Author Topic: Charlies Angels gallery and stats (Read 6369 times)

.shock · « **on:** January 09, 2008, 19:28 »

6 models, 3h shooting, 1 month of editing, 4 days keywording and uploading.
Totally 764 images taken and 346 selected of 380 edited and submitted images... 3 images sold in 2 days. Hope more will be soon.

View 20min behind scene video and all 764 non-edited images by visiting my personal web page www.shock.co.ba

Gallery link:
http://www.fotolia.com/Galleries/f4TUD2mh0t1bEiEkLOin3n1qrTWGm42I?order=nb_views&limit=48

Regards,
.shock

sharply_done · « **Reply #1 on:** January 09, 2008, 21:24 »

Geez, I hate to say it, but those big blue balls may make your pictures a hard sell ...

.shock · « **Reply #2 on:** January 10, 2008, 02:53 »

Hmm maybe you are right but wee will see, maybe someone need images just like this.

Sean Locke Photography · « **Reply #3 on:** January 26, 2008, 18:14 »

Are you asking for a critique? I think the biggest thing is the poor lighting setup. You can see the umbrellas all over the place and the ceiling is blown out all over. Second would be it looks extremely fake and setup - a very obvious staged event, unless that's what you were going for. Also you have a lot of poor compositions. I think 700 images of this is waaaaay overkill in uploading. If that's how fotolia's acceptance process works, I can't say I'm sorry I'm not there.

yingyang0 · « **Reply #4 on:** January 27, 2008, 02:40 »

Why is this woman taking an orange crap on the nice wood floor?

travelstock · « **Reply #5 on:** January 27, 2008, 05:29 »

Quote from: yingyang0 on January 27, 2008, 02:40

Why is this woman taking an orange crap on the nice wood floor?

That's the funniest thing I've seen all day. Classic.

sharply_done · « **Reply #6 on:** January 27, 2008, 06:05 »

You guys are mean.
Funny, but mean.

hatman12 · « **Reply #7 on:** January 27, 2008, 06:47 »

WHOA! Let's try to be positive please peeps...

Yes, I agree with all the comments. Yes, the composition of many of these pictures leaves much to be desired (and I certainly wouldn't want my name associated with them). Yes, the quality appears to be poor, with stray arms and legs everywhere, bad lighting and even umbrellas and reflectors visible.

BUT (and it's a big BUT)..... at least dotshock has made an EFFORT; he's gained access to a gym, organised six girls to do the modelling, shipped all his lighting kit there, and then spent three hours and countless days trying to produce a professional quality set of truly stock images. That's a lot of thought and effort, so for that he gets 100% brownie marks.

The set isn't going to sell well, and in due course dotshock will be asking himself all the right questions.

But at least he's TRIED, and from that he'll learn important lessons.

Sean Locke Photography · « **Reply #8 on:** January 27, 2008, 09:02 »

I would suggest trying a bit smaller, getting it right, and them moving up to something larger. Anyways, now he knows the issues with this set.

So, congrats on the effort. Keep working on the results.

maunger · « **Reply #9 on:** January 27, 2008, 09:26 »

i agree - good effort, but some issues with lighting/model placement etc.... the orange weights under that gal made me laugh too right away... they should be cloned out.

More effort than i'm putting in so the photog gets more bonus points than i deserve!

hatman12 · « **Reply #10 on:** January 27, 2008, 15:02 »

41 downloads in the set so far, after being on sale for three weeks or so.

Despite the negatives, the set is making money.

.shock · « **Reply #11 on:** August 26, 2008, 02:27 »

Hi,

I'm just find trought google search this post and wish to to share couple of images from another set, couple months later, 2-3h shooting, same girls, same equipment (d80, 18-50 f2.8, 50mm f1.5, 10-20mm f4)...

Wish to here some comments if I don't asking to much. Comment's on first set of images was help me...

Here is cople images, whole gallery is on link:
http://www.shock.co.ba/index.php?option=com_zoom&Itemid=2&catid=32

Folder on fotolia:
http://www.fotolia.com/Galleries/GZdOVUsmqMPVP4IipD8yEQo6O9Cby925?order=nb_downloads

Regards,
BA

grp_photo · « **Reply #12 on:** August 26, 2008, 04:41 »

I like one picture, but i agree that the quality of some pics in the set is questionable but if it sells everything is fine

hatman12 · « **Reply #13 on:** August 27, 2008, 02:13 »

Huge improvement dotshock.. Well done.

MicrostockGroup Sponsors

Author Topic: Charlies Angels gallery and stats (Read 6369 times)

.shock

sharply_done

.shock

Sean Locke Photography

yingyang0

travelstock

sharply_done

hatman12

Sean Locke Photography

maunger

hatman12

.shock

grp_photo

hatman12

Related Topics

Sponsors

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors