Author Topic: This should settle some different opinions (Read 142436 times)

stoker2014 · « **Reply #2150 on:** January 14, 2024, 05:06 »

In its advertising strategy in Ukraine, the PepsiCo company forbade mentioning the war.

This is reported by the global coalition of public organizations B4Ukraine.

In the fall of 2023, during the search for a new PR agency in Ukraine, requirements were set, according to which references to the war in PepsiCo's advertising activities were prohibited, namely:
Mention of war, hostilities, aggression, military personnel, Armed Forces; support for Ukraine or the Ukrainian army; negative connotations, which creates a feeling of "danger".

stoker2014 · « **Reply #2151 on:** January 14, 2024, 05:10 »

Dnipro We remember...
A year ago, on January 14, Russian bast.ards and Na.zis hit a residential building with an X-22 missile.
46 people were killed.

https://t.me/operativnoZSU/132018

Big Toe · « **Reply #2152 on:** January 14, 2024, 05:56 »

Quote from: zastavkin on January 14, 2024, 01:27

You know what happens in the modern “democratic World” when you criticize government of the country in which you live.

Nothing bad happens to people in the democratic world to people who criticize their government.

Then again, Russia isn't part of the democratic world, so you wouldn't know about that.

Quote from: zastavkin on January 14, 2024, 01:27

The death of Gonzalo López is another example of this.

Do you mean this guy:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gonzalo_Lopez

He was killed in a shoot out with the police because he opened fire with an AR-15–style rifle on the police officers trying to arrest him, having murdered five people, including three children, earlier the same day.

So, no, he is not really an example of what happens when you criticize your government in the democratic world.

RalfLiebhold · « **Reply #2153 on:** January 14, 2024, 05:57 »

Quote from: stoker2014 on January 14, 2024, 05:03

Pepsi helped russia to kill 13,000 Ukrainians.

Since the beginning of the russian invasion, Pepsi continued its operations in russia. As a result, PepsiCo’s net profit increased by a 333% to $525 million last year and the company paid $115 million in taxes to the Kremlin.

To put it in perspective, $115 million will allow russia to produce 200,000 shells. Artillery is responsible for about 75% of casualties, with roughly 15 shells per kill. So, Pepsi helped russia to kill 13,000 Ukrainians.

Literally, Pepsi is sponsoring russian war crimes. It has already been added to the list of international sponsors of war. But we need more!

Here are some practical steps:
1. Share this post with your friends and let them know about the moral bankruptcy of Pepsi.
2. Go to PepsiCo page and leave a comment reminding them that they are sponsoring war crimes.
3. Stop buying their products, they are not good for you anyway. But if you cannot live without soda, then switch to Coca-Cola.
4. Stop working for Pepsi. I actually had several connections on LinkedIn who worked for Pepsi. I removed them, because I cannot be connected to people who tangentially enable genocide against my family and friends.

https://twitter.com/rshereme/status/1746232199836500056

Glory to Ukraine!

Here, too, not everything is always black and white.

There is a German supermarket chain GLOBUS that is still active in Russia. As I am a customer in this store, I wrote to the management and, to my surprise, received a personalized reply very quickly.

On the one hand, they felt responsible for the 10,000 employees and for the basic food supply for the population.
More importantly, however, if they were to pull out, there would be a forced sale and the Russian state would take considerable assets. The financial gain for the Russian state would be greater than the current income.

Even if I don't completely share their opinion, I can understand their point of view.

I don't know whether the situation is comparable for Pepsico.

stoker2014 · « **Reply #2154 on:** January 14, 2024, 08:36 »

This is what Russian slaves, orcs and zombies look like. And there are 80-90% of such Russians in russia.

Big Toe · « **Reply #2155 on:** January 14, 2024, 09:10 »

Quote from: stoker2014 on January 14, 2024, 08:36

This is what Russian slaves, orcs and zombies look like. And there are 80-90% of such Russians in russia.

There is no orc in this picture. Haven't you watched Lord Of The Rings? You seem to be unaware how orcs look like.

Wilm · « **Reply #2156 on:** January 14, 2024, 09:22 »

Quote from: stoker2014 on January 14, 2024, 08:36

This is what Russian slaves, orcs and zombies look like. And there are 80-90% of such Russians in russia.

Exactly! Like 80-90% of the Ukrainians own expensive SUVs. The same level of stereotypical thinking.

Wilm · « **Reply #2157 on:** January 14, 2024, 09:29 »

Oh! Lev Rubinstein didn't fall out of the window. It wasn't a plane crash either. This time it was a traffic accident.

stoker2014 · « **Reply #2158 on:** January 14, 2024, 14:07 »

A document called the Proposed Victory Plan for Ukraine has been published on the website of the US Congress.

It was signed by the heads of three key committees of the House of Representatives and influential members of the Republican Party. They sharply criticize the Joe Biden administration for insufficient military support for Ukraine and offer to provide the Ukrainian Armed Forces with critical weapons.

The plan was signed by the heads of the Committees on Foreign Affairs (Michael McCaul), Armed Services (Mike Rogers) and Intelligence (Mike Turner). The majority in the House of Representatives belongs to Republicans.

The document sharply criticizes the administration of President Joe Biden for insufficient and inconsistent military support for Ukraine and demands decisive action from him. As the authors note, Biden's hesitation to provide Ukraine with critical weapons delayed the Ukrainian victory. In their opinion, Ukraine needs to be provided with the longest-range variant of ATACMS, F-16 aircraft and sufficient numbers of cluster munitions, artillery, air defense systems and armored vehicles to change the situation on the battlefield. Delay leads to loss of lives of Ukrainians and money of American taxpayers. The authors point to the need to strengthen sanctions against the Putin regime and transfer $300 billion of frozen Russian sovereign assets to Ukraine.

This document was agreed upon by Speaker of the House of Representatives Mike Johnson.

https://foreignaffairs.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Proposed-Plan-for-Victory-in-Ukraine.pdf

stoker2014 · « **Reply #2159 on:** January 14, 2024, 14:12 »

So this is what I write about all the time. Biden is a friend of putin and Russian Na/zis. The Russian attack on Ukraine was always approved by Democratic presidents. The first is Obama, the second is Biden. Now Biden is helping putin win the elections in russia, in return Biden expects help from putin in the US elections.

Biden's place in the electric chair!
Fuck the Democrats!

stoker2014 · « **Reply #2160 on:** January 14, 2024, 14:18 »

"Plan for victory in Ukraine": US Republicans set out their vision for US role in defeating Russia.

The US Foreign Affairs Committee, House Armed Services Committee, and House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, all of which are chaired by Republicans, have issued a joint document in which they criticise President Joe Biden’s administration for its lack of assistance to Ukraine and demand decisive actions in this regard.

Details: The document, entitled the "Proposed Plan for Victory in Ukraine", was signed by Chairman Michael McCaul of the Foreign Affairs Committee, Chairman Mike Rogers of the House Armed Services Committee, and Chairman Mike Turner of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. It was drafted in late 2023 but has only now started to stir discussions among relevant stakeholders.

The plan’s cover shows a photo of Russian President Vladimir Putin standing alongside Chinese President Xi Jinping, Ali Khamenei, Supreme Leader of Iran, and the self-proclaimed Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko.

The plan is intended to address critical issues in relation to the US and its allies’ support for Ukraine and to set out a victory plan in which Ukraine wins and Russia loses.

The plan contains five sections: The Threat, Proposed Plan for Victory, Oversight, Burden Sharing, and Timeline of Biden’s Deadly Delays in Sending Weapons to Ukraine.

The Foreign Affairs Committee press release stated that Russia and an alliance consisting of China, Iran, Iran’s proxies (like Hamas and Hezbollah), and North Korea, are "working together to undermine American interests around the world". "Their goal is to diminish the US economy, fracture key alliances, and establish a new world order of totalitarianism. The United States has not faced a more dangerous array of adversaries since World War II," the press release said.

The authors of the report said in the press release that the US Congress has a "responsibility to defend freedom from the likes of Russia, China, and Iran. Many of you have questioned why we should support Ukraine, and this report will not only address your questions but will provide you with the information to inform others, especially our constituencies, why our support is needed."

"Biden’s mantra of supporting Ukraine ‘for as long as it takes’ is a losing strategy," the report itself says.

"Instead, House Republicans believe President Biden should present a credible plan for victory and arm Ukraine with the weapons it needs to win as soon as possible," the report continues.

"Since the first day of the war, Biden’s debilitating hesitation to provide critical weapons to Ukraine has delayed a Ukrainian victory," the report also says. Ukraine needs the longest-range variant of ATACMS (300 km, not the 160 km Ukraine was given), F-16 fighters, and sufficient quantities of cluster munitions, artillery, air defences, and armour "to make a difference on the battlefield". "This delay is costing Ukrainian lives and the American taxpayer," the report stresses.

The authors of the report believe that Ukraine’s path to victory requires "(1) providing critical weapons to Ukraine at the speed of relevance, (2) tightening sanctions on the Putin regime, and (3) transferring frozen Russian sovereign assets to Ukraine."

The report stresses the importance of oversight over the US aid, though it admits that the countless checks conducted to date have not detected any significant violations.

"Defeating Putin in Ukraine now will prevent a Russian invasion of a NATO ally, which would be immeasurably more costly in terms of American blood and treasure," the report says.

"As a percentage of GDP, the US ranks just 30th in total assistance to Ukraine, with Poland, the Baltic states, the UK, Norway, and others contributing more in terms of this metric. In terms of security assistance by GDP, the US ranks 14th," the report notes.

Support for Ukraine is not "charity", the press release added.

"After President Biden’s disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan, supporting Ukraine to defeat Putin’s invading forces is critical to restoring American deterrence in Europe, the Middle East, and the Indo-Pacific," the press release said.

The Proposed Plan for Victory in Ukraine "will ensure that Ukraine is able to make the needed advances on the battlefield to force Putin to the negotiating table," the press release promised.

https://foreignaffairs.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Proposed-Plan-for-Victory-in-Ukraine.pdf

stoker2014 · « **Reply #2161 on:** January 14, 2024, 14:26 »

I recommend everyone read this document from the Republicans.
https://foreignaffairs.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Proposed-Plan-for-Victory-in-Ukraine.pdf

Democratic Trolls Don't Need to Read.

"Biden is mishandling the worst war in Europe since World War II. His weakness failed to deter Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, continues to prolong the war, and risks inviting further aggression from America’s adversaries.
Biden did not impose a single significant sanction on Russia as it amassed troops around Ukraine in the lead-up to the invasion, nor did he provide significant military assistance during those critical months. In fact, he rolled-back and failed to enforce Trump-era sanctions on key Kremlin projects such as Nord Stream 2. This weakness forfeited the last opportunity to deter Russia and prevent this costly war.
It is no coincidence that Russia invaded Ukraine a mere six months after Biden’s. Shameful surrender to the Taliban and humiliating withdrawal from Afghanistan. Putin sensed American weakness and believed he could seize Ukraine without a significant response from the West. "

+100

Biden and the Democrats are criminals just like the Russians.

Wilm · « **Reply #2162 on:** January 14, 2024, 18:03 »

Quote from: stoker2014 on January 14, 2024, 14:12

Biden's place in the electric chair!

Wow! That's a great statement!

That sounds like: "All those who write here in the forum about the theoretical progress of US politics instead of defending Ukraine with a gun in their hand should go to the electric chair".

Will you start by going to the electric chair?

Do you know how democracy works?

stoker2014 · « **Reply #2163 on:** January 15, 2024, 06:35 »

The Ukrainian Air Force has destroyed Russia's A-50 early warning and control aircraft and Il-22 airborne command post and electronic intelligence aircraft.

Glory to Ukraine!
____

Reference: The A-50 aircraft is an airborne early warning and control (AWACS) platform designed for monitoring targets in the air, on the ground, and at sea, and for guiding fighter aircraft toward them.

The Russian Aerospace Forces have nine such aircraft at their disposal. Each aircraft is serviced by 19 personnel (5 pilots, 11 radio engineers, and 3 technical engineers) and costs US$330 million.

The Il-22M is an airborne command post based on the Il-18 airliner that helps control troops during hostilities.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z5R4VC4xmqw

stoker2014 · « **Reply #2164 on:** January 15, 2024, 10:11 »

https://foreignaffairs.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Proposed-Plan-for-Victory-in-Ukraine.pdf

All our adversaries are watching. If Biden can’t stop the Taliban, Iran and its proxies, or Putin, how will he deter Xi Jinping?
Biden is indirectly funding both sides of this war through his disastrous Iran policy. Multi-billion-dollar ransom payments to the Ayatollah and sanctions relief worth far greater have, for example, allowed Iran to build and transfer hundreds of drones to Russia.

+100
Biden and the Democrats are evil and political criminals!

stoker2014 · « **Reply #2165 on:** January 15, 2024, 13:35 »

Germany is preparing for war with the Russians as early as February 2024.

The German newspaper Bild has stated that the Bundeswehr (German Armed Forces) have been preparing for a hybrid Russian attack on NATO's eastern flank that may take place in February 2024.

Source: Bild with reference to a secret Bundeswehr document

Details: Bild noted that, according to the document, escalation between NATO and russia may take place as early as February 2024.

In a classified document (Top Secret – For Official Use Only), the German Federal Ministry of Defence outlines a potential "Path to Conflict" between russia and NATO is detailed. The actions of russia and the West are described month by month, culminating in the deployment of hundreds of thousands of NATO troops and the inevitable onset of war in the summer of 2025.

Bild outlines the scenario from the document but refrains from disclosing all the information regarding the size and movement of NATO forces due to security considerations.

The Bundeswehr's scenario, Alliance Defence 2025, begins in February 2024. Russia initiates another wave of mobilisation and conscripts an additional 200,000 individuals into the army. After that, the Kremlin launches a spring offensive in Ukraine, pushing the Ukrainian army back by June.

Russia's at first covert and then increasingly overt attack on the West begins in July. Cyber attacks and other forms of hybrid warfare are anticipated, primarily in the Baltic states. Clashes occur, which russia uses as an excuse to initiate large-scale military exercises on its territory and in Belarus.

According to the scenario, this situation could escalate in October if russia deploys troops and medium-range missiles to Kaliningrad. From December 2024, an artificially induced "border conflict" and "clashes with numerous casualties" unfold in the vicinity of the Suwałki Gap (Suwalki Corridor).

At a moment when the United States may be without a leader for several weeks after the elections, russia, with the support of Belarus, repeats the 2014 invasion of Ukraine but on NATO territory. In May 2025, NATO decides on containment measures, and on D-Day, NATO deploys 300,000 military personnel to the eastern flank, including 30,000 soldiers from the Bundeswehr.

The scenario ends 30 days after D-Day. Whether NATO will restrain Russia remains an open question.
________
As long as the US is led by cowardly Democrats, the Russians can launch an offensive against EU countries.
The Russians also see power shifting to the Republicans in 2025. Therefore, only this year the Russians can quickly occupy the maximum number of EU countries.

stoker2014 · « **Reply #2166 on:** January 15, 2024, 13:36 »

Does Joe Biden actually want Ukraine to win?

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/nc14lawson-0f2ptrcc0

Biden! Resign or shoot yourself!

RalfLiebhold · « **Reply #2167 on:** January 15, 2024, 14:30 »

Quote from: stoker2014 on January 15, 2024, 13:35

Germany is preparing for war with the Russians as early as February 2024.

The German newspaper Bild has stated that the Bundeswehr (German Armed Forces) have been preparing for a hybrid Russian attack on NATO's eastern flank that may take place in February 2024.

Source: Bild with reference to a secret Bundeswehr document

Details: Bild noted that, according to the document, escalation between NATO and russia may take place as early as February 2024.

In a classified document (Top Secret – For Official Use Only), the German Federal Ministry of Defence outlines a potential "Path to Conflict" between russia and NATO is detailed. The actions of russia and the West are described month by month, culminating in the deployment of hundreds of thousands of NATO troops and the inevitable onset of war in the summer of 2025.

Bild outlines the scenario from the document but refrains from disclosing all the information regarding the size and movement of NATO forces due to security considerations.

The Bundeswehr's scenario, Alliance Defence 2025, begins in February 2024. Russia initiates another wave of mobilisation and conscripts an additional 200,000 individuals into the army. After that, the Kremlin launches a spring offensive in Ukraine, pushing the Ukrainian army back by June.

Russia's at first covert and then increasingly overt attack on the West begins in July. Cyber attacks and other forms of hybrid warfare are anticipated, primarily in the Baltic states. Clashes occur, which russia uses as an excuse to initiate large-scale military exercises on its territory and in Belarus.

According to the scenario, this situation could escalate in October if russia deploys troops and medium-range missiles to Kaliningrad. From December 2024, an artificially induced "border conflict" and "clashes with numerous casualties" unfold in the vicinity of the Suwałki Gap (Suwalki Corridor).

At a moment when the United States may be without a leader for several weeks after the elections, russia, with the support of Belarus, repeats the 2014 invasion of Ukraine but on NATO territory. In May 2025, NATO decides on containment measures, and on D-Day, NATO deploys 300,000 military personnel to the eastern flank, including 30,000 soldiers from the Bundeswehr.

The scenario ends 30 days after D-Day. Whether NATO will restrain Russia remains an open question.
________
As long as the US is led by cowardly Democrats, the Russians can launch an offensive against EU countries.
The Russians also see power shifting to the Republicans in 2025. Therefore, only this year the Russians can quickly occupy the maximum number of EU countries.

Your naivety is getting more and more embarrassing.

The document, which hints at NATO or german preparations for a possible attack by Russia, is a scenario to be used in military exercises. It is not a report by intelligence services and also no prediction of a possible war.

This scenario for military drills is a made-up situation to test military capabilities. The term Russia could also be replaced by any other state.

This article has just as much information content as a news item about a fallen bicycle in china. But it was foreseeable that this report would make your day.

Wilm · « **Reply #2168 on:** January 15, 2024, 16:36 »

Quote from: stoker2014 on January 15, 2024, 13:35

As long as the US is led by cowardly Democrats, the Russians can launch an offensive against EU countries.
The Russians also see power shifting to the Republicans in 2025. Therefore, only this year the Russians can quickly occupy the maximum number of EU countries.

Then enlighten us as to why the Russians are waiting until the election is decided. Why should they wait? According to your great logic, they should have taken over the whole of Europe since Biden took office.

stoker2014 · « **Reply #2169 on:** January 16, 2024, 04:16 »

https://www.forexlive.com/news/reports-iran-fired-a-ballistic-missile-which-struck-near-the-us-consulate-in-erbil-iraq-20240115/

Iran’s IRGC says it has targeted areas in Erbil, Iraqi Kurdistan, with ballistic missiles. It says the targets were the positions of “spies and dissident groups”, however Sky News says the US Consulate in Erbil has been attacked by “long-range missiles with great destructive capacity.”
Several missiles have also been shot down before hitting the US base at Erbil airport, Sky News reported.
____

When a coward and friend of the Russians sits in the White House, this will now happen very often. The United States under the Democrats has turned into a worldwide laughingstock and a clown; terrorists from all countries are and will continue to wipe their feet about the United States.

stoker2014 · « **Reply #2170 on:** January 16, 2024, 11:57 »

The Bundeswehr does not comment on the sensational report of the German tabloid Bild regarding NATO's preparations for war with Russia, but confirms that it takes the Russian threat seriously.
Mitko Müller, a representative of the press service of the German Ministry of Defense, said this at a briefing on Monday.

"Basically, I can neither confirm nor deny this media report," the officer said.

At the same time, Müller noted that the Bundeswehr, of course, takes care of current security and political threats, which also include the threat from Russia. The results of the analysis of the situation are reflected in the drawing up of plans and training exercises, as well as in the decision to place a permanent military contingent of the Bundeswehr in Lithuania.

"We wouldn't have stationed this brigade there in the coming years if the threats weren't real," Mueller noted.

He emphasized that the military leadership of Germany takes the threat seriously, therefore it conducts various exercises to increase the combat readiness of the Bundeswehr. The policy, including within NATO, remains deterrence, the officer reminded.

The day before, Bild published the points of a supposedly secret document of the German Ministry of Defense, which contains the assumption that an escalation between NATO and Russia may take place as early as February of this year, and in 2025 the bloc may come to a direct confrontation with Russian troops, approximately in the area of the Baltic states.

__________
Germans, stop drinking and being followers of the policies of KGB agent Merkel!

Tell your citizens the truth. Soon there will be a war with the Russians.
Actually, russia also conducted a lot of “exercises” before the attack on Ukraine.
The Germans must know that when the Russians rape and kill their women, this certainly cannot be called a training exercise.

RalfLiebhold · « **Reply #2171 on:** January 16, 2024, 12:25 »

Quote from: stoker2014 on January 16, 2024, 11:57

Germans, stop drinking and being followers of the policies of KGB agent Merkel!
Tell your citizens the truth. Soon there will be a war with the Russians.
Actually, russia also conducted a lot of “exercises” before the attack on Ukraine.
The Germans must know that when the Russians rape and kill their women, this certainly cannot be called a training exercise.

It's really remarkable how your state of mind and level of behavior has slipped into the unbearable in the last few months.
The only thing that really frightens me is that someone with such violent fantasies is on the loose somewhere in the world.

I assume that you have also lost the basis for other topics in the forum.

Wilm · « **Reply #2172 on:** January 16, 2024, 13:43 »

Quote from: RalfLiebhold on January 16, 2024, 12:25

Quote from: stoker2014 on January 16, 2024, 11:57

Germans, stop drinking and being followers of the policies of KGB agent Merkel!
Tell your citizens the truth. Soon there will be a war with the Russians.
Actually, russia also conducted a lot of “exercises” before the attack on Ukraine.
The Germans must know that when the Russians rape and kill their women, this certainly cannot be called a training exercise.

It's really remarkable how your state of mind and level of behavior has slipped into the unbearable in the last few months.
The only thing that really frightens me is that someone with such violent fantasies is on the loose somewhere in the world.

I assume that you have also lost the basis for other topics in the forum.

Stocker2014 is on drugs or a russian troll. Just ignore him. He or she is living in his or her own world. A flat earther.

Wilm · « **Reply #2173 on:** January 16, 2024, 14:02 »

While our Russian troll - stocker2014 - continues to dream of Trump becoming US president, German politicians from various parties are now warning of precisely this scenario.

They are all certain that support for Ukraine and NATO will end under Trump. They are calling for a military build-up within Europe, as US support will then end. At the same time, of course, even greater flows of refugees from Ukraine are to be feared if the election goes in Trump's favor.

Sahra Wagenknecht, on the other hand, is calling for energy resources to be sourced from Russia again. I no longer know where she fits in politically. She advocates negotiations with Russia and demands that arms deliveries to Ukraine be stopped beforehand.

Zero Talent · « **Reply #2174 on:** January 16, 2024, 14:54 »

Quote from: Wilm on January 16, 2024, 14:02

At the same time, of course, even greater flows of refugees from Ukraine are to be feared if the election goes in Trump's favor.

It will be so sad (but also ironic) for stocker to end-up a refugee in the Germany he is so vehemently despising, once trump will cut all US aid for Ukraine...

MicrostockGroup Sponsors

Author Topic: This should settle some different opinions (Read 142436 times)

stoker2014

stoker2014

Big Toe

RalfLiebhold

stoker2014

Big Toe

Wilm

Wilm

stoker2014

stoker2014

stoker2014

stoker2014

Wilm

stoker2014

stoker2014

stoker2014

stoker2014

RalfLiebhold

Wilm

stoker2014

stoker2014

RalfLiebhold

Wilm

Wilm

Zero Talent

Related Topics

Sponsors

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors