MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: Where is my Canon 44.7 MP dSLR Camera  (Read 6324 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Goofy

« on: January 14, 2014, 14:25 »
+2
Okay, where the heck is the Canon dSLR that was to be released 08/2013 that was going to give the Nikon D800e a run for its money? At one time it was going to be named '1D S' but now seems to have been dropped of the face of the earth...


« Reply #1 on: January 14, 2014, 14:42 »
+2
overkill.
And you'll need to buy $10,000 Zeiss lenses to get your pixels worth.

Goofy

« Reply #2 on: January 14, 2014, 15:14 »
+2
"
overkill.
And you'll need to buy $10,000 Zeiss lenses to get your pixels worth."

Let's do the math on payoff of the new Zeiss Lens:

26,316 Subs on Shutter for break even point!

Beppe Grillo

« Reply #3 on: January 15, 2014, 04:31 »
+1
44.7 MP is not enough for web
Why not buy a Sinar P3 with this nice accessory:
http://www.sinar.ch/en/category/products/digital-backs/sinarback-exact/

« Reply #4 on: January 15, 2014, 10:19 »
0
overkill.
And you'll need to buy $10,000 Zeiss lenses to get your pixels worth.

And with Canon's current pricing scheme, the body will cost $10000 too.

Ron

« Reply #5 on: January 15, 2014, 12:53 »
+1
Unless the next camera is 576 megapixels I wont upgrade. For me anything less then the resolution of the human eye is not going to cut it.

http://www.clarkvision.com/imagedetail/eye-resolution.html

And yes, someone already created a gigapixel image, lol

http://www.tawbaware.com/maxlyons/gigapixel.htm

Batman

« Reply #6 on: January 15, 2014, 18:14 »
0
44.7 MP is not enough for web
Why not buy a Sinar P3 with this nice accessory:
http://www.sinar.ch/en/category/products/digital-backs/sinarback-exact/


$33,000 sounds good.

« Reply #7 on: January 15, 2014, 21:31 »
+3
Useful megapixels for most of us has plateaued. The race should now be sensor quality.....dynamic range....noise reduction.etc.
« Last Edit: January 15, 2014, 21:34 by Mantis »

Goofy

« Reply #8 on: January 15, 2014, 22:55 »
0

« Reply #9 on: January 16, 2014, 18:17 »
0
44.7 MP is not enough for web
Why not buy a Sinar P3 with this nice accessory:
http://www.sinar.ch/en/category/products/digital-backs/sinarback-exact/


$33,000 sounds good.


I suppose it's easier than using a sheet of Velvia, but it's a heck of a lot more expensive.

« Reply #10 on: January 16, 2014, 18:36 »
0
Useful megapixels for most of us has plateaued. The race should now be sensor quality.....dynamic range....noise reduction.etc.

Someone talking some sense at last! Extended dynamic range is the advancement that will most likely get me spending my money to upgrade.

« Reply #11 on: January 16, 2014, 19:50 »
0
44.7 MP is not enough for web
Why not buy a Sinar P3 with this nice accessory:
http://www.sinar.ch/en/category/products/digital-backs/sinarback-exact/


One thing against digital backs is their poor low light performance vs modern CMOS sensors.

« Reply #12 on: January 17, 2014, 02:02 »
0
Unless the next camera is 576 megapixels I wont upgrade. For me anything less then the resolution of the human eye is not going to cut it.

http://www.clarkvision.com/imagedetail/eye-resolution.html

And yes, someone already created a gigapixel image, lol

http://www.tawbaware.com/maxlyons/gigapixel.htm


Interesting article Ron....

Beppe Grillo

« Reply #13 on: January 17, 2014, 02:02 »
0
Useful megapixels for most of us has plateaued. The race should now be sensor quality.....dynamic range....noise reduction.etc.

Exact.
When you see the difference of quality that you have comparing full frame sensors with medium format ones you understand that there is a huge hole to fill in the middle.

« Reply #14 on: January 19, 2014, 14:38 »
+1
Useful megapixels for most of us has plateaued. The race should now be sensor quality.....dynamic range....noise reduction.etc.

Someone talking some sense at last! Extended dynamic range is the advancement that will most likely get me spending my money to upgrade.

The 6D is quite phenomenal for its low-light performance.

« Reply #15 on: January 19, 2014, 16:34 »
0
FYI

The Nikon d 4
comes with 14 mpix.

Beppe Grillo

« Reply #16 on: January 20, 2014, 04:11 »
0
FYI

The Nikon d 4
comes with 14 mpix.

They are 16.2
(but all perfect)
« Last Edit: January 20, 2014, 04:19 by Beppe Grillo »

« Reply #17 on: January 20, 2014, 04:45 »
0
FYI

The Nikon d 4
comes with 14 mpix.

They are 16.2
(but all perfect)

However many and however perfect, can they shoot stock-quality photos without any trouble at ISO 3200? The Canon 6D does.

Beppe Grillo

« Reply #18 on: January 20, 2014, 05:13 »
0
FYI

The Nikon d 4
comes with 14 mpix.


They are 16.2
(but all perfect)


However many and however perfect, can they shoot stock-quality photos without any trouble at ISO 3200? The Canon 6D does.


Most of the tests that have seen about high ISO noise give Nikon winner over Canon.
Then in the real use I don't know.

http://www.dxomark.com/en/Cameras/Ratings/List-view

http://www.dxomark.com/Cameras/Ratings/List-view/Sports
Here the first Canon is in 8th position.
« Last Edit: January 20, 2014, 05:16 by Beppe Grillo »

« Reply #19 on: January 20, 2014, 08:45 »
0
FYI

The Nikon d 4
comes with 14 mpix.


They are 16.2
(but all perfect)


However many and however perfect, can they shoot stock-quality photos without any trouble at ISO 3200? The Canon 6D does.


Most of the tests that have seen about high ISO noise give Nikon winner over Canon.
Then in the real use I don't know.

http://www.dxomark.com/en/Cameras/Ratings/List-view

http://www.dxomark.com/Cameras/Ratings/List-view/Sports
Here the first Canon is in 8th position.


I must say, those results come as a real surprise to me. But then I've only got older Canon models to compare the 6D with (the 5D MkII being my previous camera). Maybe the Nikon guys really have been having a ball while we've Canonistas trailed along behind them.

« Reply #20 on: August 11, 2014, 09:44 »
0
I seriously do not think it will be out soon :D

Goofy

« Reply #21 on: August 11, 2014, 13:12 »
0
I seriously do not think it will be out soon :D

show me the updated link   8)

MxR

« Reply #22 on: August 11, 2014, 14:10 »
0
where is my sony a7s with 12 mp...!!

« Reply #23 on: August 11, 2014, 14:29 »
0
I'm thinking of regressing to a micro 4/3 like the GX7 or thereabouts. I really hate big cameras now.

Goofy

« Reply #24 on: August 11, 2014, 14:59 »
0
I am thinking about leaving the Canon family for the D810 Nikon myself...

« Reply #25 on: August 11, 2014, 21:42 »
0
Here you go Goofy: http://www.us.ricoh-imaging.com/645z/

50MP CMOS sensor.  If you really want to blow the D800 out of the water.


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
1 Replies
2989 Views
Last post November 21, 2008, 14:59
by grp_photo
26 Replies
7783 Views
Last post September 20, 2014, 10:27
by MarcvsTvllivs
7 Replies
6347 Views
Last post January 06, 2014, 04:25
by mbjayasekara
1 Replies
1280 Views
Last post January 25, 2013, 06:58
by Reaktori
7 Replies
2113 Views
Last post February 04, 2015, 14:59
by sharkyenergy

Sponsors

Microstock Poll Results