MicrostockGroup Sponsors

Gamma help

Started by Read_My_Rights, December 04, 2007, 22:51

Previous topic - Next topic

Read_My_Rights

Just bought a new computer system with new 24in monitor for 1980x1200 pixel real estate.
When I looked at somebodies folio on IS it seemd that most of the pictures are rather bright on my new monitor. Mind you I did the color correction and are able to distinguish
5,5,5 (2% over Black) from 0,0,0 (0% true black) and at the same time 252,252,252 (99% white) from true white (255,255,255).
Could somebody look at the same pictures here:
http://www.istockphoto.com/file_search.php?action=file&userID=836613
and tell me if they think the pictures appear with good gamma on their monitor or are they washed out. Thanks guys this would be greatly appreciated, because I am wondering if I prepared most of my pictures with the WRONG color correction.

If you could include OS (windows/Mac/Linus) that would greatly help. I just read that for best web display gamma of 2.2-2.5 is appropriate??? Any thoughts.

Thanks alot

PS. It does not matter if I like my pictures: you and the reviewers have to like them.
ID withheld to protect the (not so) innocent;)

ale1969

They look fine on my monitor (windows OS)
My "fun" photos on Flickr:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21927800@N03/

hatman12

Look like very nice deeply saturated pics to me.

Void

they look great on a calibrated macbook!
nice shots!

louoates

On my new $2,000+ Eizo monitor your images look, well, outstanding.

Read_My_Rights

Then I definitely have to tweak my new setup to make them look nice. I guess its time to do color calibration the right way eg. "monitor read out" based. Any suggestions regarding the best price to performance product for proper monitor (LCD) calibration.

Thanks allot.
ID withheld to protect the (not so) innocent;)

hospitalera

Very, very nice on a calibrated crt monitor with firefox browser, SY

Waldo4

I noticed when i got my new high contrast ratio LCD that old photos processed on my previous CRT all looked flat.  In order to look their best they all needed a bit more contrast and saturation to shine on the LCD, even though both monitors were calibrated properly, the LCD could just show more of everything (color, contrast, detail) and imperfections that were previously invisible were plainly obvious.

leaf

I would suggest buying a monitor calibrator. 

Before i had one I didn't think they were important, but now that I am using a calibrated monitor (lacie photon20visionII) calibrated with a spider2pro I go bonkers when viewing things on an uncalibrated monitor.


You can't get a calibrated monitor from just adjusting the gamma.