pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: Recognizable faces?  (Read 5213 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

« on: April 20, 2007, 17:09 »
0
Rejection reason at DT:
The image includes recognizable faces of humans. It cannot be accepted without a
model release signed by your subject(s).

attached is a clip of the two human faces in the image.

 


« Reply #1 on: April 21, 2007, 10:46 »
0
yea that is larry and ted!

my two best friends!

lol........ that is nut-O!

« Reply #2 on: April 21, 2007, 10:50 »
0
i thought it was kevin costner and my grandma

« Reply #3 on: April 21, 2007, 11:59 »
0
Hey, that's me!

« Reply #4 on: April 21, 2007, 13:04 »
0
I'm sure the one on the left is Phil Hellmuth ( the Poker player)

does seem slightly strange to reject these, I would say it's worth resubmitting.

« Reply #5 on: April 21, 2007, 17:16 »
0
I will try to send an email to support.  This was posted for the assignment and, although they review it fast, it doesn't make sense to upload them again without any change.

I was curious if their comment made sense.  I believe these people may see themselves there and believe it is them (if they live in Rio and if the use to walk early by the beach), but does it configure a situation in which a release is needed?

Regards,
Adelaide

« Reply #6 on: April 21, 2007, 18:54 »
0
I was curious if their comment made sense.  I believe these people may see themselves there and believe it is them (if they live in Rio and if the use to walk early by the beach), but does it configure a situation in which a release is needed?

Regards,
Adelaide
If the subject or his/her family can tell that it is them in the photo, then you're in trouble. I bet the guy and his family on the left could because of his distinct features. Not sure on the guy on the right. Better to be safe then sorry.

dbvirago

« Reply #7 on: April 21, 2007, 19:38 »
0
The guy on the left is a muppet.


« Reply #8 on: April 22, 2007, 04:01 »
0
I was curious if their comment made sense.  I believe these people may see themselves there and believe it is them (if they live in Rio and if the use to walk early by the beach), but does it configure a situation in which a release is needed?

Regards,
Adelaide
If the subject or his/her family can tell that it is them in the photo, then you're in trouble. I bet the guy and his family on the left could because of his distinct features. Not sure on the guy on the right. Better to be safe then sorry.

i thought about that too, but i could think of at least 3 people I know who i could say this was a picture of - however your reasoning is no doubt why they rejected it.

« Reply #9 on: April 23, 2007, 12:21 »
0
Support said "The faces are visible if the image gets processed in Photoshop."

I'll try that.  And I'll try editing it more to have a full single color, if it's not the case yet.  If even then they're recognizable, I think I will start to believe is CSI-type of police stories!  :)

Regards,
Adelaide

ianhlnd

  • tough men are pussys
« Reply #10 on: June 09, 2007, 19:34 »
0
Yeah, in image>adjustment>shadows it does become more clear.  I think the reason the stocksites are doing this is to prevent some, and I've seen some who did on SS from grabbing a picture burning the silhouette and submitting as an original.  Just my opinion


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
Faces of (wikipedia) FREETARDS !

Started by antistock « 1 2 3  All » Off Topic

66 Replies
35333 Views
Last post July 18, 2012, 13:31
by Poncke
12 Replies
5046 Views
Last post September 21, 2012, 22:00
by cascoly
25 Replies
5972 Views
Last post May 25, 2018, 10:10
by Pauws99
1 Replies
992 Views
Last post June 06, 2022, 12:35
by StanRohrer
4 Replies
201 Views
Last post January 29, 2024, 13:21
by Uncle Pete

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors