pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: This should settle some different opinions  (Read 131594 times)

0 Members and 12 Guests are viewing this topic.

« Reply #75 on: April 11, 2023, 13:44 »
0
When it comes to nuclear energy, the Germans are probably an exception worldwide. Until the next accident happens.

When you see the documentations here, how negligently radioactive waste is handled, which does not bring any more money, but whose interim storage costs, I feel sick.

I hope for nuclear fusion, I hope for huge battery storage facilities, I hope for low-energy hydrogen production. But I don't want a second Chernobyl. Nuclear energy is not safe because people with certain interests run it. The risk is just too high.

The next accident will come - it's not a question of if, but when. And when it happens in the most densely populated area, everyone will understand where the problem is.


« Reply #76 on: April 11, 2023, 14:39 »
+1

I agree that the russian troll farm didn't exist back in the day and some of the decisions may have come out of good intentions (exemplifying the law of unintended consequences, as I said above).

However, these days, the russian troll farm is pushing hard the climate change topic, to make sure Russia remains dominant on the energy market (speaking about the ultimate hypochrisy  ::))

Here are some examples of memes, targeting the public opinion, as a way to influence politicians (from US, but I'm sure you have your fair share in EU)

We are probably not that far apart.
Of course, these Russian troll farms influence public opinion. In Germany at the moment, this is aimed more at the Ukrainian refugees and finds fertile ground among right-wingers.

However, I don't see any evidence that this propaganda is influencing political decisions on the whole, at least in Germany.


« Reply #77 on: April 11, 2023, 15:01 »
0
However, I don't see any evidence that this propaganda is influencing political decisions on the whole, at least in Germany.

I'm fairy certain that most politicians do listen to the public opinion and act accordingly or else they don't get (re)elected (especially these days, when populism is on the rise).
« Last Edit: April 11, 2023, 15:03 by Zero Talent »

« Reply #78 on: April 11, 2023, 15:15 »
+1
But I don't want a second Chernobyl.
Forget Chernobyl. Now such nuclear power plants are no longer being built, modern plants are much more reliable and safer.
For example, the Russians are constantly shelling the Zaporizhzhya nuclear power plant in Ukraine, disconnecting it from the power grid, storing ammunition on its territory, but the station is still standing, although for some reason the whole world does not care about it.
At the expense of Chernobyl, the accident was then the result of experiments conducted by the Kremlin on Ukrainian soil. I can't say that it was a planned genocide of Ukrainians, but I heard that experiments were simply made at this station for the dissertation of some official in Moscow. Accordingly, the station was loaded beyond its capabilities. Further, the USSR tried to hide everything from the world as much as possible, as a result, the necessary assistance was not received in a timely manner.

« Reply #79 on: April 11, 2023, 15:24 »
+1
However, I don't see any evidence that this propaganda is influencing political decisions on the whole, at least in Germany.

I'm fairy certain that most politicians do listen to the public opinion and act accordingly or else they don't get (re)elected (especially these days, when populism is on the rise).

From my point of view, only a small, albeit extreme, part of the population is impressed and influenced by Russian propaganda.

To your thesis about the hearing of politicians for the population:

Nuclear power plants are switched off here in Germany this month against the will of around 2 thirds of the population.





« Reply #80 on: April 11, 2023, 15:56 »
+1
But I don't want a second Chernobyl.
Forget Chernobyl. Now such nuclear power plants are no longer being built, modern plants are much more reliable and safer.
For example, the Russians are constantly shelling the Zaporizhzhya nuclear power plant in Ukraine, disconnecting it from the power grid, storing ammunition on its territory, but the station is still standing, although for some reason the whole world does not care about it.
At the expense of Chernobyl, the accident was then the result of experiments conducted by the Kremlin on Ukrainian soil. I can't say that it was a planned genocide of Ukrainians, but I heard that experiments were simply made at this station for the dissertation of some official in Moscow. Accordingly, the station was loaded beyond its capabilities. Further, the USSR tried to hide everything from the world as much as possible, as a result, the necessary assistance was not received in a timely manner.

Most of the consequences of the Chernobyl disaster have to be borne by Ukrainians and Belarusians - not by Russians themselves. And when the Russians threaten to use nuclear weapons today, they are at the same time threatening the countries around which they want to make the Russian Empire "great again". A paradox in itself.

The handling of Zaporizhzhya is clearly part of this questionable way of thinking.

I do not believe in safe nuclear power plants. Fukushima should be mentioned as an example. Here, too, there were timely indications of risk factors such as exist worldwide for nuclear power plants. And therefore I cannot forget them! Also because I live here in Europe and not somewhere else where Chernobyl was not noticeable except in the media.

And again: it is not only about the safety of nuclear power plants. It is also about the aftermath!



« Reply #81 on: April 11, 2023, 16:36 »
0
However, I don't see any evidence that this propaganda is influencing political decisions on the whole, at least in Germany.

I'm fairy certain that most politicians do listen to the public opinion and act accordingly or else they don't get (re)elected (especially these days, when populism is on the rise).

From my point of view, only a small, albeit extreme, part of the population is impressed and influenced by Russian propaganda.

To your thesis about the hearing of politicians for the population:

Nuclear power plants are switched off here in Germany this month against the will of around 2 thirds of the population.

You make a good point here.
Nevertheless, no matter the reasons, one way or another, this decision plays right into putin's hand.
« Last Edit: April 12, 2023, 10:31 by Zero Talent »

« Reply #82 on: April 12, 2023, 02:54 »
+3
And when the Russians threaten to use nuclear weapons today, they are at the same time threatening the countries around which they want to make the Russian Empire "great again". A paradox in itself.
The great empire in Russian concerns only the titular nation, only Russians by nationality. All other occupied peoples in this empire as slaves, who are not sorry. Yes, and the Russians do not feel sorry for their own nation, in Russia there are only 2 cities in which the elect live, these are Moscow and St. Petersburg, these are the centers of the Russian empire. Now in Russia, the mobilization of the population for the war in Ukraine, in Moscow and St. Petersburg, few people are taken, driven to slaughter, mainly peoples of other nationalities or Russians by nationality from other cities.
Russia is a horde, originates from the Mongol-Tatar yoke, nothing has changed there. This empire lives only through murder, terrorism, occupation, enslavement and robbery. In this she sees her greatness.
How do you see your energy security without nuclear power plants?

« Reply #83 on: April 12, 2023, 03:14 »
+2
And when the Russians threaten to use nuclear weapons today, they are at the same time threatening the countries around which they want to make the Russian Empire "great again". A paradox in itself.
The great empire in Russian concerns only the titular nation, only Russians by nationality. All other occupied peoples in this empire as slaves, who are not sorry. Yes, and the Russians do not feel sorry for their own nation, in Russia there are only 2 cities in which the elect live, these are Moscow and St. Petersburg, these are the centers of the Russian empire. Now in Russia, the mobilization of the population for the war in Ukraine, in Moscow and St. Petersburg, few people are taken, driven to slaughter, mainly peoples of other nationalities or Russians by nationality from other cities.
Russia is a horde, originates from the Mongol-Tatar yoke, nothing has changed there. This empire lives only through murder, terrorism, occupation, enslavement and robbery. In this she sees her greatness.
How do you see your energy security without nuclear power plants?

Personally, I am opposed to such generalizations. I believe that the majority of Russians - just like us - want peaceful coexistence. The discord is sown by those who in their narcissism strive for power, influence and more and more money. All over the globe. And these people try to push dictatorial measures so that they get even more power.

« Reply #84 on: April 12, 2023, 04:06 »
+2
And when the Russians threaten to use nuclear weapons today, they are at the same time threatening the countries around which they want to make the Russian Empire "great again". A paradox in itself.
The great empire in Russian concerns only the titular nation, only Russians by nationality. All other occupied peoples in this empire as slaves, who are not sorry. Yes, and the Russians do not feel sorry for their own nation, in Russia there are only 2 cities in which the elect live, these are Moscow and St. Petersburg, these are the centers of the Russian empire. Now in Russia, the mobilization of the population for the war in Ukraine, in Moscow and St. Petersburg, few people are taken, driven to slaughter, mainly peoples of other nationalities or Russians by nationality from other cities.
Russia is a horde, originates from the Mongol-Tatar yoke, nothing has changed there. This empire lives only through murder, terrorism, occupation, enslavement and robbery. In this she sees her greatness.
How do you see your energy security without nuclear power plants?

Personally, I am opposed to such generalizations. I believe that the majority of Russians - just like us - want peaceful coexistence. The discord is sown by those who in their narcissism strive for power, influence and more and more money. All over the globe. And these people try to push dictatorial measures so that they get even more power.
From a philosophical point of view, you are right. Children are also born innocent.
But do not forget that in Russia there is a totalitarian system, fascism, from childhood a person is fed only with propaganda and they say that there are only enemies around. Power in Russia is supported by approximately 80-90% of the population. Those who do not support have long since left. But among Russian emigrants in other countries there are also a lot of those who support Putin and the regime. The whole history of Russia is totalitarianism, autocracy, occupation and genocide of other nations.
So how do you see the existence of Germany without nuclear energy without energy resources? In fact, if you do not panic, but think, and divide the number of serious accidents at nuclear power plants by the total number of all nuclear power plants in the world, you will not get a large percentage. If you approach the issue wisely and correctly, you can quite live for some time with nuclear power plants, until humanity invents something safer. Nuclear power plants are still more environmentally friendly energy than burning coal or gas.

« Reply #85 on: April 12, 2023, 07:26 »
+2

I believe that the majority of Russians - just like us - want peaceful coexistence. The discord is sown by those who in their narcissism strive for power, influence and more and more money. All over the globe. And these people try to push dictatorial measures so that they get even more power.

Check the reactions to this ISIS like beheading video that surfaced on russian social media and compare the number of likes, happy faces and hearts to the other reactions.
I know this is not representative for the whole population, but it's still telling a story, about how deep propaganda has cut into regular russians' brains.

https://twitter.com/apmassaro3/status/1645903680967700485
« Last Edit: April 12, 2023, 07:56 by Zero Talent »

« Reply #86 on: April 12, 2023, 11:59 »
+1
I think a lot of the work of troll farms is to just amplify the conflict in other countries. Often they push both sides of an argument, and even have tried to foment physical conflict such as planning rallies pro or con something and then whipping up outrage on both sides. Of course this effort is aided by the social media algorithms that push controversy and engagement at all cost.

I think the final result of Russia's push to punish and control Europe with energy policy might be to hasten energy autonomy and the greener energy revolution.


Of course they can also push a specific agenda too.

Just_to_inform_people2

« Reply #87 on: April 12, 2023, 14:46 »
0
You can also argue that if the Western world did not participate in the coup in 2014 in Ukraine and Nato stayed with it's promise not to get closer to Russian's border all of this would not have taken place. It's not that I take side of Russia but sure as hell the Western world is guilty here as well. Nobody cared when the Ukranian army was bombarding houses and people in the East of Ukraine because, hey, it was a pro-western government. Same as being lied to that the Western world have no part in this conflict while the leaked documents completely say the contrary. It goes way beyond sending weapons. All political play.
But I guess if the western world wants to wage war against russia then the split in the world community (everybody is taking sides now) actually started when the Westen world continued to work their way up east, USA, EU and NATO. History will tell and I know a lot of people don't see it now but for me it's pretty clear.
But good luck with destroying Russia. The world might be a better place without it, but I guess China is next and then maybe India until everybody lives as the USA and the EU dictates us how to live.
It worked also very well in Irak, Libia, Afghanistan and each country that the Western world had invaded and left in rubbles. They all had to be liberated and what paradises they have become :)

Annie2022

« Reply #88 on: April 12, 2023, 15:13 »
0
You can also argue that if the Western world did not participate in the coup in 2014 in Ukraine and Nato stayed with it's promise not to get closer to Russian's border all of this would not have taken place. It's not that I take side of Russia but sure as hell the Western world is guilty here as well. Nobody cared when the Ukranian army was bombarding houses and people in the East of Ukraine because, hey, it was a pro-western government. Same as being lied to that the Western world have no part in this conflict while the leaked documents completely say the contrary. It goes way beyond sending weapons. All political play.
But I guess if the western world wants to wage war against russia then the split in the world community (everybody is taking sides now) actually started when the Westen world continued to work their way up east, USA, EU and NATO. History will tell and I know a lot of people don't see it now but for me it's pretty clear.
But good luck with destroying Russia. The world might be a better place without it, but I guess China is next and then maybe India until everybody lives as the USA and the EU dictates us how to live.
It worked also very well in Irak, Libia, Afghanistan and each country that the Western world had invaded and left in rubbles. They all had to be liberated and what paradises they have become :)

The problem is that Putin's aim for a very long time was to dismantle NATO and weaken the EU. He has systematically placed his puppets in as many leadership roles as possible, removed Britain from the EU, and controlled certain Western media (such as Fox News where he and Murdoch have had a long standing 'friendship') through election interference and other nefarious means.  This has been well documented by international Intelligence organizations, and whistleblowers from past organizations such as Cambridge Analytica.

I understand your comments about those middle east countries, but in most cases that was a different administration with different agendas.

But what do we do about Putin's ever-mounting control over democratic countries? Doesn't this remind you of the rise of the 1930s dictators? Didn't we learn from history that they should have been stopped well before world war started?

What you are saying may sound like fair and even rhetoric (repeated many times from elsewhere) - but all of our democratic freedoms are at stake. Yours included.



And its not just the EU or USA - it was here too. Its worldwide. Doesn't that scare the bejeebies out of you?

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-02-10/russia-foreign-interference-australian-election/100819910

Quote
Russia has been identified as one of the main countries attempting to interfere in Australia's democracy, with intelligence agencies monitoring continuing efforts by Moscow to influence politics here.

A current intelligence source and a government source have confirmed the country's domestic spy agency, ASIO, has recently investigated at least one major effort to back pro-Russian figures for an unspecified Australian political contest.

Most details of the conspiracy remain hidden, but the ABC has confirmed it involved an individual based in Australia with close links to President Vladmir Putin's regime.

... "The point of difference between Russia and China is that Russia is an opportunistic interferer in elections anywhere in the Western world but, particularly, focusing on Five-Eyes [an intelligence-sharing network that includes Australia] and EU destabilisation".

Don't stop (or 'destroy' as you said) Russia - stop Putin and his propaganda machine.

...

On a sad note, Navalny may be dying, lawyers say he may be poisoned again.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-04-13/lawyers-for-jailed-russian-alexei-navalny-say-he-was-poisoned/102216460


« Last Edit: April 12, 2023, 16:08 by Annie »

« Reply #89 on: April 12, 2023, 16:08 »
+2
You can also argue that if the Western world did not participate in the coup in 2014 in Ukraine and Nato stayed with it's promise not to get closer to Russian's border all of this would not have taken place.

This is BS.
NATO is not expanding. NATO is joined.
NATO didn't expand in Finland last month. Finland decided to join the alliance.

There was never a promise, let alone a treaty denying the right of any other sovereign country, be it from east or west, to join NATO. There is no such thing.

Your are falling hard for the russian propaganda, mouthing Putin's words.

Moreover, you are deliberately confusing a popular uprising with a coup d'etat, falling, again, for the same russian propaganda.

Remind them that they are proud of their 1918 bolshevik revolution, not of their 1918 coup d'etat.  ;)
« Last Edit: April 12, 2023, 16:42 by Zero Talent »

Just_to_inform_people2

« Reply #90 on: April 12, 2023, 16:20 »
0
You can also argue that if the Western world did not participate in the coup in 2014 in Ukraine and Nato stayed with it's promise not to get closer to Russian's border all of this would not have taken place. It's not that I take side of Russia but sure as hell the Western world is guilty here as well. Nobody cared when the Ukranian army was bombarding houses and people in the East of Ukraine because, hey, it was a pro-western government. Same as being lied to that the Western world have no part in this conflict while the leaked documents completely say the contrary. It goes way beyond sending weapons. All political play.
But I guess if the western world wants to wage war against russia then the split in the world community (everybody is taking sides now) actually started when the Westen world continued to work their way up east, USA, EU and NATO. History will tell and I know a lot of people don't see it now but for me it's pretty clear.
But good luck with destroying Russia. The world might be a better place without it, but I guess China is next and then maybe India until everybody lives as the USA and the EU dictates us how to live.
It worked also very well in Irak, Libia, Afghanistan and each country that the Western world had invaded and left in rubbles. They all had to be liberated and what paradises they have become :)

The problem is that Putin's aim for a very long time was to dismantle NATO and weaken the EU. He has systematically placed his puppets in as many leadership roles as possible, removed Britain from the EU, and controlled certain Western media (such as Fox News where he and Murdoch have had a long standing 'friendship') through election interference and other nefarious means.  This has been well documented by international Intelligence organizations, and whistleblowers from past organizations such as Cambridge Analytica.

I understand your comments about those middle east countries, but in most cases that was a different administration with different agendas.

But what do we do about Putin's ever-mounting control over democratic countries? Doesn't this remind you of the rise of the 1930s dictators? Didn't we learn from history that they should have been stopped well before world war started?

What you are saying may sound like fair and even rhetoric (repeated many times from elsewhere) - but all of our democratic freedoms are at stake. Yours included.



And its not just the EU or USA - it was here too. Its worldwide. Doesn't that scare the bejeebies out of you?

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-02-10/russia-foreign-interference-australian-election/100819910

Quote
Russia has been identified as one of the main countries attempting to interfere in Australia's democracy, with intelligence agencies monitoring continuing efforts by Moscow to influence politics here.

A current intelligence source and a government source have confirmed the country's domestic spy agency, ASIO, has recently investigated at least one major effort to back pro-Russian figures for an unspecified Australian political contest.

Most details of the conspiracy remain hidden, but the ABC has confirmed it involved an individual based in Australia with close links to President Vladmir Putin's regime.

... "The point of difference between Russia and China is that Russia is an opportunistic interferer in elections anywhere in the Western world but, particularly, focusing on Five-Eyes [an intelligence-sharing network that includes Australia] and EU destabilisation".

Don't stop (or 'destroy' as you said) Russia - stop Putin and his propaganda machine.

.



If you would look at a historical map of how NATO grew over the last decades you will see that have taken a lot of ground towards Russia. Something America would not never have stand for it it happened to them. I really can't believe that Brexit was caused by the russians, more by EU restrictive rules how to rule your own country and they did not like it. America is divided but I also really don't think the russians had anything to do with that. That all parties want to get into eachother's kitchen is a given. According to the leaked documents (false or not) America has lot of contacts within the Kremlin. And sure russians will try the and have the same here. As well as the australians, english, german, french and chinese in whichever country they please. I can give you tons of articles from respected media that reported that.

What scares me is that everybody seems to be on a war path. I see America poking all countries they don't like and the EU is joining them in the poking. I understand there are economical things at play but it could get rather messy if we continue poking everyone. And that is certainly the current administration doing that, not the previous one.


Just_to_inform_people2

« Reply #92 on: April 12, 2023, 16:41 »
0
You can also argue that if the Western world did not participate in the coup in 2014 in Ukraine and Nato stayed with it's promise not to get closer to Russian's border all of this would not have taken place.

This is BS.
NATO is not expanding. NATO is joined.
NATO didn't expand in Finland last month. Finland decided to join the alliance.

There was never a promise, let alone a treaty denying the right of any other sovereign country, be it from east or west, to join NATO. There is no such thing.

Your are falling hard for the russian propaganda, mouthing Putin's words.

Moreover, you are deliberately confusing a popular uprising with a coup d'etat, falling, again, for the same russian propaganda.

Remind them that their are proud of their 1918 bolshevik revolution, not of their 1918 coup d'etat.  ;)

Agreements were made but not on paper. But certainly recognized by all parties. I am not falling for anything, it's not hard to study what happened in Ukraine through history and how the EU started to pull at them having even european politicians standing on Maiden square during the so called uprising. But they have won and people in the east were left behind. They did not want to join the EU but that was not respected. In fact for ten years they were attacked, drove out of their houses ans stripped of all their rights. I did not hear you then. And if you think a part of a country can liberate themselves by an uprise, as the west of Ukraine did, then I would imagine you will stand also with the basks and catalonian people in Spain, the Vlemish people in Belgium, the Northern Italians in Italy,  the Irish, the Scottish people, people in Cyprus, and I guess there will also be certain groups of people that would like to distance themselves from the federal government in the USA. But somehow when it's not to your liking then that freedom's stride is not acknowledged or is it? That is called hypocrisy in my opinion.

« Reply #93 on: April 12, 2023, 16:59 »
+2

Agreements were made but not on paper. But certainly recognized by all parties. I am not falling for anything,

Yes. You do.
How naive or stupid do you think the soviets were, to trust a verbal promise, instead of a written one?

They were neither naive nor stupid, because such thing never existed.

What was the discussed, back when the German reunification was negotiated, was whether or not the West German army (part of NATO) to be allowed to move into East Germany.
"East", during this negotiation only meant "East Germany", not anything else.
Obviously, a reunited Germany couldn't accept not to control the eastern part of country, and, in the end, everybody agreed, soviets inclusive, that NATO troops could move into East Germany.

In exchange, the soviet army was given extra time to withdraw.

That's it.

Nothing else was discussed about any other country, because all other East European countries were part of the Warsaw treaty.
Back then, it was unconceivable for all negociators, soviets inclusive, that the Warsaw treaty would ever cease to exist.

Putin is now claiming that "east" meant every other country in Eastern-Europe.
He implies that the soviets who negotiated the deal were stupid.

Nonsense.
« Last Edit: April 12, 2023, 18:47 by Zero Talent »

« Reply #94 on: April 12, 2023, 23:31 »
0
You can also argue that if the Western world did not participate in the coup in 2014 in Ukraine and Nato stayed with it's promise not to get closer to Russian's border all of this would not have taken place.

This is BS.
NATO is not expanding. NATO is joined.
NATO didn't expand in Finland last month. Finland decided to join the alliance.

There was never a promise, let alone a treaty denying the right of any other sovereign country, be it from east or west, to join NATO. There is no such thing.

Your are falling hard for the russian propaganda, mouthing Putin's words.


Here we go again  ;D

You are the only spreading the propaganda about this matter...because it was clearly promised multiple times


Once again , one of those times on February 9. 1990, memorandum transcript published by National Security Archive at George Washington University in Washington, DC. Secretary of State Baker reassured Soviet Premier Mikhail Gorbachev not once, but three times NATO will not expand to the east.

I'll quote Baker: not only for the Soviet Union but for other European countries as well it is important to have guarantees that if the United States keeps its presence in Germany within the framework of NATO, not an inch of NATOs present military jurisdiction will spread in an eastern direction.



The document itself, black on white:

https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/document/16116-document-05-memorandum-conversation-between



I really don't understand Russians and Americans thinking that the rest of world is stupid not seeing the dominance games they are playing on cost on innocent people in the world.




« Reply #95 on: April 13, 2023, 05:10 »
+1
The world is full of trolls.

Even in democratic countries.

Because of one of these trolls this thread was opened.
He has been lying and twisting facts for a long time. Yet he has an immense following. Who believe him blindly. I certainly don't mean to imply that there are only angels in the democratic ranks. But Trump is clearly a greater danger to democracy.

Brexit:
Farage, Smith and Johnson have been telling brazen lies to push the Brexit. Among other things, they claimed that the UK would transfer 350 million a week to the EU (the figure is false) and this money would be invested in the UK health service after Brexit. They later distanced themselves from this lie. There are, of course, other lies that have blown up on their own as the UK has evolved.

Iraq:
Colin Powell, George W. Bush and Tony Blair ushered in the Iraq war with a brazen lie. The evidence of weapons of mass destruction. Powell bitterly regretted this before his death.

In general, we should always keep in mind that we too are fueled by propaganda - not just the Russians.

« Reply #96 on: April 13, 2023, 05:47 »
+4
The strengthening and expansion of NATO is also partly due to Russian misconduct after 1990. There were military invasions or interventions in countries of the (former) Russian Federation that were striving for independence. Partly, although these countries were open to negotiations.
This in turn led to the countries that had also historically been affected by similar Russian invasions seeking protection in NATO in particular.

Putin himself stated during a press conference in 2004 that Russia was not worried about NATO enlargement with regard to the security of the Russian Federation.

Incidentally, Mikhail Gorbachev himself had thought about NATO membership.

Lavrov had said in an interview in 2005 - with regard to a potential NATO accession of Ukraine and Hungary - that every state had the right to choose its partners and organizations itself. Russia recognizes this right.


I readily admit that I can understand that Russia feels its security interests are threatened as NATO moves ever closer. But NATO has not persuaded or forced any of these states to do so. These countries initiated the membership application of their own volition (and security needs). As was recently the case in Finland, where the majority of the population had always opposed NATO membership in the past. Now the people feel threatened in their security and are afraid of a Russian invasion.

Incidentally, there was the Budapest Memorandum, in which Ukraine was promised state sovereignty (we now know how this worked out) if it disarmed all nuclear weapons. Ukraine has implemented the latter.

« Reply #97 on: April 13, 2023, 06:17 »
+1
You can also argue that if the Western world did not participate in the coup in 2014 in Ukraine and Nato stayed with it's promise not to get closer to Russian's border all of this would not have taken place.

This is BS.
NATO is not expanding. NATO is joined.
NATO didn't expand in Finland last month. Finland decided to join the alliance.

There was never a promise, let alone a treaty denying the right of any other sovereign country, be it from east or west, to join NATO. There is no such thing.

Your are falling hard for the russian propaganda, mouthing Putin's words.


Here we go again  ;D

You are the only spreading the propaganda about this matter...because it was clearly promised multiple times


Once again , one of those times on February 9. 1990, memorandum transcript published by National Security Archive at George Washington University in Washington, DC. Secretary of State Baker reassured Soviet Premier Mikhail Gorbachev not once, but three times NATO will not expand to the east.

I'll quote Baker: not only for the Soviet Union but for other European countries as well it is important to have guarantees that if the United States keeps its presence in Germany within the framework of NATO, not an inch of NATOs present military jurisdiction will spread in an eastern direction.



The document itself, black on white:

https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/document/16116-document-05-memorandum-conversation-between



I really don't understand Russians and Americans thinking that the rest of world is stupid not seeing the dominance games they are playing on cost on innocent people in the world.

"Back in Washington, the National Security Council staff was alarmed. The word jurisdiction could imply that the NATO doctrine of collective defense would apply only to part of German territory, limiting German sovereignty. It was one thing to agree not to move troops into the East right away, as far as American officials were concerned, but all of Germany had to be part of NATO.

The N.S.C. got to him pretty quickly and said that language might be misinterpreted, Condoleezza Rice, then a Soviet adviser to Mr. Bush and later secretary of state under President George W. Bush, remembered in an interview for a biography of Mr. Baker.

Mr. Baker got the message and began walking back his words by ditching the term jurisdiction from all future discussions. Chancellor Helmut Kohl of West Germany likewise rejected Mr. Genschers formulation.

I may have been a little bit forward on my skis on that, but they changed it and he knew that they changed it, Mr. Baker recalled of Mr. Gorbachev. He never once again in all the months that followed ever raised the question of NATO expanding its jurisdiction eastward. He then signed documents in which NATO did expand its jurisdiction.

When Mr. Baker returned to Moscow in May, he offered what were called the nine reassurances, including a commitment to allow Soviet troops in East Germany to remain for a transition period and not extend NATO forces into that territory until they left. This was hardly a promise not to extend the alliance east, but he insisted to the Soviets that this was the best the United States could do.
Mr. Gorbachev eventually agreed. The final treaty unifying Germany later in 1990 barred foreign troops from the old East Germany, but German troops assigned to NATO could be deployed there once Soviet forces withdrew by the end of 1994. Nothing in the treaty addressed NATO expansion beyond that.

Now remember, its not clear the Soviet Union is going to collapse at this point, Dr. Rice recalled. Its not even clear that the Warsaw Pact is going to collapse. This is about the unification of Germany. She added, The expansion of NATO was just not on the table as an issue in 90-91.

No less a witness agreed than Mr. Gorbachev. The topic of NATO expansion was not discussed at all, and it wasnt brought up in those years, he told an interviewer after Russias intervention in Ukraine seven years ago. The issue was foreign troops in eastern Germany. Bakers statement about not one inch was made in that context, Mr. Gorbachev said. Everything that could have been and needed to be done to solidify that political obligation was done. And fulfilled.



« Reply #98 on: April 13, 2023, 09:02 »
+3
You can also argue that if the Western world did not participate in the coup in 2014 in Ukraine and Nato stayed with it's promise not to get closer to Russian's border all of this would not have taken place. It's not that I take side of Russia but sure as hell the Western world is guilty here as well. Nobody cared when the Ukranian army was bombarding houses and people in the East of Ukraine because, hey, it was a pro-western government. Same as being lied to that the Western world have no part in this conflict while the leaked documents completely say the contrary. It goes way beyond sending weapons. All political play.
Every word is a lie and a copy of Russian propaganda. Do not write more in this thread, I do not read Russian propaganda. This applies to all your subsequent posts.
The Ukrainian army does not fire at civilians and their homes, this is all done by Russian fascists and Russian occupiers.

But I guess if the western world wants to wage war against russia then the split in the world community (everybody is taking sides now) actually started when the Westen world continued to work their way up east, USA, EU and NATO. History will tell and I know a lot of people don't see it now but for me it's pretty clear.
But good luck with destroying Russia. The world might be a better place without it, but I guess China is next and then maybe India until everybody lives as the USA and the EU dictates us how to live.
It worked also very well in Irak, Libia, Afghanistan and each country that the Western world had invaded and left in rubbles. They all had to be liberated and what paradises they have become :)
This is Russian propaganda, there are 99 percent lies here.

p.s. I will be forced to add you to ignore.

« Reply #99 on: April 13, 2023, 09:08 »
+2
You can also argue that if the Western world did not participate in the coup in 2014 in Ukraine and Nato stayed with it's promise not to get closer to Russian's border all of this would not have taken place.

This is BS.
NATO is not expanding. NATO is joined.
NATO didn't expand in Finland last month. Finland decided to join the alliance.

There was never a promise, let alone a treaty denying the right of any other sovereign country, be it from east or west, to join NATO. There is no such thing.

Your are falling hard for the russian propaganda, mouthing Putin's words.


Here we go again  ;D

You are the only spreading the propaganda about this matter...because it was clearly promised multiple times


Once again , one of those times on February 9. 1990, memorandum transcript published by National Security Archive at George Washington University in Washington, DC. Secretary of State Baker reassured Soviet Premier Mikhail Gorbachev not once, but three times NATO will not expand to the east.

I'll quote Baker: not only for the Soviet Union but for other European countries as well it is important to have guarantees that if the United States keeps its presence in Germany within the framework of NATO, not an inch of NATOs present military jurisdiction will spread in an eastern direction.



The document itself, black on white:

https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/document/16116-document-05-memorandum-conversation-between



I really don't understand Russians and Americans thinking that the rest of world is stupid not seeing the dominance games they are playing on cost on innocent people in the world.
These are all oral conversations, the USSR is no longer on the world map for 30 years. The legal successor of the USSR are many states, incl. and Ukraine.

Russia violated the Budapest non-aggression memorandum on Ukraine, which it signed itself and in which it was the guarantor of non-aggression. Any agreements with Russia are not even worth the paper on which they are written. Russia is a fascist and terrorist country. Everyone knows what to do with terrorists and what kind of conversation should be with them.
« Last Edit: April 13, 2023, 09:11 by stoker2014 »


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
5 Replies
6188 Views
Last post September 20, 2007, 17:44
by litifeta
9 Replies
6313 Views
Last post June 08, 2008, 16:58
by runamock
1 Replies
4707 Views
Last post February 26, 2009, 05:56
by Danicek
10 Replies
7268 Views
Last post January 23, 2012, 12:43
by stockmarketer
4 Replies
3126 Views
Last post June 14, 2015, 07:16
by Pauws99

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors