nice things? The slippery slope began a while ago and now it's starting to rain. (Makes the slope slipperier to anyone who missed the reference).

I can see the day when speaking your mind is an extreme sport. Don't look anyone in the eye (assuming not all interaction is done via internet by then), no physical contact etc.etc. And they think the suicide rate is high now.

Maybe instead we should develop thicker skins. More tolerance for the unpleasant. Funny how we try to become more tolerant and end up being less tolerant for things we don't like.


 

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors