Author Topic: Istock submission image critique please (Read 4187 times)

vissnz · « **on:** February 22, 2012, 05:40 »

Hello

I am submitting to Istock and need one more image to be accepted.
Please take a look at the following and let me know if you think would be suitable.

(*please see my reply post below for the attachments)

Regards

ShadySue · « **Reply #1 on:** February 22, 2012, 05:50 »

"It seems you don't belong here! You should probably try logging in?"

cathyslife · « **Reply #2 on:** February 22, 2012, 06:03 »

i think one needs a dropbox acct to see your pics.

Difydave · « **Reply #3 on:** February 22, 2012, 06:04 »

I think you have to make the images public for us to see them. Again I think that the link should then be http, and not https.

vissnz · « **Reply #4 on:** February 22, 2012, 06:37 »

My bad! I have transferred to the public area.

newbielink:http://dl.dropbox.com/u/28279162/whitetiger.jpg [nonactive]

newbielink:http://dl.dropbox.com/u/28279162/girlportrait2.jpg [nonactive]

michealo · « **Reply #5 on:** February 22, 2012, 06:47 »

Quote from: vissnz on February 22, 2012, 06:37

My bad! I have transferred to the public area.

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/28279162/whitetiger.jpg

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/28279162/girlportrait2.jpg

the tiger picture isn't exposed correctly

the portrait is a snapshot

I would say neither

ruxpriencdiam · « **Reply #6 on:** February 22, 2012, 06:59 »

Quote from: michealo on February 22, 2012, 06:47

Quote from: vissnz on February 22, 2012, 06:37
My bad! I have transferred to the public area.

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/28279162/whitetiger.jpg

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/28279162/girlportrait2.jpg

the tiger picture isn't exposed correctly

the portrait is a snapshot

I would say neither

Also add OOF

Jo Ann Snover · « **Reply #7 on:** February 22, 2012, 10:46 »

Sorry, but neither of those shots are even close - composition, focus, exposure and white balance problems in both.

markrhiggins · « **Reply #8 on:** February 29, 2012, 05:30 »

agreee with what has been said and add: noise, wb ,and blown highlights.

WelenScos · « **Reply #9 on:** April 20, 2012, 23:29 »

Quote from: Difydave on February 22, 2012, 06:04

I think you have to make the images public for us to see them. Again I think that the link should then be http, and not https.

-----------------------------------------
newbielink:http://www.lightupfoto.com/catalog/studio-lighting [nonactive] newbielink:http://www.lightupfoto.com/catalog/camera-flashes [nonactive] newbielink:http://www.lightupfoto.com/catalog/softboxes [nonactive]

lagereek · « **Reply #10 on:** April 21, 2012, 00:29 »

Terrible! overexposed Tiger and a lousy snapshot. Sorry but dustbin material.

MicrostockGroup Sponsors

Author Topic: Istock submission image critique please (Read 4187 times)

vissnz

ShadySue

cathyslife

Difydave

vissnz

michealo

ruxpriencdiam

Jo Ann Snover

markrhiggins

WelenScos

lagereek

Related Topics

Sponsors

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors